From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing the Prediction Market Involution Index and Anti-Harvesting Strategies

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-16Última atualização em 2026-01-16

Resumo

From Polymarket to Probable: Deconstructing Prediction Market Competition and Anti-Sybil Strategies Prediction markets require real capital, filtering out low-effort users but introducing financial risk. Key precautions include regulatory awareness, risk management, and understanding market manipulation risks. Effective participation demands analytical skills and careful attention to contract terms. Blind betting often leads to losses; hedging across platforms can reduce unilateral risk. Polymarket leads with $22B+ funding, 920K traders, and strong U.S. re-entry prospects. It is highly competitive but worth engaging with cost control. Kalshi, with $16B funding and CFTC regulation, has high transaction volume but no clear token plan, making participation less cost-effective. Opinion shows rapid growth, clear airdrop expectations, and strong backing, but requires strategic engagement. Predict.fun, backed by YZi Labs, has lower competition and explicit airdrops, attracting users primarily for points farming. Probable, incubated by PancakeSwap, is in early stages with zero fees and a referral-based points system, presenting low competition and high potential. Overall, evaluate projects based on backing, user competition, and incentive structures before committing funds.

Original author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Airdrop hunting has evolved into a sophisticated investment. However, in the highly sought-after prediction market sector, not all projects are worth investing time and capital in.

Prediction markets, in particular, differ from zero-cost testnet tasks as they usually require placing bets with "real money." Although the amount per bet is controllable, this "pay-to-play" threshold directly filters out a large number of pure freeloading script users and also brings the risk of capital attrition for real users.

If you're still debating which project to place your chips on in 2026, this article will help you analyze from three dimensions: reasons for attention, level of involution (competitive data), and cost-effectiveness of interaction.

But before charging in, please read this "self-defense" guide first:

  • Regulatory risks.
  • Do not participate with funds you cannot afford to lose.
  • Prediction markets are susceptible to bot manipulation, market manipulation, and insider trading.
  • Participating in prediction market interactions requires you to have some judgment ability regarding news hotspots, sports events, or crypto industry dynamics.
  • Read the resolution rules clearly, including the contract's specified sources, whether the deadline includes the day itself, wording traps, etc.
  • If you place bets blindly just to刷 interactions, you will most likely face the risk of losing your principal. Data from Hubble AI shows that "on Polymarket, the most active retail trader group (mid-frequency), although having the highest win rate on the platform, has a median actual return close to zero due to limitations in capital efficiency and a lack of systematic advantage."
  • Try hedging strategies: For uncertain prediction markets, avoid one-sided bets; try cross-platform hedging instead. Although there is price difference and slippage wear, this can minimize the risk of one-sided betting and focus on刷 trading volume. It is particularly important to note that no trading strategy can completely avoid risk; carefully evaluate when operating.

Polymarket

Why is it worth attention?

  • Leader in prediction markets;
  • Cumulative financing exceeds $22 billion, including a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Polymarket CMO Matthew Modabber confirmed the POLY token and airdrop plan in October 2025.
  • Polymarket has been approved by the CFTC to launch in the US and is returning to the US market.
  • Strong expectations for a token launch and retrospective airdrop in 2026.

How competitive is it?

  • Nearly 920,000 cumulative traders, a large user base.
  • Monthly active users have remained above 460,000 for the last 3 months, indicating stable user stickiness.
  • Weekly trading volume has been above $1 billion in recent weeks.
  • The average number of transactions per active wallet per day increased from less than 10 in December 2025 to a peak of 23 in early January, showing a surge in trading activity.
  • In terms of average bet size, 20.69% of users average bets below $10, 30.35% average between $10 and $50, 23.91% average between $100 and $500, and 0.24% average over $10,000.

Is it worth interacting with?

Worth participating, but costs must be strictly controlled. As a heavily competitive project, its potential airdrop scale is highly attractive. However, Polymarket's mature user ecosystem means a large number of historical traders have already occupied part of the retrospective airdrop quota. New users should rationally evaluate the input-output ratio. In October 2025, according to Bloomberg, Polymarket was in early talks with investors to raise funds at a valuation of $120-150 billion, a more than tenfold increase from four months prior, indicating continuous appreciation of the project's value.

Kalshi

Why is it worth attention?

  • Cumulative financing is close to $16 billion. The most recent Series E round occurred in December 2025, raising $1 billion at an $11 billion valuation, with participation from Sequoia, a16z, ARK Invest, Y Combinator, etc., doubling the valuation compared to the $3 billion financing in October 2025.
  • Regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
  • Kalshi has not officially disclosed any token or airdrop plans. However, based on its recent expansion into the crypto ecosystem, community analysis suggests airdrop expectations exist.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume reached $30 billion.
  • Notional trading volume has been spiraling upward since August 2025, with recent weeks seeing volumes between $1.5 billion and $2 billion, showing steady growth momentum.
  • Total number of trades is close to 130 million, placing its trading activity at the forefront of the prediction market field.

Is it worth interacting with?

Participate cautiously, low cost-effectiveness. On one hand, the project has no clear token issuance or airdrop timeline, making it highly uncertain; on the other hand, Kalshi charges transaction fees, making刷 volume costly. Furthermore, its mature business model suggests a relatively lower need for token incentives, making the likelihood of an airdrop relatively limited.

Opinion

Why is it worth attention?

  • Opinion is one of the fastest-growing prediction markets, with growth rates significantly领先 most competitors in the same period.
  • Opinion was selected for the 7th season of YZi Labs' MVB accelerator program in 2024.
  • Opinion completed a $5 million seed round led by YZi Labs in March 2025. In December, the Opinion team disclosed receiving additional tens of millions of dollars in funding support.
  • Opinion launched a points system simultaneously with its mainnet launch in October 2025, indicating clear airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • From October 2025 to present, Opinion's cumulative notional trading volume reached $15.3 billion, second only to Polymarket ($44.8 billion) and Kalshi ($30 billion).
  • Current Opinion TVL exceeds $140 million.
  • Over 170,000 cumulative traders.
  • The number of daily trading users reached over 40,000 from late December to early January, and has been between 10,000 and 20,000 users in the last 10 days.

Is it worth interacting with?

Quite competitive, but with clear airdrop expectations and strong backing from YZi Labs. Note that weekly trading volume needs to exceed $200 to steadily earn weekly leaderboard points. Points weight covers multiple dimensions including limit order liquidity provision, trade size, holding time bonus, etc., requiring a reasonable interaction strategy.

Predict.fun

Why is it worth attention?

  • Predict.fun was selected for the second season of YZi Labs' incubation program EASY Residency in December 2025.
  • Predict.fun is a BNB Chain native prediction market incubated and invested in by YZi Labs. Founder dingaling previously caused controversy due to the failure of boop.fun and "rat trading" allegations, and was criticized by Changpeng Zhao (CZ), though they later reconciled, and the negative impact has gradually subsided.
  • Predict.fun integrates with the Venus protocol, allowing users to continuously generate yield on funds used for betting during the waiting period for results (applicable to some short-term markets).
  • Features a points mechanism, with explicit airdrop expectations.

How competitive is it?

  • Cumulative notional trading volume of $320 million, with prediction trading volume exceeding $200 million.
  • 478,000 cumulative trades, 36,000 cumulative unique trading users, averaging 13 trades per user.
  • Since mid-December, daily active users have mostly been between 2,000 and 4,000, indicating a relatively small user base.
  • Current TVL is approximately $22.58 million.

Is it worth interacting with?

Medium to low competition. Compared to Polymarket, where mostly veterans and institutions博弈, most people on Predict.fun place bets just to刷 interactions. Strategies to accumulate PP points include trading on the platform, providing meaningful liquidity, holding positions, etc.

Probable

Why is it worth attention?

  • Probable is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs, with orthodox backing.
  • Probable launched a points program on January 12, 2026, though it currently only supports earning points through invitations.
  • Zero transaction fees.

How competitive is it?

  • Since December 18, 2025, cumulative notional trading volume is $560 million, with prediction trading volume reaching $380 million.
  • 12,389 cumulative users. From late December 2025 to early January 2026, daily active users were between 500 and 1,000. Since early January, daily activity has gradually increased, with single-day DAU above 4,000 on both January 14 and 15.
  • 834,357 cumulative trades, averaging 67 trades per user.
  • Average trade size is $425, average total trading size per user is $3,357.

Is it worth interacting with?

Low competition. Probable launched in mid-December and is currently in its early stages. Note that referrers must first complete $100 in cumulative trading volume to unlock and generate an invitation code. Additionally, as a project incubated by PancakeSwap, its token is highly likely to launch through PancakeSwap's CAKE.PAD and might even be listed directly on Binance.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main risks mentioned for participating in prediction markets?

AThe main risks include regulatory uncertainty, potential loss of capital, susceptibility to bot manipulation and insider trading, the need for knowledge about current events to make informed bets, and the importance of understanding market rules to avoid pitfalls.

QWhich prediction market is considered the leader and has received over $22 billion in funding, including a strategic investment from ICE?

APolymarket is considered the leader in the prediction market space and has received over $22 billion in cumulative funding, which includes a $20 billion strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.

QWhat is a key strategy suggested to minimize risk when participating in prediction markets for airdrop farming?

AA key risk mitigation strategy is to use a hedging approach by placing opposing bets on the same market across different platforms. While this incurs some cost from spreads and slippage, it significantly reduces the risk of a single-sided bet, allowing a user to focus on generating trading volume.

QAccording to the article, which prediction market has an explicit points system and a strong expectation of an airdrop?

AOpinion has an explicit points system that was launched with its mainnet in October 2025, creating a strong expectation within the community that it will conduct an airdrop.

QWhich newly launched prediction market is noted for having low competition (low 'roll' or '卷') and is incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs?

AProbable is the newly launched prediction market noted for its low level of competition. It is co-incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs and is still in its early stages of growth.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 22m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 22m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 30m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 30m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 34m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 34m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 41m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 41m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 50m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 50m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow