Fragmentation drains up to $1.3B a year from tokenized assets: Report

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-19Última atualização em 2025-12-19

Resumo

Fragmentation across blockchain networks is causing significant economic drain in the tokenized asset market, with inefficiencies costing up to $1.3 billion annually, according to a report from RWA.io. The lack of interoperability traps liquidity and prevents capital from moving freely, causing identical or economically equivalent real-world assets (RWAs) to trade at price differences of 1% to 3% across different chains. These inefficiencies hinder arbitrage and price discovery. Additionally, moving capital between chains results in transaction losses of 2% to 5% due to fees, slippage, and operational risks. If unresolved, these issues could escalate to $30–75 billion in annual losses as the tokenized RWA market grows to an estimated $16–30 trillion by 2030. Despite these challenges, tokenized assets continue gaining adoption, with recent moves by companies like Securitize and Coinbase to launch onchain stock trading.

Fragmentation across blockchain networks is already imposing a measurable economic cost on the tokenized asset market, with inefficiencies translating into up to $1.3 billion in annual value drag.

In a report sent to Cointelegraph, real-world asset (RWA) data provider RWA.io argued that while blockchains accelerated innovation, they also created walls that trap liquidity and prevent capital from moving freely across networks.

As a result, tokenized RWAs have increasingly behaved like disconnected markets rather than a single, unified financial system. The research found that identical or economically equivalent assets routinely trade at different prices across chains, while moving capital between networks remained costly and complex.

Researchers stated that these inefficiencies hinder the market’s ability to self-correct through arbitrage, a mechanism that facilitates efficient price discovery.

“This fragmentation is the single greatest impediment to the market realizing its multi-trillion-dollar potential,” said Marko Vidrih, co-founder and chief operating officer at RWA.io.

“In traditional finance, the EU-wide SEPA Instant mandate shows how value can move across accounts in seconds. Tokenized assets should be just as frictionless,” Vidrih added.

RWA market growth from 2020 to 2025. Source: RWA.io

Price inefficiencies and capital friction across chains

The report states that one of the most obvious consequences of fragmentation is the persistent price divergence for identical assets issued on different blockchains.

According to the report, economically identical tokenized assets often trade at spreads of 1% to 3% across major networks, despite representing claims on the same underlying assets. In traditional finance, arbitrage would quickly eliminate such market gaps.

However, crosschain arbitrage remains unviable due to technical hurdles, fees, delays and operational risks, the report claims. It states that the costs to relocate assets often exceed the price discrepancy, allowing inefficiencies to persist.

Beyond price discovery, RWA.io estimated that moving capital between non-interoperable chains results in losses of 2% to 5% per transaction. This is because of exchange fees, slippage, transfer costs, gas fees and timing risks. In aggregate, the report models an average loss of about 3.5% per capital reallocation.

Should these fragmentation patterns persist, RWA.io estimated that the friction costs could drain between $600 million $1.3 billion from the market annually.

Economic costs of market fragmentation. Source: RWA.io

RWA.io projects that tokenized real-world assets could grow into a $16 trillion to $30 trillion market by 2030, and warns that if current inefficiencies persist, the associated value drag would scale with it.

Applying today’s fragmentation-related frictions to a market of that size implies potential annual losses of $30 billion to $75 billion, turning infrastructure shortcomings into a material constraint on long-term growth.

Related: Tokenized stocks may be onchain, but the SEC still wants the keys

Tokenized assets gain traction despite inefficiencies

Despite claims of inefficiency, tokenized assets continue to gain traction across both crypto-native platforms and traditional financial institutions. Just this week, companies have made moves to tokenize equities.

On Tuesday, RWA-focused company Securitize announced plans to launch compliant, onchain stock trading.

On Thursday, crypto exchange Coinbase launched a stock trading feature, allowing users to invest directly in stocks through its application.

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the estimated annual economic cost of fragmentation on the tokenized asset market according to the RWA.io report?

AThe report estimates that fragmentation drains between $600 million and $1.3 billion from the tokenized asset market annually.

QWhat is identified as the 'single greatest impediment' to the tokenized asset market reaching its multi-trillion-dollar potential?

AFragmentation across blockchain networks is identified as the single greatest impediment to the market realizing its multi-trillion-dollar potential.

QWhat is the typical price spread for identical tokenized assets trading on different blockchains?

AEconomically identical tokenized assets often trade at spreads of 1% to 3% across major blockchain networks.

QWhy does cross-chain arbitrage fail to correct price inefficiencies in the tokenized asset market?

ACross-chain arbitrage remains unviable due to technical hurdles, fees, delays, operational risks, and the fact that the costs to relocate assets often exceed the price discrepancy.

QWhat is the projected size of the tokenized real-world asset market by 2030, and what could the associated losses be if fragmentation persists?

ARWA.io projects the market could grow to $16 trillion to $30 trillion by 2030. If current inefficiencies persist, the associated annual losses could scale to $30 billion to $75 billion.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 30m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 30m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 49m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 49m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 58m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 58m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar O

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de O1 exchange (O) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu O1 exchange (O)Depois de comprar o teu O1 exchange (O), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona O1 exchange (O)Transaciona facilmente O1 exchange (O) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

167 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar O

Como comprar PROS

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Pharos (PROS) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Pharos (PROS)Depois de comprar o teu Pharos (PROS), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Pharos (PROS)Transaciona facilmente Pharos (PROS) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

160 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar PROS

O que é VERONA

I. Introdução ao Projeto VERONA é uma blockchain construída para todos, em todo o lado, através da abstração da cadeia. Utilizando a sua camada de Abstração Generalizada, a VERONA distingue-se por integrar funcionalidades complexas de blockchain, como contas, assinaturas e interoperabilidade, diretamente ao nível do protocolo. Esta abordagem permite a interação com aplicações de blockchain sem a necessidade de compreender as tecnologias subjacentes.1) Informação Básica Nome: VERONA (VERONA)III. Links Relacionados Link do site oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Mídias Sociais: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: A introdução ao projeto provém dos materiais publicados ou fornecidos pela equipa oficial do projeto, que é apenas para referência e não constitui aconselhamento de investimento. A HTX não se responsabiliza por quaisquer perdas diretas ou indiretas resultantes.

778 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.22

O que é VERONA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de A (A) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片