First Batch of Keynote Speakers and Partners Announced! Web2+3 Summit: Defining the Next Generation of Digital Economy

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-20Última atualização em 2026-04-20

Resumo

Web2+3 Summit: Defining the Next Generation of Digital Economy The 6th BEYOND International Technology Innovation Expo (BEYOND Expo 2026), Asia's largest tech and ecosystem exhibition, is launching a dedicated Web2+3 stage for the first time. Co-hosted by BEYOND Expo and ChainNeXT Group, the Web3 Summit will take place from May 28–30, 2026. Against the backdrop of accelerating global tech integration, the boundaries between Web2 and Web3 are rapidly blurring. With clearer global regulations for blockchain-driven internet (Web3) and the special issuance of a Hong Kong dollar stable币 license by the Hong Kong SAR government on April 10, 2026, Web3's decentralized principles are quickly merging with traditional industries (Web2) such as e-commerce, finance, and artificial intelligence. Focused on blockchain-driven digital economy elements, the summit will center on three core principles—implementability, commercial viability, and compliance. It will bring together top Web3 experts to discuss key integration areas like stablecoin payment finance (PayFi), real-world asset tokenization (RWA), and decentralized AI (DeAI), unveiling new opportunities for industrial innovation. The first wave of confirmed speakers includes Jack Kong (Director of Hong Kong Cyberport, Chairman of Nano Labs), Yat Siu (Chairman of Animoca Brands), Michael Wu (Co-founder & CEO of Amber Group), Michael Heinrich (Co-founder & CEO of 0G), and Art Abal (Co-founder of Vana). More Web3 ecosystem pioneers, AI,...

Asia's largest technology innovation and ecosystem expo, the sixth BEYOND International Technology Innovation Expo (hereinafter referred to as "BEYOND Expo 2026"), has officially announced the establishment of a dedicated Web2+3 stage for the first time. As one of the important segments of BEYOND Expo, the Web3 segment will be jointly hosted by BEYOND Expo and ChainNeXT Group (链新ChainNeXT) from May 28 to 30, 2026!

Against the backdrop of accelerating integration in the global technology industry, the boundaries between Web2 and Web3 are rapidly merging. Legislation regarding blockchain-driven internet (Web3) is becoming increasingly clear in various countries, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government officially issued licenses for Hong Kong dollar stablecoins on April 10, 2026. The decentralized concept of Web3 is rapidly integrating with traditional industries (Web2), such as cross-border e-commerce, finance, artificial intelligence, and more.

This summit focuses on exploring the elements of blockchain digital economy, centering around the three core principles of "implementable, commercializable, and compliant." It will invite top experts from the Web3 industry to delve into directions such as stablecoin payment finance (PayFi), tokenization of traditional financial assets (RWA), and decentralized artificial intelligence (DeAI) in combination with industries, revealing new opportunities for industrial innovation!

First Batch of Speakers Announced

This Web2+3 summit brings together global Web3 industry leaders, traditional industry giants, investment institutions, and regulatory experts. The first batch of confirmed speakers for the forum includes:Jack Kong(Director of Hong Kong Cyberport, Chairman of Nano Labs), Yat Siu(Chairman of Animoca Brands), Michael Wu(Co-founder and CEO of Amber Group), Michael Heinrich(Co-founder and CEO of 0G), Art Abal(Co-founder of Vana).

More Web3 ecosystem leaders, AI, and fintech experts will be announced in the near future.

Core Forum Topics

This Web2+3 summit will focus on new digital infrastructure and industrial innovation. Detailed thematic forums include:

Web2+DeAI Forum: The New Paradigm of AI Driven by Decentralized Infrastructure

Web2+RWA Forum: Tokenization of Real-World Assets and Global Liquidity

Web2+PayFi Forum: Cross-Border Payment and Financial Innovation Driven by Crypto Infrastructure

Web2+3 AI Forum: Autonomous Agents and Crypto Economics

Web2+3 Wealth Forum: Investment Ecosystem Integrating On-Chain and Off-Chain

Web2+3 Commerce Forum: New Landscape of Global Trade Driven by Stablecoins

More detailed agenda will be announced陆续.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of the Web2+3 Summit at BEYOND Expo 2026?

AThe Web2+3 Summit focuses on the integration of Web2 and Web3 technologies, exploring blockchain-driven digital economy elements with core principles of being 'actionable, commercializable, and compliant'. It covers areas like stablecoin payment finance (PayFi), real-world asset tokenization (RWA), and decentralized AI (DeAI).

QWho are some of the confirmed keynote speakers for the Web2+3 Summit?

AConfirmed speakers include Jack Kong (Director of Hong Kong Cyberport, Chairman of Nano Labs), Yat Siu (Chairman of Animoca Brands), Michael Wu (Co-founder and CEO of Amber Group), Michael Heinrich (Co-founder and CEO of 0G), and Art Abal (Co-founder of Vana).

QWhat are the key thematic forums to be discussed at the Web2+3 Summit?

AKey forums include Web2+DeAI (decentralized infrastructure-driven AI), Web2+RWA (real-world asset tokenization and global liquidity), Web2+PayFi (crypto infrastructure-driven cross-border payments and financial innovation), Web2+3 AI (autonomous agents and crypto economy), Web2+3 Wealth (on-chain and off-chain integrated investment ecosystems), and Web2+3 Commerce (stablecoin-driven global trade).

QWhen and where will the Web2+3 Summit take place?

AThe Web2+3 Summit will be held from May 28 to 30, 2026, as part of the BEYOND International Technology Innovation Expo, co-hosted by BEYOND Expo and ChainNeXT Group.

QHow does the summit address the convergence of Web2 and Web3 technologies?

AThe summit explores the rapid merging of Web3's decentralized concepts with traditional Web2 industries such as e-commerce, finance, and AI, highlighting innovations in regulatory frameworks, stablecoin adoption, and practical applications that bridge both ecosystems.

Leituras Relacionadas

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbitHá 25m

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbitHá 25m

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbitHá 25m

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbitHá 25m

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbitHá 1h

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbitHá 1h

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手Há 1h

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手Há 1h

World Cup Upset! Polymarket User Loses Nearly $1 Million

A prediction market trader lost nearly $1 million after underdog Cape Verde held soccer powerhouse Spain to a 0-0 draw in their World Cup group stage match. On Polymarket, a user named "betoor619" had built a roughly $1.1 million position when Spain's implied win probability was around 92%, a low-risk, low-return strategy that backfired spectacularly. The result defied models like Goldman Sachs', which gave Spain a 25% championship probability. Cape Verde's 40-year-old goalkeeper, Vozinha, was the hero with seven key saves. The event highlights the growing scale of crypto-based prediction markets like Polymarket, where total trading volume for this single match reached $64 million.

marsbitHá 1h