Grayscale-Linked Firms Sell XRP and Solana Holdings as ETF Outflows Rise

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-03Última atualização em 2026-02-03

Resumo

Grayscale's parent company, Digital Currency Group (DCG), and its affiliate, DCG International Investment Ltd., are selling their holdings in Grayscale's Solana and XRP ETFs. This was disclosed in recent SEC filings and coincides with a broader crypto market decline of approximately $5 billion. DCG sold 26,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) as Solana's price fell below $100. Simultaneously, DCG International sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP), contributing to significant outflows from these funds. These sales are presented as portfolio adjustment moves in response to market conditions rather than a shutdown of the products, signaling a cautious institutional sentiment towards these major altcoins.

Grayscale-linked companies are quietly selling their exposure to XRP and Solana when the crypto market is under pressure. The investors started pulling money out of the Altcoin ETFs, according to the recent U.S. regulatory filings. The sales come after the crypto market is wiping out around $5 billion in value, and ETF outflows signal weakening institutional confidence in some major altcoins.

The two key firms, such as Digital Currency Group (DCG), which is Grayscale’s parent company, and DCG International Investment Ltd, which is the DCG-linked investment entity, are the sellers. Both companies disclosed their sales through official U.S SEC Form 144 filings, which are required when insiders sell securities.

DCG reduces Solana Exposure

DCG sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) for about $115,440. This sale happened on Feb 2, and the trade was handled by Canaccord Genuity. These shares were originally bought in January 2025, and over the past week, DCG has sold 26,000 GSOL shares in total. This activity coincides with Solana’s price dropping below $100 with 16% dip in one week, which caused around $5.5 million to be left from the Solana ETF.

DCG International cuts XRP ETF holdings

DCG International Investment Ltd sold 3,620 shares of the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP) worth around $115,070. The sale took place on February 2, and these shares were acquired in September 2024. The firm sold 15,000 GXRP shares last week alone. XRP ETFs faced strong selling pressure, and the price dropped below $1.60. The grayscale XRP ETF alone lost $98.39 million, with total XRP ETF outflows reaching $92.92 million.

These moves do not mean Grayscale is shutting down XRP or Solana products. They show that the firms are adjusting their positions according to market conditions. ETF outflows suggest that investors are becoming more cautious, and insider sales usually reflect portfolio adjustments.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Chainlink Slips Below $10 as Selling Pressure Continues

TagsGrayscaleSolanaxrp

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhich Grayscale-linked firms are selling their XRP and Solana holdings according to the article?

ADigital Currency Group (DCG), which is Grayscale's parent company, and DCG International Investment Ltd, a DCG-linked investment entity.

QWhat was the value of the GSOL shares sold by DCG on February 2nd?

ADCG sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) for about $115,440.

QHow much did the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP) lose, according to the regulatory filings?

AThe Grayscale XRP ETF alone lost $98.39 million.

QWhat do the ETF outflows and insider sales signal about institutional confidence?

AThe ETF outflows signal weakening institutional confidence in some major altcoins, and the insider sales reflect portfolio adjustments in response to market conditions.

QDoes the selling activity mean that Grayscale is shutting down its XRP or Solana products?

ANo, the moves do not mean Grayscale is shutting down XRP or Solana products. They show that the firms are adjusting their positions according to market conditions.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHá 39m

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHá 39m

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbitHá 2h

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片