Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-17Última atualização em 2026-06-17

Resumo

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is tha...

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Over the past two weeks, three crypto research institutions I follow closely—other than Bitwise—have all published in-depth reports addressing the same question: Has the crypto market bottomed?

  • Galaxy Digital: Bitcoin Has Not Bottomed, Data Points to a Potential Bottom Range
  • NYDIG: What Factors Are Suppressing Bitcoin's Price Action
  • Standard Chartered: The Market Bottom Has Already Occurred

These three reports are comprehensive, containing vast amounts of data and complete logical reasoning, and are worth reading in full. However, if you are looking for a simple, unified answer, you might be disappointed: the judgments given by these three authoritative institutions are completely different.

Has the Market Bottomed?

  • Galaxy Digital: No
  • NYDIG: Possibly, but unlikely
  • Standard Chartered: Already bottomed

Let's now break down the core logic of each institution one by one.

Three Institutions, Three Views

Galaxy Digital

Galaxy Digital reviewed Bitcoin's complete 17-year price history and summarized 13 indicators that tend to appear simultaneously when the market truly bottoms out. These indicators cover six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking sell-offs, miner pressure, trend, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment. Long-term Bitcoin investors will be familiar with these indicators, including the 200-week moving average, the Fear & Greed Index, and the Mayer Multiple.

Galaxy found that currently only 4 indicators are fully met, 2 are partially met, and the remaining 7 have not triggered bottom signals. The report concludes that Bitcoin's bottom range for this cycle is between $30,000 and $54,000, with a neutral baseline bottom between $40,000 and $46,000.

NYDIG

NYDIG also employs a multi-indicator comprehensive analysis framework, comparing the current market with historical cycles and evaluating the market state from dimensions such as the duration of the maximum drawdown and holder profit/loss (known to Bitcoin users as 'MVRV', the ratio of market capitalization to realized value).

NYDIG believes that current indicators are very close to the extreme ranges seen at historical major bottoms, but the hallmark comprehensive panic sell-off seen in previous major bear markets has not yet occurred. At the same time, the report introduces a variable: institutional capital inflows have fundamentally changed Bitcoin's cycle logic from the ground up. This cycle's correction might be shallower than historical bear markets. From this perspective, the bottom may have already occurred.

Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered is not uniformly bullish on Bitcoin. Back in February when Bitcoin was at $67,000, the bank lowered its full-year price forecast, warning that prices could fall to $50,000, citing weaker macroeconomics and continuous selling pressure from Bitcoin ETFs.

However, last Friday Standard Chartered updated its view, identifying $59,000 as the bottom for this price action. The two main logics supporting this view are: the potential for a U.S. diplomatic agreement with Iran; and the highly anticipated SpaceX IPO. Standard Chartered believes that a significant number of ETF holders sold Bitcoin earlier to raise funds for participating in SpaceX's listing, and this selling pressure will gradually subside. Standard Chartered's latest forecast is that Bitcoin will challenge $100,000 within the year.

The Consensus Among the Three Reports Far Outweighs the Divergence

You might wonder what effective information can be extracted from three reports with completely opposing views. In fact, the underlying consensus among the three reports far outweighs the surface divergence. For long-term investors, the conclusions on which they agree are far more valuable than their disagreements:

  • All three judge that the market bottom for this cycle will occur within this year;
  • All three believe the current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous highs;
  • All three are consistently optimistic that Bitcoin will experience another bull market in the future.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin's price is around $67,000. One report claims the $59,000 bottom has already occurred, one sees a potential drop to $50,000, and another gives a neutral baseline bottom of $43,000. But the core conclusion is highly unified: the bottom will definitely be reached this year.

This is the key point long-term investors should focus on most. Whether the bottom lands at $40,000, $50,000, or $60,000, the difference is actually limited; what truly matters is whether Bitcoin can subsequently surge to $100,000, $200,000, or even a million dollars. As long as it reaches those levels, entering a long-term position at current prices offers considerable profit potential.

A highly ironic phenomenon in the current market is that everyone is obsessing over whether the market has bottomed, while overlooking a more important question—whether the top has already appeared. In my view, as long as the peak has not yet arrived, Bitcoin holds value for long-term allocation.

The core logic supporting Bitcoin's long-term value not only remains intact but is continuously strengthening: government debt continues to accumulate worldwide with no effective solution in sight; inflation constantly erodes the real purchasing power of wealth; public trust in centralized institutions like governments and banks continues to decline; the global digitalization process keeps accelerating; Bitcoin's trading and investment channels are continuously improving; the early crypto-native generation is aging, with their assets and industry influence growing simultaneously.

Of course, potential risks remain in the market, including threats from quantum computing and tightening global regulation. But overall, the current situation is better than during any previous crypto winter.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three different views on whether the crypto market has bottomed, according to the research reports mentioned in the article?

AGalaxy Digital believes Bitcoin has not yet bottomed. NYDIG sees a possibility but thinks it's unlikely. Standard Chartered Bank states the market bottom has already occurred.

QWhat is the core logical framework Galaxy Digital uses to assess if the market has bottomed?

AGalaxy Digital uses a framework of 13 indicators across six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking sales, miner stress, price trends, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment, such as the 200-week moving average, Fear & Greed Index, and Mayer Multiple.

QWhat specific price range does Galaxy Digital identify as the potential bottom for Bitcoin in this cycle?

AGalaxy Digital identifies the potential bottom range for Bitcoin as $30,000 to $54,000, with a neutral base case bottom of $40,000 to $46,000.

QWhat key reason does Standard Chartered Bank give for reversing its earlier bearish view and now claiming the bottom has been reached?

AStandard Chartered Bank's reversal is based on two key logics: the potential for a US diplomatic agreement with Iran, and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe caused selling pressure from ETF holders that is expected to subside.

QDespite their differing views on the exact bottom, what major consensus do all three research reports share?

AAll three reports agree that the market bottom will occur within the current year, that current prices are closer to the bottom than the previous highs, and that Bitcoin will experience a new bull market in the future.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 15m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 15m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 43m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 43m

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbitHá 1h

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片