Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-27Última atualização em 2026-05-27

Resumo

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge...

Author: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

In the first quarter, U.S. hedge funds and large mutual funds reached a rare consensus: selling software and rushing into semiconductors, pushing the long-side weight of semiconductors in hedge fund portfolios to a record high.

According to Goldman Sachs' latest "Hedge Fund Trend Monitor" and "Mutual Fund Fundamentals" reports, this analysis covers 1,059 hedge funds (total equity holdings of $4.6 trillion) and 509 large active mutual funds (equity assets under management of $3.9 trillion). The reports show that hedge funds have achieved a return of 7% year-to-date, while only 30% of large mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks, lower than the historical average of 37% since 2007.

The Q1 13F filing data from the U.S. reveals a clear market consensus: hedge funds and mutual funds are simultaneously selling software stocks and flocking to the semiconductor sector. The intensity of this rotation is so great that it has pushed semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios to an all-time high.

In terms of positioning structure, hedge fund net leverage has rebounded to the 85th percentile over the past five years, near a one-year high; meanwhile, the average short interest as a percentage of market capitalization for S&P 500 constituents has risen to 3%, the highest level since 2011, indicating simultaneous intensification of market long/short activity.

Semiconductor Positioning Hits Record High, Software Faces Systematic Reduction

The structural rotation within the technology sector was the most prominent theme this quarter.

Goldman Sachs data shows that semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios has risen to its highest level on record, while software's weight has fallen to its lowest since 2019. Regarding mutual funds, their positioning in software has dropped to its lowest level since 2012. Excluding Microsoft, the magnitude of mutual fund overweight in semiconductors relative to software is also the largest since 2012.

At the individual stock level, Microsoft (MSFT) became one of the stocks with the largest net selling by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Mutual funds also reduced holdings across the remaining members of the "Magnificent Seven." While hedge funds trimmed most "Magnificent Seven" holdings, they achieved net buying in META and AAPL.

For semiconductor stocks, hedge funds net bought LRCX, AMAT, and ASML; mutual funds net bought INTC and SITM.

Leverage and Cash: Hedge Funds Aggressive, Mutual Funds Conservative

Faced with escalating geopolitical tensions in Q1, the response strategies of the two types of institutions showed clear divergence.

Hedge funds initially cut net leverage but then quickly increased positions as markets rebounded in Q2, with net exposure rebounding to near a one-year high. Overall leverage relative to historical levels remains elevated.

Mutual funds, on the other hand, opted to increase cash allocations, raising the cash-to-assets ratio from a historical low of 1.1% at the start of 2026 to 1.4% in early April. However, this level remains historically very low, indicating that mutual funds overall have not significantly withdrawn from equity markets.

Sector Consensus and Divergence: Overweight Industrials, Tech Divergence

Regarding sector allocations, there is high consensus between the two types of institutions, but also clear exceptions. Both hedge funds and mutual funds are overweight the Industrials sector and underweight the Information Technology sector, but their reallocation directions were opposite.

Hedge funds increased their net tilt towards Information Technology by 853 basis points in Q1, the largest single-quarter move for the sector on record, while simultaneously reducing their net tilt towards Industrials by 297 basis points. Mutual funds operated in reverse, increasing Industrials exposure by 24 basis points and cutting Information Technology by 20 basis points.

The two sectors with the most prominent divergence are Financials and Consumer Discretionary: mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight; hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary while mutual funds are underweight.

Four 'Shared Favorites' Outperform the Market Year-to-Date

Goldman Sachs screened for four stocks appearing simultaneously on both the hedge fund VIP list (GSTHHVIP) and the mutual fund overweight list (GSTHMFOW) this quarter: Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). MRVL is a new member this quarter, while Citigroup (C) and Vertiv (VRT) exited the list.

These four stocks have generated a year-to-date return of 10%, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points. Over a longer horizon, since 2013, the "Shared Favorites" basket has an annualized return of 16%, but with a high standard deviation of 22%, indicating significantly higher volatility. Currently, the median stock in this basket trades at a P/E of 34x, a significant premium to the S&P 500 median stock's 18x.

Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are included in the hedge fund VIP list, yet all are underweighted by mutual funds, forming a sharp contrast in attitudes between the two types of institutions towards these core assets.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the analysis of US 13F holdings, what major shift in positioning did both hedge funds and mutual funds make in the tech sector during the first quarter?

ABoth hedge funds and mutual funds engaged in a significant sector rotation within tech: they sold software stocks and aggressively bought into the semiconductor sector. This shift pushed hedge funds' semiconductor long weight to a record high, while software weight fell to its lowest since 2019.

QWhat was the contrasting strategy between hedge funds and mutual funds regarding their use of leverage and cash in response to market conditions?

AHedge funds and mutual funds adopted divergent strategies. Hedge funds increased their net leverage to near a one-year high. In contrast, mutual funds became more conservative, raising their cash allocation from a record low of 1.1% at the start of 2024 to 1.4% by early April, although this level remains historically low.

QWhich specific stock was net sold the most by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter, and which two semiconductor stocks did hedge funds net buy?

AMicrosoft (MSFT) was one of the largest net sells for both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Hedge funds were net buyers of Lam Research (LRCX) and Applied Materials (AMAT), among other semiconductor stocks.

QWhich four stocks were identified as 'Shared Favorites' by Goldman Sachs this quarter, and how has their performance been year-to-date?

AThe four 'Shared Favorites' stocks (appearing on both the hedge fund VIP list and mutual fund overweight list) are Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). This group has delivered a 10% return year-to-date, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points.

QHow did the positioning of hedge funds and mutual funds differ regarding the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks and the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors?

ARegarding the 'Magnificent Seven,' all members are on the hedge fund VIP list but are underweighted by mutual funds. For sector positioning, mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight. Conversely, hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary, while mutual funds are underweight that sector.

Leituras Relacionadas

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

In this podcast, VanEck CEO Jan van Eck discusses his investment outlook centered on three key long-term ("10-year macro") themes: AI-driven compute demand, India's economic rise, and excessive government debt in developed nations. Regarding AI and semiconductors, van Eck believes Nvidia has transformed into a foundational "host" for AI infrastructure, possessing deep moats in software, scale, and power efficiency, making it a core holding. However, he views the recent surge in memory chip stocks as a bubble driven by temporary supply-demand imbalances and pricing power, lacking Nvidia's competitive durability. On asset management, he emphasizes that while ETFs are scale-driven tools, the decisions on which ETFs to own and how to allocate remain highly active. He expresses greatest concern over fixed-income market illiquidity and the risk of a loss of confidence in government debt sustainability. Van Eck is bullish on gold's long-term role as a global monetary alternative and highlights the dramatic policy-driven growth in nuclear energy investment. He is strongly positive on India due to its demographic trends and pro-business reforms. Discussing crypto, he labels 2026 the "year of the corporate-controlled chain," where traditional finance adopts blockchain's best features (like 24/7 operation and programmability) but retains control. He predicts a permanent "crypto winter" for many projects, with only Bitcoin, stablecoins, and the core blockchain concept surviving long-term. He sees the U.S. stablecoin bill as marginally impactful, enabling tech firms to compete with, but not replace, banks. Finally, he views the upcoming SpaceX IPO as a significant, positive liquidity event for markets and advises investors to maintain a long-term, macro perspective when making asset allocation decisions.

marsbitHá 9m

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

marsbitHá 9m

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbitHá 39m

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbitHá 39m

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbitHá 45m

marsbitHá 45m

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbitHá 51m

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbitHá 51m

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbitHá 1h

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation