From Exchanges to Hotels: USDT is Penetrating Real-World Consumption Scenes

比推Publicado em 2025-12-26Última atualização em 2025-12-26

Resumo

Trip.com, the overseas version of Chinese travel giant Ctrip, has begun accepting stablecoin payments in USDT and USDC for global users. A real-world test in Vietnam confirmed the functionality, allowing a hotel booking to be completed in under 10 minutes using USDT. Notably, payments with USDT offered significant savings, with flight bookings being approximately 18% cheaper and hotel bookings around 2.35% cheaper compared to traditional payment methods. The service, powered by Singapore-based licensed payment gateway Triple-A, supports multiple blockchains including Ethereum, Tron, and Solana. A key privacy benefit was noted: booking a hotel with USDT required only a name and email, minimizing personal data collection. This development is particularly significant for the vast global population without access to international credit cards. The article contextualizes this move within a broader trend of major corporations, from PayPal and Ant Group to automakers like BYD and Toyota, adopting stablecoins. This shift is often driven by practical necessity in countries experiencing severe local currency devaluation, where stablecoins like USDT have become a critical tool for maintaining financial stability and facilitating cross-border commerce.

Original Author: Joe Zhou, Foresight News

Original Title: Save 18% on Hotel Bookings with USDT, Trip.com's Overseas Version Strongly Promotes Stablecoin Payments

Trip.com, the overseas version of Ctrip, is quietly entering the stablecoin payment track.

On December 25, 2025, Foresight News learned that Trip.com, the overseas version of Ctrip, has launched a stablecoin payment function for global users, currently supporting two USD stablecoins: USDT and USDC. Two sources close to Trip confirmed this information to Foresight News.

After downloading and logging into Trip.com in Vietnam, the author successfully completed a hotel reservation in Nha Trang, Vietnam, using USDT payment in less than 10 minutes.

More notably, after checking the prices of several local hotels, it was found that the price of some hotels on the Trip.com App when paying with USDT was even lower than using the Ctrip official website or traditional payment methods.

Trip.com Overseas Version Already Supports USDT/USDC

On December 24, 2025, the author booked a hotel in Nha Trang, Vietnam, using USDT on the Trip.com overseas version APP, and on December 25, purchased a plane ticket from Nha Trang to Ho Chi Minh City with USDT, both showing successful payment. The author has now successfully checked into the hotel.

The author found that the flight ticket purchased with USDT on Trip.com saved approximately 18% of the cost compared to the ticket purchased on Ctrip. The hotel booked with USDT saved 2.35% of the cost.

Trip has enabled USDT and USDC payments

Currently, Trip.com's crypto payments support multiple public chains including Ethereum, Tron, Polygon, Solana, Arbitrum One, and TON.

During the actual payment process, the author noticed the presence of another payment company, Triple-A. This company provides crypto payment-related services to Trip.com. Public information shows that Triple-A is a licensed crypto payment institution headquartered in Singapore, mainly providing payment gateway and settlement services for cryptocurrencies and stablecoins.

Furthermore, the author learned that Triple-A is also cooperating with Singapore's internet giant Grab as a technical partner for the crypto payment channel, enabling GrabPay users to directly use crypto assets to top up their wallet balance within the Grab app.

Additionally, the author noticed a detail:

When booking a hotel on Trip.com using USDT, there is no need to fill in detailed personal information; only a name and email are required to complete the order. This means that when using USDT for payment in hotel scenarios, the platform can hardly obtain the user's complete privacy information. Of course, if purchasing a flight ticket, information such as nationality, passport number, and phone number are still required—this is a compliance requirement of the aviation industry itself.

Privacy and data security have become major social issues.

Just this month, the Ctrip Group encountered a relatively significant "public trust incident." In December, Ctrip Group and the Cambodia National Tourism Administration signed a marketing cooperation agreement in Shanghai. After the news was announced, it sparked concerns among some users about local security, telecom fraud risks, and personal information security. A large number of screenshots of uninstalling the Ctrip App appeared on social media.

In many overseas regions, users are far more sensitive to privacy and information security than in the domestic market. This may also be an important practical background for Trip.com's promotion of stablecoin payments.

For travelers around the world without international credit cards, stablecoin payment is a new path. According to public information, the number of people globally who own credit cards is approximately 125 million to 130 million, and the number of people with international credit cards is even lower, which also means that over 80% of the global population cannot smoothly use the international credit card system.

Credit cards are not merely "payment tools" but an entry point to the credit system; however, most people globally are not within this system. In many countries and regions, such as Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa, and India, many people cannot be incorporated into the credit system. This also prevents them from having credit cards.

Stablecoin payments are providing these people with a global payment path that bypasses the credit system.

Of course, the practical problems of stablecoins still exist: transaction fees remain relatively high and unstable.

During the actual payment process, the author found significant differences in fees between different wallets. When paying to Trip.com's USDT收款码 (receiving QR code) via Binance, a fee of 1 USDT was required, with a minimum transfer threshold of 10 USDT; whereas when using Bitget Wallet, the first transaction showed a fee of 0, the second showed a fee of 2.39 USDT, and no minimum transfer amount was set. The differences may be related to the public chain used (Tron) and its fee mechanism.

Why Are Giants Entering the Stablecoin Space One After Another?

Ctrip Group is not the first company to enter the stablecoin track.

Previously, several global internet and payment giants have clearly布局 (laid out plans for) stablecoins, including Ant Group, JD.com, Paypal, Stripe, Meta (Facebook), Grab, and TADA.

Several banking giants have also publicly stated their entry into the stablecoin field, for example, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley.

Some实体制造业企业 (physical manufacturing companies) are also接入 (integrating) stablecoin payments. Public reports show that some dealers of BYD (Build Your Dreams) in Bolivia already support USDT payments; manufacturing companies like Toyota and Yamaha also accept stablecoin settlements in overseas markets. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has publicly confirmed this.

Advertisement for cooperation between BYD dealers and USDT

Internet giants,实体制造业巨头 (physical manufacturing giants), banking giants are all布局 (laying out plans for) stablecoins... Their use cases for stablecoins vary.

An obvious trend is that payment giants like PayPal and Ant Group are no longer satisfied with仅仅作为 (merely being) the payment entry for stablecoins but hope to directly become the issuers of stablecoins. PayPal has already launched PYUSD; Ant Group is also promoting the application for a Hong Kong dollar stablecoin license. The boundary between payment institutions and currency issuance is being reshaped.

For实体制造业企业 (physical manufacturing enterprises) like BYD and Toyota, there is no ideological judgment about stablecoins or crypto payments, only one practical question: which method are users more willing to pay with.

Fiat Currency Continues to Depreciate, Stablecoins Become the "Practical Solution"

In Bolivia, the official fiat currency, the Boliviano (BOB), depreciated against the US dollar by 65%–137% from the end of 2024 to mid-2025. It can be said that Bolivia's fiat currency depreciates every day.

In this environment, any company expanding overseas cannot long bear the exchange losses brought by settlement in the local currency. USDT has gradually become the de facto payment tool locally.

And Bolivia is not an isolated case but a phenomenon simultaneously上演 (playing out) in multiple countries around the world.

The author visited Iran, Turkey, Egypt, and other countries this year and found that the cumulative depreciation of these economies' national currencies against the US dollar over the past three years generally exceeded 80%; stretched over a five-year周期 (cycle), the currencies of Iran, Turkey, and Egypt have all depreciated by more than 200% against the US dollar.

Currency depreciation is evolving from a "local risk" in a few countries to a broader, more structural global phenomenon.

At the black market in Tehran, Iran's capital, the author is witnessing a currency transaction

More残酷的是 (cruelly), in the aforementioned countries (the countries mentioned above), the speed of local currency depreciation has long far exceeded the income growth rate of ordinary people. In real transactions, monetary disorder is directly changing people's payment methods.

This is precisely why consumer internet platforms like Trip.com Overseas Version and Grab; payment giants like PayPal and Ant Group; and physical manufacturing companies like BYD and Toyota have begun to尝试引入 (try to introduce) USDT and other stablecoins in different markets.

The world is partially collapsing, with some regions率先失衡 (becoming unbalanced first).

When the existing financial system can no longer perform the functions of stability, settlement, and trust, a new economic system is pushed to the forefront by reality.

The new economic system is not designed but is "forced" out by reality where the old system fails. The spread of stablecoins is not because they are ideal enough, but because in some places, they are already the least bad choice available.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Article Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598412

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main development announced regarding Trip.com and stablecoins?

ATrip.com, the overseas version of Ctrip, has globally launched a stablecoin payment feature, supporting both USDT and USDC for hotel and flight purchases.

QWhich payment processing company is mentioned as providing crypto payment services for Trip.com?

ATriple-A, a licensed crypto payment institution based in Singapore, is the payment company providing crypto payment gateway and settlement services for Trip.com.

QWhat practical benefit did the author experience when using USDT to book a flight on Trip.com?

AThe author saved approximately 18% on a flight ticket purchased with USDT on Trip.com compared to the price when using traditional payment methods on the Ctrip website.

QAccording to the article, what is a major global issue that is driving the adoption of stablecoins like USDT?

ARapid and severe devaluation of national currencies in many countries (e.g., Bolivia, Iran, Turkey, Egypt) is making stablecoins a more reliable payment and store of value, as they are pegged to the US dollar.

QBesides Trip.com, name two other types of major companies that are adopting or exploring stablecoin payments.

APayment giants like PayPal and Ant Group, as well as manufacturing companies like BYD and Toyota, are adopting or exploring stablecoin payments in various markets.

Leituras Relacionadas

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbitHá 34m

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbitHá 34m

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

The CLARITY Act has encountered a new obstacle as a bipartisan Senate group's agreement on ethics provisions collapsed. Republicans reportedly reversed their position on a key element that would have allowed state attorneys general to sue the Department of Justice for failing to enforce ethics rules related to President Trump. Democrats viewed this as an "about face" from a prior tentative deal. As a counter-proposal, Republicans suggested limiting enforcement authority to the Attorney General and mentioned impeachment as a potential remedy for violations. The impasse leaves the crypto market structure bill's path to a full Senate vote uncertain. Another major hurdle involves law enforcement groups' concerns that the bill could hinder investigations into blockchain-related crimes like money laundering. The White House Crypto Council is scheduled to meet with these groups to address these issues, particularly around the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Key Democratic senators have stated their support for the CLARITY Act is contingent on adequately addressing both ethics and law enforcement concerns.

bitcoinistHá 1h

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

bitcoinistHá 1h

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbitHá 2h

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbitHá 2h

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

Japan's three largest banks—MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., and Mizuho Bank—are advancing plans to launch a jointly-issued yen-pegged stablecoin by the end of fiscal year 2026 (March 31, 2027). They have established a voluntary council to develop the operational framework, governance, and issuance infrastructure for the token, which will be issued under a trust agreement. The move aligns with Japan's regulatory push to expand its yen-based digital asset market, following 2022 amendments to the Payment Services Act that restrict stablecoin issuance to licensed entities like banks and trust companies. The banks, which began exploring this initiative in late 2025, aim to support a wide range of use cases and are considering future collaborations with other financial institutions. This development occurs alongside other yen-stablecoin launches and recent political proposals to promote such tokens for settlement in Asia.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

bitcoinistHá 2h

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight NewsHá 2h

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?