Grayscale Discloses Potential Investment Candidates: Which Crypto Assets Are Under Consideration?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-15Última atualização em 2026-01-15

Resumo

Grayscale, a leading crypto asset manager, has disclosed its list of potential digital assets under consideration for future investment products, alongside an updated list of assets currently held in its existing products. These lists are organized using Grayscale's proprietary crypto sector classification framework. The "Asset Candidate List" features digital assets not currently held but identified as potential candidates. The "Existing Grayscale Product Assets" list details holdings as of January 12, 2026. The firm plans to update these lists quarterly. Grayscale emphasizes that the inclusion of an asset on the candidate list does not guarantee a product will be launched, as the process is complex and depends on internal controls, custody arrangements, and regulatory considerations. Assets may also be added to products without first appearing on the candidate list. The announcement includes a reminder that new products may not receive approval for secondary market trading. This information is for informational purposes only and not an offer to sell or buy securities.

Author: Grayscale

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

As a leading crypto asset management company, introducing a diverse range of investable digital assets to investors is a crucial part of our mission.

Therefore, we are pleased to share this candidate list of assets that may potentially be included in Grayscale investment products in the future, along with an updated list of assets currently in our existing product lineup. Both lists are categorized according to the Grayscale Crypto Sector Classification Framework we designed, which aims to set the standard for organizing crypto asset categories.

The "Asset Candidate List" includes digital assets that are not currently part of Grayscale investment products but have been identified by our team as potential candidates for future products.

The "Assets in Existing Grayscale Product Lineup" lists the digital assets held by Grayscale products as of January 12, 2026, which may be part of either single-asset products or multi-asset products.

As the crypto ecosystem expands and the Grayscale team reviews or re-evaluates additional assets, we plan to update this list as frequently as possible within 15 days after the end of each quarter. The following lists are as of January 12, 2026, and may change during the quarter as some multi-asset funds rebalance their compositions and we launch new single-asset products.

*As of December 31, 2025, assets not included in the Grayscale Crypto Sector Classification.

1 Assets may be directly included in the Grayscale product lineup without first being listed in this table, for example, if a decision is made to include an asset in a Grayscale product during the quarter.

The process of creating investment products similar to our existing ones is complex and multifaceted. It requires in-depth review and consideration and is influenced by various factors such as internal controls, custody arrangements, and regulatory requirements. It is important to note that this table is for informational purposes only, and not all candidate assets will be converted into our investment products. Grayscale may also explore other assets not listed in the table for inclusion in its product lineup. Similarly, assets may be directly included in the Grayscale product lineup without first being listed in this table.

Grayscale may attempt to have shares of new products quoted on secondary markets. Although shares of certain Grayscale products are approved for trading on secondary markets (such as OTCQX), for investors in new products, it cannot be assumed that such shares will receive similar approval due to potential concerns from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and/or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) regarding the status of the underlying digital assets under federal securities laws.

This article does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities in any jurisdiction, nor should it be considered as legal to make such an offer, solicitation, or sale without registration or qualification under the securities laws of that jurisdiction. Grayscale, its affiliates, and clients may hold positions in the digital assets or securities discussed herein.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the purpose of Grayscale's 'asset candidate list'?

AThe 'asset candidate list' identifies digital assets not currently included in Grayscale investment products but have been identified by their team as potential candidates for future products.

QHow often does Grayscale plan to update its list of potential investment assets?

AGrayscale plans to update the list as frequently as possible, aiming for within 15 days after the end of each quarter.

QAs of the article's date, what framework does Grayscale use to categorize crypto assets for its products?

AGrayscale uses its own designed 'Grayscale Crypto Sector Classification Framework' to categorize crypto assets for its products.

QDoes inclusion on the candidate list guarantee an asset will be turned into a Grayscale investment product?

ANo, inclusion on the candidate list does not guarantee an asset will be turned into a product. It is for informational purposes only, and not all candidate assets will be converted.

QWhat is a significant regulatory consideration mentioned for new Grayscale products seeking secondary market trading?

AA significant consideration is that the SEC and/or FINRA may have concerns about the status of the product's underlying digital asset under federal securities laws, so approval for secondary market trading cannot be assumed.

Leituras Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHá 13m

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHá 13m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片