Goldman Sachs Flags Oil Price Risks, Will Cryptocurrencies be Affected?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-20Última atualização em 2026-03-20

Resumo

Goldman Sachs warns that rising oil prices, potentially exceeding $100 a barrel and even the 2008 high of $147.50, pose significant risks for 2026-2027 due to supply shocks from the Middle East conflict. This has raised questions about potential impacts on cryptocurrencies. While major cryptos like BTC and XRP have held steady prices recently, the risk of inflation could change the market dynamic. Analysts offer mixed crypto forecasts; one expert doubts BTC will reach $100,000 soon, while another predicts a potential drop to $10,000. Concurrently, traditional safe-havens gold and silver have seen price declines.

Goldman Sachs has flagged the possibility for risks in 2026 and 2027 if oil prices continue to rise. This stems from the ongoing Middle East conflict with Strait of Hormuz as a critical factor. One question that has now come up is whether it will impact cryptocurrencies. Prices are currently steady; however, there are chances of inflation, which could dramatically change the equation.

Oil Prices, Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs has addressed the timeline as the near term and into 2027, saying that supply shocks could lead to oil prices staying above $100 a barrel. Brent was last seen at around $119 before retreating to $109 a barrel. Goldman Sachs, in a report, has underlined that it may even breach the 2008 ATH of $147.50.

One of the scenarios supporting this downside is the crude for cargoes of Europe and Africa, wherein the price has reached $120. Russian supplies have also recorded a high of around $100.

Dennis Kissler from BOK Financial has said that it could take longer to bring the supply back to the market, given that the logistics could remain a nightmare. Meanwhile, there is still no tentative timeline regarding the conclusion of the Middle East conflict.

Cryptocurrencies, Gold, and Silver

Cryptocurrencies have held their respective steady prices over the last 24 hours. ETH, however, has shed 2.29% of its value. BTC, XRP, and a few more tokens have maintained a decent level on the price chart. The flagship crypto is still above the $70k mark, and the XRP price is strong at $1.45.

Gold and Silver have more attention at the moment. Gold price has slipped below $5k and is now at $4,672.71. While it reflects a daily jump of 0.51%, the price is down by 8.05% in the last 5 days and 4.03% over the last 30 days.

Silver, however, has lost 1.90% in 5 days to reach $71.43 at the time of writing this article.

What’s Next for Crypto Prices?

Specifically for crypto prices, projections are on both sides – up and down. A news report has quoted Bitget Chief Analyst Ryan Lee as highlighting BTC reaching $10k in the near future is highly unlikely. Lee said that it would take an extreme shock for the token to go that far.

Mike McGlone from Bloomberg Intelligence, on the other hand, has said that Bitcoin tokens may fall to $10k. The senior commodity strategist has based this from the institutional perspective, citing that the crypto asset class is dead.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Slides After Fed Caution, $70K Emerges as Critical Support

TagscryptocurrenciesGoldman Sachs

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat potential risk has Goldman Sachs flagged regarding oil prices for 2026 and 2027?

AGoldman Sachs has flagged the possibility of oil prices staying above $100 a barrel due to supply shocks, potentially even breaching the 2008 all-time high of $147.50.

QWhat is the critical factor mentioned that is contributing to the oil price risks?

AThe ongoing Middle East conflict, with the Strait of Hormuz being a critical factor, is contributing to the oil price risks.

QHow have major cryptocurrencies like BTC and XRP performed in the last 24 hours according to the article?

ACryptocurrencies have held steady prices over the last 24 hours. BTC is still above the $70k mark, and XRP is strong at $1.45, though ETH has shed 2.29% of its value.

QWhat are the two contrasting price projections for Bitcoin in the article?

ABitget Chief Analyst Ryan Lee stated that BTC reaching $100,000 in the near future is highly unlikely and would require an extreme shock. Conversely, Mike McGlone from Bloomberg Intelligence suggested Bitcoin may fall to $10,000, citing that the crypto asset class is 'dead' from an institutional perspective.

QWhat is the price movement of Gold and Silver mentioned in the report?

AGold's price has slipped below $5,000 to $4,672.71, reflecting a daily jump of 0.51% but is down 8.05% over the last 5 days. Silver has lost 1.90% in 5 days, reaching $71.43.

Leituras Relacionadas

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

Institutional Bitcoin reserves held by publicly traded companies are overwhelmingly concentrated in the US, according to data from Unfolded. US-based firms hold 1.24 million BTC, accounting for a staggering 92.7% of the global total held by such entities. Over the past 12 months, these companies added 510,000 BTC to their portfolios, a purchasing rate that vastly outpaced new supply. Their acquisitions were more than triple the number of new BTC mined during the same period, significantly impacting the asset's supply dynamics. This trend, heavily influenced by firms like MicroStrategy, reflects a growing institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset across sectors like energy, technology, and finance. Analysts warn this sustained institutional demand, especially after the upcoming halving which will reduce new supply, could further strain the supply-demand balance and influence long-term price trends.

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

Reddit reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $253 million, roughly triple the $89 million from a year earlier. Revenue surged 61% year-over-year to $805 million, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of over 60% growth. Advertising revenue jumped 64% to $762 million, driven by higher ad prices and increased impressions. The company's weekly active unique users surpassed 500 million for the first time, reaching 514.6 million. However, executives flagged a concern: traffic from search engines became volatile toward the end of the quarter, creating headwinds for converting its large audience into daily users. CEO Steven Huffman noted that "AI overviews have not yet had a similarly positive impact" on search referrals compared to traditional links. Other highlights include adjusted EBITDA rising 43% to $343 million, operating cash flow of $262 million for the quarter, and the launch of Reddit's first shareholder return program with $235 million spent on share repurchases. For the current quarter, Reddit forecasts revenue between $860 million and $870 million.

cryptonews.ruHá 10m

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

cryptonews.ruHá 10m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHá 14m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHá 14m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHá 24m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHá 24m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow