Former New York City Mayor Rug Pulls Community? Eric Adams’ NYC Token Plunges 81%

ccn.comPublicado em 2026-01-13Última atualização em 2026-01-13

Resumo

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams launched the "NYC Token" on January 12, promoting it as a crypto initiative to fund social causes like combating antisemitism and supporting blockchain education without raising taxes. The token initially surged to a market cap of nearly $600 million shortly after launch. However, it crashed by approximately 81% about 30 minutes later, losing around $500 million in value. On-chain data suggests a wallet linked to the token's deployer removed over $2 million in liquidity, leading to accusations of a "rug pull." This controversy adds to Adams' history of crypto-related scrutiny, including past failures to disclose crypto holdings and using a city-funded trip for political fundraising.

Key Takeaways

  • Former NYC Mayor Eric Adams launched a token to combat antisemitism and promote blockchain education.
  • The token surged to a market cap of approximately $580-600 million shortly after its launch.
  • Not long after launch, the token crashed nearly 80% following a rug pull.

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams has found himself back in the headlines — and not in the way he once hoped.

Adams, who spent years publicly embracing crypto and even took his first mayoral paychecks in Bitcoin, is now facing accusations from the crypto community that a recently launched token amounted to a rug pull.

The controversy marks a sharp reversal for a politician once celebrated as a pro-crypto champion and adds to a growing trail of scrutiny that has followed him beyond City Hall.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
XM.com<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

XM.com

promotions
Get 100% Bonus up to $100 on your first Deposit.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68df7fd8872238d510dfbf06" href="https://clicks.pipaffiliates.com/c?c=1104900&l=en&p=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get 100% Bonus up to $100 on your first Deposit.
Coins
28
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://www.bitunix.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
Earn rewards worth up to 5,000 USDT on your first deposit<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://bonus.bitget.com/CCN12" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn rewards worth up to 5,000 USDT on your first deposit
Coins
88
Claim Offer
ALL TOP CRYPTO BETTING SITES

NYC Token Plunges 81% After Hype-Fueled Launch

Adams unveiled the “NYC Token” on Jan. 12, pitching it as a crypto-powered initiative to fund social causes without raising taxes.

In a series of posts, Adams said the token would support efforts to combat antisemitism and anti-Americanism.

The former Mayor also aimed to promote blockchain education and fund scholarships and awareness programs using the token.

He framed the project as part of his post-mayoral push to position New York City as a global crypto hub, with proceeds earmarked for nonprofits, including advocacy groups, HBCUs, and blockchain literacy initiatives aimed at underserved communities.

The launch initially drew intense attention.

Fueled by Adams’ public profile and social media promotion, the NYC token’s market capitalization surged to nearly $600 million within minutes of going live.

The rally, however, unraveled just as quickly.

Eric Adams’ NYC token plunges 81%. Credit: TradingView

Roughly 30 minutes after launch, the token’s value collapsed by about 81%, falling to around $100 million in market cap and wiping out close to $500 million in paper value.

The sudden reversal sparked immediate backlash across the crypto community.

Many labeled the episode a classic “rug pull” — a scenario in which insiders drain liquidity, leaving retail buyers holding steep losses.

On-chain data supports those concerns.

Analysis shows that a wallet linked to the token’s deployer removed approximately $2.43 million in USDC liquidity shortly after the peak.

About $1.5 million was later returned, leaving roughly $932,000 unaccounted for.

Other estimates put the total liquidity extraction even higher, at around $3.43 million.

Reports suggest that Adams or affiliated wallets may have collected more than $2.5 million in fees through a dynamic liquidity market maker (DLMM) structure.

Adams’ Controversial History

Eric Adams’ tenure as New York City mayor from 2022 to 2025 — and his subsequent political career — has been marked by repeated controversies.

Adams has repeatedly vowed to turn New York City into a global crypto hub. However, that ambition often drew criticism over conflicts of interest and questionable judgment.

He cast himself as a crypto champion early on, famously converting his first mayoral paycheck into Bitcoin to signal his commitment to the industry.

That image began to fray in 2023, when Adams failed to disclose his crypto holdings in required city financial filings.

The omission raised concerns about transparency and ethics, particularly given his vocal advocacy for the crypto industry.

In May 2025, Adams faced further scrutiny after using a city-funded trip to a Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas to raise campaign money from crypto investors.

The trip, which included appearances by New York City’s top tech official, blurred the line between official duties and political fundraising.

Adams also proposed a New York City–backed token, drawing inspiration from MiamiCoin.

Critics argued that these actions treated crypto as a political prop, downplayed real financial risks, and gambled with the city’s reputation.

Beyond crypto, serious legal troubles overshadowed Adams’ tenure.

In September 2024, he became the first sitting New York City mayor to be indicted on federal charges, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S., wire fraud, soliciting foreign campaign contributions, and bribery.

Crypto has increasingly become a political talking point over the past five years.

Candidates across the spectrum are promising pro-crypto policies to court a growing voter base.

In many cases, however, those promises have fallen flat, reinforcing criticism that crypto is often used more as a campaign tool than a genuine policy priority.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the stated purpose of the NYC Token launched by former Mayor Eric Adams?

AThe NYC Token was launched to combat antisemitism and anti-Americanism, promote blockchain education, and fund scholarships and awareness programs without raising taxes.

QHow much did the market capitalization of the NYC Token drop shortly after its launch?

AThe market capitalization of the NYC Token dropped by approximately 81%, falling from nearly $600 million to around $100 million.

QWhat on-chain activity suggests the NYC Token incident was a rug pull?

AA wallet linked to the token's deployer removed approximately $2.43 million in USDC liquidity shortly after the peak, with about $1.5 million later returned and $932,000 unaccounted for.

QWhat were some of the controversies Eric Adams' tenure as mayor was marked by?

AHis tenure was marked by failing to disclose crypto holdings, using a city-funded trip to a Bitcoin conference for political fundraising, and being indicted on federal charges including conspiracy, wire fraud, and bribery.

QHow did Eric Adams initially signal his commitment to the crypto industry as mayor?

AHe converted his first mayoral paycheck into Bitcoin to signal his commitment to turning New York City into a global crypto hub.

Leituras Relacionadas

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbitHá 7m

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbitHá 7m

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbitHá 14m

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbitHá 14m

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbitHá 52m

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbitHá 52m

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbitHá 56m

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbitHá 56m

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbitHá 56m

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbitHá 56m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片