Gold Gains as a Safe-Haven while Cryptocurrencies Fumble

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-25Última atualização em 2026-02-25

Resumo

Gold has strengthened as a safe-haven asset amid global uncertainty, rising 0.8% to over $5,190 per ounce, while the US Dollar's performance further supports its appeal. Silver also saw significant gains. In contrast, cryptocurrencies experienced volatility but recovered slightly, with Bitcoin up 3.24% and Ethereum gaining 5.17%, though both remain highly volatile. Market uncertainty is driven by geopolitical tensions and new tariff policies. Investors are advised to conduct thorough research before investing in any asset.

Gold, a precious metal, has gained values as a safe-haven. This comes at a time when cryptocurrencies are experiencing volatility. The phase of uncertainty has been attributed to several factors, including, but not limited to, the US-Iran conflict and a new tariff rate by US President Donald Trump.

Gains in Gold

Gold was earlier seen up by 0.8% to maintain a value of more than $5k. The yellow metal showed a trading rate of $5,190.99 per ounce in the latest review, strengthening its tag as a safer alternative. Notably, experts believe that Gold gaining values often coincides with the rising uncertainty worldwide.

Gold, as noted by market experts, is also expanding its ground because of the performance of the US Dollar against the basket of six currencies. The US Dollar is currently at 97.9833. Market experts also believe that such fundamental drivers could enable bullion bulls to estimate returns towards record highs.

Silver recorded a bigger jump of 3.60% to $90.305. It further reflects an uptick of 3.51% in a single day and 16.96% gain in a week.

Recovery and Volatility for Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies were down earlier, but they seem to have recovered following the conclusion of the State of the Union Address by Donald Trump. The collective market cap has jumped by 3.30% to $2.26 trillion. BTC, the flagship crypto, is up by 3.24% over the last 24 hours; however, it continues to experience a very high volatility above 10%.

A similar level of volatility can be seen for ETH, a token that has gained 5.17% during the same timeline. Its movement is amid a volatility rate of 15.78%. Overall sentiments are bearish with an FGI of 11 points. The total daily liquidation for the crypto market comes to $325.16 million when drafting this piece.

Note on Uncertainty

Uncertainty in the market reportedly stems from the imposition of a new tariff by Trump at 10%, likely to be increased to 15%, and a possible surging US-Iran conflict. Trump has stated that some countries want to stay with agreements made earlier. But, there is still no clarity about the refund of the excess tariff collected.

Cryptocurrencies, Gold, and every other investment alternative remain under the spotlight as investors weigh their options. It is important to do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto or any other kind of investment.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Solana (SOL) on the Rise: Will the 8% Surge Unlock the $90 Level?

TagscryptocurrenciesGold

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy has gold gained value as a safe-haven asset according to the article?

AGold has gained value as a safe-haven asset due to rising global uncertainty, attributed to factors like the US-Iran conflict and new tariff rates imposed by the US.

QWhat was the trading rate of gold's value per ounce as mentioned in the latest review?

AThe trading rate of gold was $5,190.99 per ounce in the latest review.

QHow did the cryptocurrency market perform following the conclusion of Donald Trump's State of the Union Address?

AFollowing the conclusion of the State of the Union Address, the cryptocurrency market recovered, with the collective market cap jumping by 3.30% to $2.26 trillion.

QWhat are the two main sources of market uncertainty highlighted in the article?

AThe two main sources of market uncertainty are the imposition of a new tariff by the US, potentially increasing to 15%, and the escalating US-Iran conflict.

QWhat is the current Fear and Greed Index (FGI) sentiment for cryptocurrencies as per the article?

AThe overall sentiment for cryptocurrencies is bearish with a Fear and Greed Index (FGI) of 11 points.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 1h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 2h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片