Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-11Última atualização em 2026-05-11

Resumo

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI pr...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

After a slight recovery in the broader market, the heat for Meme coins in the Ethereum ecosystem has rekindled. Following ASTEROID, ecological tokens backed by the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, such as sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, have gradually become the focus of market attention, with market capitalizations ranging from millions to tens of millions of dollars, bringing rare concentrated liquidity to the narrative-dry crypto market. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly summarize the information about these tokens in this article and explore whether this boom can drive a recovery in the price of UNI.

Has Hook Summer Arrived? 4 Major Ecological Tokens, Intelligent Liquidity Management

According to Uniswap official documentation, Hook is a "plugin smart contract" tailored for liquidity pools in Uniswap v4. Unlike traditional Uniswap V2/V3 which only has a fixed constant product curve (x*y=k), it allows developers to automatically inject custom logic before and after key lifecycle nodes of the pool (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, Swap, Donate, etc.), thereby turning the entire AMM (Automated Market Maker) into programmable "Lego bricks". Aside from the previous uPEG, recent representative related projects are as follows:

sato: Market Cap Peak Exceeded $38 Million

CA:0x829f4b62eebe12af653b4dd4ffc480966f7d7f09

Current Market Cap: ~$28 Million

On May 4th, when sato first emerged, Odaily Planet Daily provided a brief introduction. At that time, its market cap was only $9 million. This token is minted and burned through the Uniswap v4 curve mechanism. Buying generates new tokens and locks ETH as reserves, while selling exchanges ETH from the reserves and burns tokens. By then, its cumulative buy volume had approached 1000 ETH. Subsequently, sato's market cap once exceeded $30 million.

Although community users later discovered its curve mechanism had a buy-sell spread, causing its market cap to once fall below $13 million, its innovative mechanism and first-mover advantage keep its current market cap around $28 million, with a 24-hour trading volume close to $6 million.

sat1: Market Cap Peak Exceeded $10 Million

CA:0x8f66337a0c2a02202fd91dd596c411cf977c6060

Current Market Cap: ~$800,000

On May 8th, sat1, under the concept of "optimized sato", reached its speculative peak. Thanks to vigorous promotion by crypto KOL Han Ba Long Wang in WeChat groups, the token's market cap once surpassed $10 million. However, with subsequent backlash, the project eventually spiraled down, losing over 90% of its value.

Lo0p: Market Cap Peak Approached $6.6 Million

CA:0x20ea861b3acec90d3a15b4755d9a1cf1f161496e

Current Market Cap: ~$960,000

Official Account: https://x.com/lo0pio

On May 10th, Lo0p's market cap once exceeded $6 million, with a daily increase of over 110x. Similarly, Lo0p's main concept is "a lending AMM protocol based on Uniswap v4 Hook," aiming to solve the idle ETH capital efficiency problem in LP pools. Users buy LO0P tokens by binding the curve, locking them as collateral (without selling), and can directly borrow ETH from the pool reserves at a 40% LTV. Borrowing does not directly impact the spot price; after liquidation, the mechanism attempts to refill the LP band. The Hook injects custom logic during the Swap/liquidity lifecycle, achieving "collateral lending + LP收益 + loan interest" compound returns while maintaining pool price stability. Its core mechanism lies in "built-in lending."

FLOOD: Market Cap Peak Near $6 Million

CA:0xff003fbe8b8d5e7f271a9cb9f2780003daed2aa8

Current Market Cap: ~$1.4 Million

Official Account: https://x.com/flood_markets

On May 10th, FLOOD's market cap once broke $5 million. As the speculative heat cooled down, the current market cap is around $1.4 million. It is reported that FLOOD has a total supply of 50 million tokens. Its special mechanism is: asset reserves generated from user purchases enter the corresponding Aave v3 market to earn yield; transaction fees are also retained in the pool, used to increase reserves and affect the token price. The core lies in Aave integration for automatic yield, with the Hook mechanism playing the role of "automatic rebalancing and yield recycling". No wonder some community users bluntly stated: "Buying funds enter the pool → pool assets generate interest on Aave → interest stays in the pool → long-term price push, so this is using my money to deposit and earn interest?"

Hook Mechanism Tokens Drive Uniswap Ecosystem Development: UNI Bullish Long-Term, But Limited Short-Term Gains

Thanks to the rapid development of the Uniswap v4 Hook mechanism, ecological tokens in this sector have now become a type of Meme coin and project ecological token. In the long run, they can further attract users and capital liquidity to participate in Uniswap v4 liquidity pool trading and development.

Combined with the previous news that "Uniswap has opened the fee switch, with part of the protocol fees used to burn UNI tokens," the long-term fundamentals of UNI show a steady and positive trend.

However, in the short term, the emergence of Hook mechanism tokens cannot directly drive the price increase of the UNI token. Intermediate factors include the token lifecycle and sustainability, token price volatility and transaction fee proportions, and the impact of crypto regulatory policies and overall market trends on the UNI token.

Therefore, in summary, the Hook ecosystem is "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but in the short term, it's more like a "catalyst" than a "booster."

Also according to the Uniswap official website page, the current v4 TVL is temporarily reported at $595 million, slightly lower than v3 ($792 million) and v2 ($966 million) liquidity pools. Therefore, v4 and the Hook ecosystem still need time to accumulate strength and gradually grow into mainstream liquidity management protocols in the market.

Finally, Odaily Planet Daily reminds readers that the above tokens are early-stage technological innovation experimental products and may contain unknown bugs or other risks. Please be aware of the relevant risks when participating in trading. The above information does not constitute investment advice.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is a Hook in Uniswap v4 according to the article?

AA Hook in Uniswap v4 is a plugin-style smart contract designed for liquidity pools. Unlike the fixed constant product curve in traditional Uniswap V2/V3, Hooks allow developers to inject custom logic automatically at key lifecycle points of a pool, such as initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, and donations, making the AMM programmable like Lego blocks.

QWhat was the core mechanism of the Lo0p token mentioned in the article?

AThe Lo0p token's core mechanism was 'built-in lending.' It functioned as a lending AMM protocol based on Uniswap v4 Hooks, aiming to solve the idle ETH capital efficiency problem in LP pools. Users could buy LO0P tokens, lock them as collateral, and borrow ETH directly from the pool reserves at a 40% LTV. This process did not directly impact the spot price, and after liquidation, the mechanism would attempt to refill the LP band.

QHow does the FLOOD token's mechanism integrate with Aave v3, and what was a community member's humorous critique of it?

AFLOOD's mechanism involved channeling the asset reserves generated from user purchases into the corresponding Aave v3 market to earn yield. Trading fees were also retained within the pool to increase reserves and influence the token price. A community member humorously critiqued it by saying, 'Buying funds enter the pool -> pool assets go to Aave to earn interest -> interest stays in the pool -> pushes the price up in the long run. So this is using my money to deposit and earn interest?'

QWhat is the article's view on the impact of Hook-based tokens on the UNI token's price in the short and long term?

AThe article views Hook-based tokens as 'long-term nutrients' for UNI, potentially attracting users and liquidity to the Uniswap v4 ecosystem, which is positive for its long-term fundamentals. However, in the short term, they are seen more as a 'catalyst' rather than a 'booster' for UNI's price, as immediate price movement is influenced by other factors like token lifecycle, fee proportions, crypto regulations, and overall market trends.

QWhat warning does Odaily Planet Daily give to readers regarding the tokens discussed in the article?

AOdaily Planet Daily warns readers that the discussed tokens are early-stage technological innovation experiments that may contain unknown bugs or other risks. It advises participants to be aware of the associated risks when trading and clarifies that the information provided does not constitute investment advice.

Leituras Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Há 15m

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Há 15m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHá 46m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHá 46m

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHá 1h

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片