Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

marsbitPublicado em 2026-08-21Última atualização em 2026-08-21

Resumo

On August 18th, Haowei Huaxin, a semiconductor firm specializing in gallium arsenide and gallium nitride wafers, reported that over a hundred individuals forcibly entered its offices and seized the company's official seals from a safe, including the corporate, contract, and party committee seals. The incident is the latest escalation in a protracted control dispute. Haowei Huaxin, established in 2010, was originally a joint venture. Control became contested after 2021 when Zhenwei Financial Holding injected capital, becoming the largest shareholder (34.01%), while former parent Haite High-Tech's stake was diluted to 33.79%. An agreed-upon governance structure collapsed, leading to mutual accusations. Haite claimed it was locked out of the subsidiary's premises, while also alleging improper management like livestock being kept on the chip fabrication site. After state-owned Qingdao Haiyue Holdings took over Zhenwei's stake in 2023, Haite accused it of illegally seizing control. Despite Haite winning several legal battles in 2024-2026, which affirmed its rights to nominate directors and the chairman, it failed to regain physical control or recover the seals. The stakes are high: market valuations for Haite's stake in Haowei Huaxin are estimated between 3.7 to 5 billion USD, yet it is only valued at about 83 million USD on Haite's books. Losing control effectively jeopardizes a significant portion of Haite's value. In response to the seal seizure, Haite framed it as a "shareh...

On the evening of August 19th, Haiwei Huaxin posted an announcement on its official WeChat account. The title was calm, but the content was not. The company stated that the previous afternoon, about a hundred people swarmed into the office building, their target clear: the safe where the company seals were kept.

The safe door was pried open, and the party committee seal, the official company seal, the contract seal, and the legal representative's handwritten signature seal were all taken. The end of the announcement included several surveillance screenshot images showing people in similar uniforms. The company said it had reported the incident to the police, and as of the announcement's release, the seals had not been recovered.

A semiconductor company holding a national second-level confidentiality qualification, specializing in 6-inch Gallium Arsenide and Gallium Nitride pure wafer foundry services, lost its seals just like that. Quite unusual.

01| Ownership Relationship

Haiwei Huaxin was established in 2010 by CETC's 29th Research Institute and Hightech, with business involving the defense technology industry, making it a mixed-ownership enterprise with some local background.

In 2015, Hightech acquired Chengdu Jiashi Technology, a subsidiary of the 29th Research Institute, obtaining a 52.91% stake in Haiwei Huaxin and becoming the controlling shareholder. Hightech's own business is aircraft maintenance and pilot training.

The key fact is that the ownership relationship was originally clear. The variable appeared in 2021. That year, Haiwei Huaxin introduced a capital increase from Zhenwei Financial Holding, bringing in a massive 1.289 billion yuan. After the capital increase, Zhenwei Financial Holding held 34.01%, becoming the largest shareholder, while Hightech was diluted to 33.79%, falling to second place. Both sides agreed on a system of checks and balances at the time: Zhenwei would appoint the CFO, while Hightech would nominate three directors and appoint the chairman.

However, this mechanism failed to function.

Hightech stated that since May 2021, it couldn't even gain access to Haiwei Huaxin's premises.

According to information disclosed in court documents, in November 2021, the chairman appointed by Hightech expelled the CFO sent by the Zhenwei side and took away the financial seal and online banking U-shields. Access denied, but seals grabbed—both sides have taken action. Hightech also publicly accused Haiwei Huaxin of keeping over twenty black goats, as well as chickens, ducks, and geese within the factory premises, and planting peanuts and pumpkins on vacant land. Semiconductor production lines have clear requirements for a clean environment; running a chip factory as a pastoral farmstead. These descriptions were so vivid that everyone found them believable, hahaha.

In November 2023, a state-owned entity took over Zhenwei Financial Holding, renaming it Qingdao Haiyue Holdings. According to Hightech's side, after the takeover, Haiyue violated the Company Law and the company's articles of association, forcibly took control, illegally amended the articles, and changed the legal representative to Ma Xiaoli.

02| Lawsuits and Control

The real conflict over money and power came later. Hightech sued the other party, and through several rounds of litigation from 2024 to 2026, Hightech won each time.

This January, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court issued a final second-instance ruling, revoking the invalid shareholders' and board meetings resolutions made by the Haiyue side. In March, the Trade Arbitration Commission issued a final ruling, confirming Hightech's right to nominate three directors, appoint the chairman, and nominate the general manager.

The judgments were issued, but the seals and certificates still didn't return. According to Hightech, the Haiyue side refused to comply with the effective judgments, ignoring demands to hand over the official seal and take over the financial books. Hightech could only say it won on paper, but didn't win back control.

03| Triple Value Discrepancy

Why is a seal worth over a hundred people showing up at the door? The numbers make it clear.

Someone on Xueqiu calculated based on the optical module market trend, estimating Haiwei Huaxin's valuation between 12 billion and 16 billion yuan.

Hightech's own market capitalization hovers around 9 billion yuan. Based on its 31.41% stake, the corresponding value of Haiwei Huaxin is between 3.7 billion and 5 billion yuan.

However, in Hightech's 2025 annual report, the book value of this long-term equity investment has dropped to only 832 million yuan.

Aircraft maintenance is a mature business with a low ceiling; what Hightech truly wants to bet on is semiconductors. Losing Haiwei Huaxin is equivalent to losing 40% to 50% of its worth.

Put these numbers together: the parent company's market cap is 9 billion yuan, the market values the subsidiary at over 12 billion, yet its book value is only 832 million yuan. On top of that, the parent company can't even enter the subsidiary's door, and can't get the seals back.

04| The Boundary of Seal Retrieval

On August 20th, Hightech responded to the incident, characterizing the action as 'seal retrieval,' categorizing it as shareholder rights protection, and claiming it was the result of consultation and consensus among the other five shareholders besides Qingdao Haiyue. Whether this statement is true or false cannot be judged now. Even if the five shareholders were truly unanimous, getting the seals is just a small step.

In the world of Chinese corporate battles, seal snatching is nothing new and happens repeatedly year after year. 'Not being the first to snatch the seal' has almost become a form of 'nuclear deterrence.'

In August 2014, NVC Lighting founder Wu Changjiang and major shareholder Wang Donglei fell out. Wang Donglei's side brought people into the company and took the official seal, with both sides telling different stories.

In December 2019, Weihai Holdings' shareholder side took away the official seal and online banking U-shields. The Ningbo Securities Regulatory Bureau later ordered corrective actions.

In April 2020, Li Guoqing led people into Dangdang's office area, taking 11 official seals and 36 financial seals; he brought four people at the time. In May of the same year, Bitmain's Zhan Ketuan was at a government service center to collect the business license, which was snatched away in public by people from the other side.

In November 2021, Zhenshutong announced the loss of control over its seals and certificates. The Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau took regulatory talk measures against the chairman, general manager, and board secretary.

05| Why Take Action

Why does no one take action first, but everyone ends up taking action eventually?

In the operation of Chinese companies, stamping contracts, dealing with banks, and processing changes—nothing can proceed without the seal. Whoever gets the seal in hand first holds the initiative in daily operations. Precisely because everyone knows the other side could also snatch it at any time, a tacit understanding forms in normal times: no one wants to be the first to flip the table.

This tacit understanding is the fragile balance in high-stakes corporate battles. 'Seal snatching' is too typical a phenomenon hanging over the governance of listed companies. Whichever company's governance rots first, its safe should expect trouble.

06| Ownership Undetermined

Balance aside, having the seal in hand is actually not very useful; it doesn't resolve the ownership issue. Perhaps watching too many movies and operas leads people to think it's like the Imperial Sword.

The other party can report it to the police, publish a notice declaring it void, or apply for a new seal and re-register with the bank.

Of course, going through this process takes time, during which the side without the seal cannot sign any contracts. It seems the only thing grabbing the seal accomplishes is buying time. The Weihai seal snatch in 2019 dragged on for four to five years before final resolution.

What Hightech's seal retrieval this time will achieve—whether it leads to Qingdao Haiyue finally handing over the seals and certificates, or triggers another tug-of-war—is uncertain at this point. It's just utterly absurd, letting everyone watch a farce.

An official seal cannot lock down control rights. The answer to listed company management has never been inside a safe.

This article is based on public information and does not constitute investment advice. For any inquiries, please contact [email protected].

Cold Eyes Watch the Market · Sharp Eyes Recognize the Game

This article is from WeChat Official Account: Qingyan Shangping , Author: Qingyan Shangping, Editor: Feng Biao

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the core event reported regarding Haowei Huaxin, and how did the company respond?

AThe core event was that on August 18, around a hundred people entered Haowei Huaxin's office building, forced open a safe, and took away several company seals, including the Party Committee seal, company seal, contract seal, and the legal representative's handwritten signature seal. Haowei Huaxin announced the incident on its official WeChat account on August 19, published surveillance images showing people in similar uniforms, and stated that they had reported the case to the police. The seals had not been recovered by the time of the announcement.

QWho are the major shareholders involved in the control dispute over Haowei Huaxin?

AThe major shareholders involved are Hightech (Haite Gaoxin), which was the original controlling shareholder, and Zhengwei Financial Holdings (later restructured and renamed Qingdao Haiyue Holding). After a 2021 capital increase by Zhengwei, it became the largest shareholder with 34.01% stake, diluting Hightech's share to 33.79%. The control struggle intensified after Qingdao Haiyue took over Zhengwei's stake in 2023.

QWhat was the outcome of the legal battles between Hightech and Qingdao Haiyue regarding control of Haowei Huaxin?

AHightech won the legal battles. In January 2024, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court issued a final second-instance judgment revoking the irregular shareholders' and board of directors' resolutions made by the Haiyue side. In March 2024, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission issued a final ruling confirming Hightech's rights to nominate three directors, appoint the chairman, and nominate the general manager. However, despite these legal victories, Hightech failed to regain physical control, such as the company seals and financial records.

QWhy does the article refer to 'stealing company seals' as a form of 'nuclear deterrence' in high-end corporate battles?

AThe article uses the metaphor of 'nuclear deterrence' to describe the fragile balance in corporate disputes where possessing the company seals grants control over daily operations (like signing contracts and banking). All parties know the other side could also seize the seals, which creates a mutual deterrent against taking the first aggressive action. This balance is precarious; once broken, it leads to overt conflicts like the seal-grabbing incidents, which are seen as a sign of failed corporate governance.

QAccording to the article, what is the ultimate limitation or ineffectiveness of seizing company seals in such disputes?

ASeizing the company seals does not resolve the underlying ownership or control dispute. The opposing party can report the incident to the police, publicly declare the seals invalid, and apply for new ones, re-registering them with banks. Therefore, the primary effect of seizing seals is to delay the other party's operations by creating a temporary administrative obstacle. The article cites the example of Weihai, where a similar seal-grabbing incident in 2019 led to a protracted struggle lasting four to five years, indicating that real solutions lie in legal and governance mechanisms, not in physical possession of the seals.

Leituras Relacionadas

Uniswap Founder: When Stocks and Treasuries Are Fully On-Chain, How Will AMMs Restructure the Global Market?

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams argues that as traditional assets like stocks become tokenized, Automated Market Makers (AMMs) could fundamentally restructure global markets. The core insight is that AMMs are most efficient in "correlated pairs"—such as NVDA/SPY—where assets move together. In these pairs, passive liquidity providers (LPs) who are willing to hold the underlying assets face lower inventory risk and minimal hedging costs compared to traditional, delta-neutral market makers. This cost advantage allows AMMs to undercut professional firms. Tokenization enables assets to trade directly against each other on a shared settlement layer, rather than being siloed in dollar-based systems. Adams observes this pattern already emerging in DeFi, where assets naturally pair with correlated benchmarks (e.g., ETH for Ethereum assets). He believes this will extend to tokenized stocks, with liquidity concentrating in low-volatility correlated pairs, while a few high-volume "bridge pairs" (like SPY/USD) handle dollar conversions. The article highlights that early correlated markets for tokenized stocks already exist (e.g., on Robinhood's chain), and Uniswap v4 hooks like DualPool can further boost LP returns. Adams draws a parallel to the rise of passive index funds, suggesting passive AMM liquidity could similarly democratize market-making and capture significant market share from traditional finance. A response from crypto KOL Cody adds practical analysis, noting that while the correlated pair strategy reduces impermanent loss, current on-chain fees may not yet fully compensate for it. He shares his own LP strategy using valuation models, emphasizing that AMMs offer a novel, low-cost market-making avenue for those willing to hold inventory.

marsbitHá 2m

Uniswap Founder: When Stocks and Treasuries Are Fully On-Chain, How Will AMMs Restructure the Global Market?

marsbitHá 2m

Goldman Sachs Buys Volatility, Turns Bitcoin into a Yield Business

Goldman Sachs acquired NEOS Investments for up to $2.25 billion, gaining a suite of ETFs that generate income by selling options against crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin. This includes the BTCI fund, which sells call options against Bitcoin ETF holdings to capture high premiums from crypto’s volatility, offering investors stable cash flow—around 27% annualized in returns—while capping upside potential and fully exposing them to downside risk. The move highlights Wall Street’s broader push to package crypto-native yield—through staking, lending, and structured products—without taking directional bets on prices. Firms like Fidelity, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley now offer staking services or accept crypto as collateral for loans, collecting steady fees regardless of market direction. In contrast, native crypto firms like Bitwise remain vulnerable to market downturns, as their revenue depends entirely on assets under management. This reflects a strategic pivot: large institutions no longer need to “believe” in crypto to profit from it. They monetize volatility and investor activity through fee-based structures, leaving price risk to retail investors. As regulatory shifts like the proposed 401(k) rules unfold, yield-generating crypto products may gain even broader adoption in traditional portfolios, further cementing Wall Street’s role as a neutral intermediary capturing reliable revenue streams from the ecosystem.

marsbitHá 6m

Goldman Sachs Buys Volatility, Turns Bitcoin into a Yield Business

marsbitHá 6m

AI Launches a Fierce Assault on Cancer, Virtually Tests 4,000 Anti-Cancer Drugs, Google Gemma Downloads Exceed 1 Billion

Google's open-source Gemma AI model family has reached a new milestone, surpassing 10 billion cumulative downloads in two and a half years since its February 2024 launch. This growth has fueled a vast ecosystem, with over 100,000 developer-derived model variants powering diverse applications, from NASA satellites to over 100 million phones. A standout application involves cancer research. In collaboration with Google Research and Yale, a team developed a 27-billion-parameter model called Cell2Sentence-Scale 27B (C2S-Scale). This model innovatively converts complex single-cell sequencing data into a "sentence" of gene names ranked by activity, allowing it to analyze cellular behavior. It was used to conduct a "dual-context virtual screen" of over 4,000 drugs, aiming to find one that specifically boosts antigen presentation—a key process for immune system recognition—only in the presence of low interferon signals (a "cold tumor" context), not in neutral conditions. The model identified silmitasertib (CX-4945), a CK2 kinase inhibitor, as a top candidate. Subsequent live-cell experiments validated this AI-generated hypothesis, showing that the drug combined with low-dose interferon increased antigen presentation by about 50%, whereas neither element alone had a significant effect. This represents a novel, AI-proposed mechanistic pathway for potential cancer therapy. Beyond biomedicine, the Gemma ecosystem is expanding into unique domains. Models have been deployed in space on high-performance GPUs and are being used in projects like DolphinGemma to decipher dolphin communication patterns. The 10-billion-download milestone underscores a key trend: the disruptive potential of AI lies not just in raw model capability but in its widespread, silent integration into diverse hardware and real-world applications, as evidenced by the thriving "Gemmaverse" community.

marsbitHá 7m

AI Launches a Fierce Assault on Cancer, Virtually Tests 4,000 Anti-Cancer Drugs, Google Gemma Downloads Exceed 1 Billion

marsbitHá 7m

Shocking: OpenAI Fully Open-Sources Codex Harness

OpenAI has open-sourced the core framework of Codex, called "Harness," under an Apache-2.0 license. This move allows developers to deeply integrate AI agents into their own applications and workflows, moving beyond the limitations of generic chat interfaces. The Harness is the underlying execution system that manages an AI agent's complete lifecycle: understanding tasks, maintaining memory, using tools, handling failures, and requesting human approvals. OpenAI demonstrated that optimizations to the Harness alone can dramatically boost a model's performance, tripling scores on a benchmark while using significantly fewer tokens. The release includes three key components: a CLI tool (`codex exec`) for automated tasks, official SDKs (TypeScript/Python) for programmatic control, and the `app-server` for embedding agents directly into products. This enables features like persistent state, real-time event streaming, and human-in-the-loop controls. Early adopters showcase its versatility beyond coding. Examples include a tax preparation system that cut processing time by one-third, Cisco's platform for building apps with natural language, and a demo logistics dashboard where agents analyze data and propose actions within the existing interface. This paradigm shift grants developers full control over the user interface, context, tools, and security boundaries. AI becomes an invisible assistant within specialized software, rather than a separate chatbot. By open-sourcing the engine behind its powerful agents, OpenAI aims to spark a new wave of native, deeply integrated AI applications.

marsbitHá 12m

Shocking: OpenAI Fully Open-Sources Codex Harness

marsbitHá 12m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PEOPLE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Depois de comprar o teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Transaciona facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

715 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PEOPLE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PEOPLE (PEOPLE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片