Gold Plunged Over 4%, Silver Crashed 11%, Did the US Stock Market Plunge Trigger Algorithmic Selling in Precious Metals?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-13Última atualização em 2026-02-13

Resumo

Gold and silver prices plummeted sharply on Thursday, with gold dropping over 4% and silver plunging nearly 11%, amid a broader sell-off in metals triggered by a significant decline in U.S. equities. The Nasdaq fell more than 2%, prompting some traders to liquidate commodity positions—including gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium—to cover losses in equities and seek liquidity. A strong dollar and risk-off sentiment contributed to the decline. The sharp and sudden downturn was largely attributed to algorithmic and momentum-driven trading. After a period of sustained gains, metals faced heavy selling pressure as key technical levels were breached, leading to automated sell orders. Some analysts characterized the move as a "vacuum-style drop," typical of systematic trading strategies during periods of market stress. Despite the sell-off, many analysts remain bullish on gold’s longer-term prospects, citing ongoing geopolitical risks, questions around Federal Reserve policy, and a broader shift away from traditional assets. Major banks, including J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank, maintain positive year-end targets. Market participants are now closely watching upcoming U.S. economic data, particularly the CPI release, for clues on the Fed’s interest rate path, as lower rates generally support non-yielding assets like precious metals.

On Thursday, US stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq dropping over 2%. Some traders sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market, leading to significant declines in gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium. The US Dollar Index saw a slight increase.

Amid renewed concerns over whether massive AI investments can truly be implemented on a large scale, US tech stocks declined. Metal prices suddenly dropped amid suspected algorithmic trading sell-offs, with some investors forced to exit commodity positions, including metals, for liquidity, while some funds shifted to US Treasuries for safety.

Spot gold once fell by 4.1%, while silver plummeted by 11%. Copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) dropped by 2.9%. Metal prices later pared some of their losses:

At the close of New York trading on Thursday, spot gold fell 3.26% to $4,918.36 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it maintained a slight decline, largely holding above $5,050, before experiencing a sharp plunge, hitting a daily low of $4,878.66. COMEX gold futures fell 3.06% to $4,942.50 per ounce.

At the close of New York trading on Thursday (February 12), spot silver fell 10.89% to $75.0942 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it held steady above $82 with a slight decline, before a sharp drop below $76, hitting a daily low of $74.4456 near the close of US stocks. COMEX silver futures fell 10.56% to $75.050 per ounce.

Other important metals: COMEX copper futures fell 3.65% to $5.7740 per pound, spot platinum fell 6.19%, and spot palladium fell 5.89%.

What Do Analysts Say?

Regarding Thursday's gold and silver movements, industry insiders said: "This all happened too fast, it felt like a risk-off move. During periods of extreme market stress, even safe-haven assets like gold are sold by investors in urgent need of liquidity."

Part of the selling in gold and silver on Thursday also stemmed from profit-taking, as the previous rapid rally was partly driven by speculative buying.

Some industry insiders pointed out that for gold and silver, trading is still largely driven by sentiment and momentum. On days like this, they struggle.

Since 2024, gold and silver have surged strongly, with momentum-driven buying pushing metal prices to repeated new records. However, this trend halted abruptly on January 29, when gold recorded its largest single-day drop in over a decade, and silver saw its biggest decline on record. Since then, both metals have traded in a narrow range with increased volatility, lacking new catalysts.

Some analysts believe that Thursday's sudden drop in gold prices does not signal an imminent sustained downtrend. However, it does increase the likelihood of continued volatility in the short term. The market has cleared a significant chunk of lower liquidity, and the next move will depend on how prices perform near key technical levels.

Media analysis noted that despite a slight rebound, overall, metal prices were hit hard in a sudden vacuum-like decline, more akin to systematic strategy selling—such as momentum-driven de-risking operations common among CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) groups when key levels are breached.

Despite recent sharp declines, many analysts still expect gold to resume its upward trend, believing the factors that drove the earlier rally remain—including geopolitical tensions, doubts about the Fed's independence, and a broader shift from traditional assets like currencies and sovereign bonds to alternative assets. J.P. Morgan Private Bank expects gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by year-end, while Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs maintain bullish views.

The world's largest silver ETF, iShares Silver Trust, saw significant trading in May/June $125 strike call options, while investors sold contracts previously bought at high levels, which may have further intensified selling pressure on silver.

Traders are now focusing on US economic data, including the key CPI data to be released on Friday, for clues on the Fed's interest rate path. Lower borrowing costs typically benefit non-yielding precious metals.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason for the sharp decline in precious metals like gold and silver according to the article?

AThe decline was primarily triggered by algorithmic trading sell-offs, as investors sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market and obtain liquidity during a risk-off event.

QHow much did spot silver drop at its lowest point during the trading session?

ASpot silver plummeted by 10.89%, reaching a low of 74.4456 dollars per ounce.

QWhat broader market movement coincided with the sell-off in precious metals?

AThe sell-off coincided with a significant drop in U.S. tech stocks, with the Nasdaq falling over 2%, amid renewed worries about the large-scale implementation of AI investments.

QDespite the recent drop, what is the outlook for gold from major banks like J.P. Morgan according to the analysts in the article?

AAnalysts from J.P. Morgan Private Bank expect gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by the end of the year, maintaining a bullish outlook.

QWhat upcoming economic data are traders focusing on for clues about the Federal Reserve's policy?

ATraders are focusing on the upcoming U.S. CPI data to find clues about the Federal Reserve's future interest rate path.

Leituras Relacionadas

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHá 1h

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbitHá 1h

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手Há 1h

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar 4

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de 4 (4) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar 4 (4) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu 4 (4)Depois de comprar o teu 4 (4), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona 4 (4)Transaciona facilmente 4 (4) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

618 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar 4

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de 4 (4) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片