Finance Goes 'Invisible': How Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Arteries of the Digital Economy

比推Publicado em 2025-12-22Última atualização em 2025-12-22

Resumo

This article explores the transformative role of stablecoins as the "new arteries" of the digital economy, moving finance into an "invisible" infrastructure layer. Key developments include Coinbase's major product upgrades, positioning it as an "Everything Exchange" that integrates trading, derivatives, stablecoins, and AI-driven services. Stablecoin adoption is accelerating, with Visa now allowing USDC settlements within the U.S. banking system, marking a structural shift in settlement layers. Regulatory progress is evident as U.S. authorities conditionally approve federal trust bank charters for firms like Ripple and Circle, while the FDIC advances stablecoin rules. New stablecoin products and payments integrations are emerging, such as PayPal's PYUSD for YouTube creator payouts and ADNOC's adoption of a national stablecoin at gas stations. Major financial institutions, including JPMorgan, are actively exploring tokenized deposits and assets on public blockchains. The growth of gold-backed stablecoins and national strategies like the UAE's push for asset tokenization further highlight the expansion of stablecoins beyond pure currency use cases into broader economic infrastructure. However, JPMorgan analysis suggests stablecoin growth may be limited by competition from bank-issued tokenized deposits and CBDCs, projecting a market cap of $500-600 billion by 2028.

Author: Cobo

Original Title: Finance Goes 'Invisible': How Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Arteries of the Digital Economy

This week's highlights:

This week, Coinbase hosted a system-level product launch event with the scale of WWDC, unveiling updates across trading, derivatives, stablecoins, AI, and payment protocols. Coinbase's vision of an "Everything Exchange" not only reflects its ambition to become a super app but also points to a new implementation path for the crypto era—a foundational financial structure centered on stablecoins, asset issuance, and on-chain settlement. Financial capabilities thus become a basic resource, like internet bandwidth, that can be natively called by software and AI and automatically scheduled in the background. Stablecoins have evolved from investment products into infrastructure supporting the operation of the digital economy. In this context, we can say that Coinbase's boundaries extend beyond traditional internet super apps, and finance is beginning to detach from apps, moving towards an omnipresent "invisible finance."

Meanwhile, the mainstream adoption of stablecoins continues to accelerate. On one hand, this is evident in user-perceivable daily scenarios: the UAE's largest fuel retailer, ADNOC, now accepts stablecoin payments at nearly a thousand gas stations; Interactive Brokers supports stablecoin deposits; the fintech company Ramp, which serves businesses, enables direct stablecoin payments for paper checks; YouTube supports creators receiving payments in PayPal's stablecoin PYUSD. Stablecoins are rapidly entering corporate finance and consumer systems. On the other hand, more profound changes are occurring at a level almost imperceptible to users. Visa has launched USDC settlement within the U.S. banking system, allowing certain banks to fulfill settlement obligations directly on VisaNet using USDC. This marks a structural重构 of the settlement layer, happening deep within the banking system—more隐蔽 yet far more impactful.

Market Overview and Growth Highlights

The total market capitalization of stablecoins reached $308.606 billion, decreasing by $1.456 billion week-over-week. In terms of market structure, USDT maintains its dominant position, accounting for 60.32%; USDC ranks second with a market cap of $77.336 billion, representing 25.06%.

Blockchain Network Distribution

Top three networks by stablecoin market cap:

  1. Ethereum: $166.19b

  2. Tron: $80.993b

  3. Solana: $16.048b

Top 3 networks with the highest weekly growth:

<ol class="list-paddingleft-2" style='white-space: normal; border极简版后续HTML结构保持，仅翻译文本内容。由于字符限制，此处仅展示部分翻译示例。完整翻译需按此模式处理所有段落。 ... </body></html>

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core concept of 'Invisible Finance' as described in the article, and how do stablecoins contribute to it?

AThe article describes 'Invisible Finance' as a future where financial capabilities, like internet bandwidth, become a fundamental resource that can be natively called by software and AI, automatically scheduled in the background. Stablecoins evolve from investment products into infrastructure supporting the digital economy. They enable this by becoming a foundational layer for asset issuance and on-chain settlement, allowing financial functions to be integrated seamlessly into any application, moving beyond a single super-app model.

QWhat significant step did Visa take regarding USDC, and why is it considered a key node for stablecoins entering the banking settlement layer?

AVisa began allowing certain US banks to use Circle's USDC directly on the VisaNet to fulfill settlement obligations, with the initial rollout on the Solana network. This is a key node because it integrates stablecoins into the core settlement process itself, moving beyond just being a front-end payment tool. It enables 24/7 settlement, reduces funds in transit time, improves liquidity predictability, and compresses the need for redundant capital reserves, fundamentally changing bank behavior towards liquidity management.

QAccording to the market overview, what are the top three blockchain networks by stablecoin market value, and which stablecoins showed the highest weekly growth?

AThe top three blockchain networks by stablecoin market value are: 1. Ethereum with $166.19 billion, 2. Tron with $80.993 billion, and 3. Solana with $16.048 billion. The stablecoins with the highest weekly growth were: 1. USDD (USDD) at +20.29%, 2. Resolv USD (USR) at +16.97%, and 3. First Digital USD (FDUSD) at +16.35%.

QWhat major regulatory shift is occurring in the US regarding crypto companies and banking, as indicated by the OCC's actions?

AThe US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval for federal trust bank charter applications to several crypto companies including Ripple, Circle, and BitGo. These charters allow the companies to hold customer assets but not accept deposits or make loans. This regulatory shift marks the deep integration of stablecoins, custody, and traditional financial regulation, paving the way for institutional capital entry and providing a clear path for compliant stablecoin expansion within the US banking system.

QHow does JPMorgan's analysis contrast with optimistic projections for stablecoin growth, and what factors does it cite for a more conservative outlook?

AJPMorgan projects the total stablecoin market capitalization to reach only $500-600 billion by 2028, which is far below the often-cited trillion-dollar expectations. The analysis argues that current stablecoin demand is still primarily driven by crypto trading, derivatives, and DeFi, rather than real-world payment scenarios. It also cites competition from bank-issued tokenized deposits, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and potential SWIFT on-chain solutions as factors that will divert demand away from private stablecoins, leading to a future of coexistence and division of labor rather than independent explosive growth for stablecoins alone.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 33m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 33m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 41m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 41m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 45m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 45m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 53m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 53m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 1h

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow