Fintech Stablecoins Just Got a Boost in South Korea as Lawmakers Oppose 51% Rule

ccn.comPublicado em 2025-12-23Última atualização em 2025-12-23

Resumo

South Korea is preparing to regulate stablecoins by 2026, with a key debate between the Bank of Korea (BoK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC). The BoK supports a "51% rule" that would limit the issuance of KRW-backed stablecoins to entities majority-owned by banks, arguing that non-bank issuance could cause chaos. In contrast, the FSC favors a more open approach, allowing fintech companies to participate to encourage innovation. Recently, the Democratic Party of Korea’s Digital Asset Task Force expressed opposition to the BoK’s proposal, siding with the FSC. They argue that restricting stablecoin issuance to banks could hinder innovation and reduce competitiveness with global standards.

Key Takeaways

The Bank of Korea wants to limit KRW stablecoin issuance to entities that are at least 51% owned by banks.
Meanwhile, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulation.
With legislation expected in 2026, influential lawmakers have sided with the FSC.

As South Korea prepares to regulate stablecoins in 2026, one question has come to dominate the policy debate.

Should legislation enshrine a role for banks in law, or should South Korea’s stablecoin market be open to a broader range of fintech players?

The latter position recently got a major boost from the Democratic Party of Korea’s Digital Asset Task Force, which looks set to oppose the central bank’s “51% rule.”

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers

Tangem

promotions

Trusted & Secure

Coins

Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

South Korea’s 51% Rule for Stablecoin Issuers

Calls to anchor Won-backed stablecoins in the banking sector have been spearheaded by the Bank of Korea (BoK).

For instance, in July, BoK Governor Rhee Chang-yong cautioned that “If we allow non-banks to issue stablecoins, this will cause major chaos.”

To ensure banks have a controlling stake in the new market, the central bank has drawn up draft proposals for the Digital Asset Basic Act that would require stablecoin issuers to be at least 51% owned by licensed banks.

Any such provision would ensure that banking consortia effectively control South Korea’s stablecoin supply, while fintechs would be relegated to the sidelines, only ever able to play a supporting role.

However, as Digital Asset Basic Act negotiations enter the final stretch, powerful forces within the National Assembly are opposed to the 51% rule.

Digital Asset Task Force Opposes Stablecoin Restrictions

Opponents of the BoK’s proposal argue that limiting fintech involvement risks stifling innovation and would bring South Korea out of line with emerging global standards.

For instance, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) is reportedly preparing an alternative legislative draft that doesn’t include the 51% rule.

And there are signs that it has the support of National Assembly lawmakers.

According to Ahn Do-geol, who leads the Digital Asset Task Force, a majority of the 20 experts on the group’s advisory committee expressed concerns about the BoK’s proposal.

“They argue that this governance structure could make it difficult to achieve the innovation and network effects that stablecoins are intended to achieve,” he observed, per local media reports .

“Issuers should be selected based on their ability to advance innovation rather than their institutional classification,” the lawmaker added.

Recommended Secure Partners

Safest Exchanges Best Safest (Most Secure) Crypto Exchanges? Check Out These Exchanges
File Crypto Taxes Easily Reviews of Top Crypto Tax Software
Play Crypto Poker Best PvP Crypto Poker Sites

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the '51% rule' proposed by the Bank of Korea for stablecoin issuance?

AThe '51% rule' is a draft proposal from the Bank of Korea that would require any entity issuing KRW-backed stablecoins to be at least 51% owned by licensed banks, ensuring banks have a controlling stake in the stablecoin market.

QWhich South Korean regulatory body favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulations and opposes the 51% rule?

AThe Financial Services Commission (FSC) favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulation and is preparing an alternative legislative draft that does not include the 51% rule.

QWhat is the name of the political group that has recently opposed the Bank of Korea's stablecoin proposal?

AThe Democratic Party of Korea's Digital Asset Task Force, led by Ahn Do-geol, has expressed opposition to the Bank of Korea's '51% rule'.

QWhat is the main argument against the Bank of Korea's proposal to restrict stablecoin issuance to bank-dominated entities?

AOpponents argue that the restriction would stifle innovation, make it difficult to achieve the intended network effects of stablecoins, and bring South Korea out of line with emerging global standards.

QBy what year is stablecoin legislation expected to be introduced in South Korea?

AStablecoin legislation is expected to be introduced in South Korea in 2026.

Leituras Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHá 47m

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHá 47m

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHá 47m

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHá 47m

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHá 52m

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHá 52m

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHá 1h

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHá 1h

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 2h

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar O

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de O1 exchange (O) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu O1 exchange (O)Depois de comprar o teu O1 exchange (O), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona O1 exchange (O)Transaciona facilmente O1 exchange (O) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

468 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar PROS

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Pharos (PROS) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Pharos (PROS)Depois de comprar o teu Pharos (PROS), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Pharos (PROS)Transaciona facilmente Pharos (PROS) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

493 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

O que é VERONA

I. Introdução ao Projeto VERONA é uma blockchain construída para todos, em todo o lado, através da abstração da cadeia. Utilizando a sua camada de Abstração Generalizada, a VERONA distingue-se por integrar funcionalidades complexas de blockchain, como contas, assinaturas e interoperabilidade, diretamente ao nível do protocolo. Esta abordagem permite a interação com aplicações de blockchain sem a necessidade de compreender as tecnologias subjacentes.1) Informação Básica Nome: VERONA (VERONA)III. Links Relacionados Link do site oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Mídias Sociais: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: A introdução ao projeto provém dos materiais publicados ou fornecidos pela equipa oficial do projeto, que é apenas para referência e não constitui aconselhamento de investimento. A HTX não se responsabiliza por quaisquer perdas diretas ou indiretas resultantes.

1.2k Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.22

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de A (A) são apresentadas abaixo.

Fintech Stablecoins Just Got a Boost in South Korea as Lawmakers Oppose 51% Rule

Resumo

Tangem

BitBox

Blockstream

South Korea’s 51% Rule for Stablecoin Issuers

Digital Asset Task Force Opposes Stablecoin Restrictions

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

Leituras Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

Trading

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar O

Como comprar PROS

O que é VERONA

Discussões

Categorias populares

Etiquetas Populares