Grayscale Highlights Bitcoin’s Resilience as Community Prepares for Quantum Era

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-04-07Última atualização em 2026-04-07

Resumo

Grayscale's head of research, Zach Pandl, argues that Bitcoin's primary challenge in the quantum era is not technological but social. While a recent Google study raised concerns about quantum computers potentially breaking Bitcoin's encryption, Pandl highlights that Bitcoin's UTXO model, proof-of-work consensus, and lack of native smart contracts make it less vulnerable than other cryptocurrencies. The real issue lies in the community's ability to reach consensus on how to handle the estimated 1.7 million BTC in early, quantum-vulnerable addresses—including those possibly belonging to Satoshi Nakamoto. Potential solutions include burning those coins, limiting spending from risky addresses, or taking no action. This echoes past divisive debates, like the one surrounding Bitcoin Ordinals, underscoring the difficulty of achieving community agreement.

If the Bitcoin community is unable to resolve certain tense problems, the chief researcher at Grayscale warns that resolving the quantum danger to the cryptocurrency may be more of a social than a technological task. On March 30, Google published a document that grabbed the crypto industry’s attention. The research hinted that a quantum computer might perhaps decrypt Bitcoin’s encryption with a lot less power than expected.

However, Grayscale’s head of research Zach Pandl argued that Bitcoin’s technical solution isn’t the issue; he argued that “bitcoin has lower risk than other cryptocurrencies” due to its use of a UTXO model and proof-of-work consensus, lack of native smart contracts, and the fact that certain address types are not quantum vulnerable.

Community’s Ability to Decide on a Course of Action

Pandl said that the community’s ability to decide on a course of action would be the real obstacle. The fate of the approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins (BTC) held in early P2PK addresses, including Satoshi’s estimated 1 million BTC hoard, which is now valued at over $68 billion, has sparked heated debates among the Bitcoin community.

Coins for which the private key is unavailable or misplaced must be handled by the Bitcoin community, according to Pandl’s writing. Burning the coins, purposefully reducing the pace of spending from susceptible addresses, or doing nothing are their three primary alternatives.

In 2023, a major controversy involving Bitcoin Ordinals—a technology that allows for the imprinting of data like text and pictures onto a satoshi, the smallest unit of Bitcoin—erupts over the use of blockspace. Pandl was alluding to this. Even while things have calmed down a little in the intervening two years, the two camps are still very much divided.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

SEC Moves Crypto Safe Harbor Proposal to White House for Review

TagsBitcoinBlockchain

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main challenge in addressing the quantum threat to Bitcoin according to Grayscale's head of research?

AThe main challenge is the community's ability to decide on a course of action, which is more of a social task than a technological one.

QWhy does Zach Pandl argue that Bitcoin has lower quantum risk than other cryptocurrencies?

AHe argues this is due to Bitcoin's use of a UTXO model, proof-of-work consensus, lack of native smart contracts, and the fact that certain address types are not quantum vulnerable.

QWhat is the estimated value of the Bitcoins held in early P2PK addresses mentioned in the article?

AThe approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins in early P2PK addresses, including Satoshi's estimated 1 million BTC, are valued at over $68 billion.

QWhat are the three primary alternatives the Bitcoin community has for handling coins with unavailable private keys?

AThe three primary options are burning the coins, purposefully reducing the pace of spending from susceptible addresses, or doing nothing.

QWhat major Bitcoin-related controversy from 2023 did Pandl allude to in relation to community divisions?

AHe alluded to the major controversy involving Bitcoin Ordinals, a technology that allows imprinting data like text and pictures onto a satoshi, which erupted over the use of blockspace.

Leituras Relacionadas

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbitHá 35m

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbitHá 35m

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbitHá 56m

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbitHá 56m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ERA

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Caldera (ERA) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Caldera (ERA)Depois de comprar o teu Caldera (ERA), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Caldera (ERA)Transaciona facilmente Caldera (ERA) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

383 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.07.17

Como comprar ERA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ERA (ERA) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片