Federal Reserve quietly reverses anti-crypto stance with new policy

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-12-17Última atualização em 2025-12-17

Resumo

The Federal Reserve has reversed its restrictive 2023 policy on "novel activities" and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation. Announced on 17 December, the move adopts a "same activity, same risks, same regulation" philosophy, allowing banks to pursue crypto-related services like custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integration if they demonstrate strong risk management. The policy shift enables both insured and uninsured state member banks to apply for innovative activities, benefiting crypto-focused institutions. This marks a significant regulatory pivot from discouraging crypto engagement to encouraging responsible innovation under supervision, aligning with broader U.S. efforts to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance.

The Federal Reserve has withdrawn its restrictive 2023 policy on “novel activities” and replaced it with a new framework.

The new policy creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation, marking one of the most significant regulatory pivots in years.

The move, announced on 17 December, reverses the Fed’s prior stance, which had limited state member banks to only those activities explicitly allowed for national banks.

The 2023 policy had served as a de facto barrier to crypto-related services, especially custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integrations. Its withdrawal signals a shift toward enabling responsible digital-asset activity within the U.S. banking system.

Fed removes 2023 restrictions and adopts innovation-friendly standard

Under the new policy statement, the Federal Reserve adopts a “same activity, same risks, same regulation” philosophy — a framework that allows banks to pursue new technologies as long as they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman described the new guidance as an effort to modernize the banking sector while maintaining safety and soundness.

“New technologies offer efficiencies to banks and improved products and services to bank customers,” Bowman said.

“By creating a pathway for responsible, innovative products and services, the Board is helping ensure that the banking sector remains safe and sound while also modern, efficient, and effective.”

The withdrawal of the 2023 guidance also removes the supplementary crypto-specific interpretations that strongly discouraged engagement with digital assets.

That change alone opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

Clearer path for both insured and uninsured banks — including crypto-focused institutions

One of the most notable changes is that both insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks.

This has major implications for Wyoming SPDI-style institutions and trust banks focusing on digital assets.

The Fed states that uninsured banks may engage in a broader range of activities if they demonstrate adequate liquidity, loss-absorbing capacity, and credible resolution mechanisms.

The move follows the recent pilot program by the CFTC, and the OCC’s approval of trust charters for some crypto companies.

What this means for crypto adoption

This policy update does not give banks carte blanche to launch crypto products — but it finally replaces a restrictive framework with a risk-based approval system that encourages experimentation.

Banks seeking to custody crypto, settle tokenized assets, integrate stablecoins, or deploy blockchain rails now have:

  • A formal application path
  • Clarity on supervisory expectations
  • A regulatory environment that no longer assumes such activities are inherently unsafe

It’s a structural shift in tone — from “don’t engage with crypto” to “engage responsibly under supervision.”


Final Thoughts

  • The Federal Reserve’s withdrawal of its 2023 policy marks its clearest pro-innovation stance in years, opening the door for bank-led crypto adoption.
  • With the CFTC and OCC already advancing digital-asset frameworks, U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy that integrates blockchain into mainstream finance.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat did the Federal Reserve do with its 2023 policy on 'novel activities'?

AThe Federal Reserve withdrew its restrictive 2023 policy and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation.

QWhat is the core regulatory philosophy adopted in the new Federal Reserve policy?

AThe new policy adopts a 'same activity, same risks, same regulation' philosophy, allowing banks to pursue new technologies if they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

QAccording to the article, what specific crypto-related services are now more accessible to banks under the new policy?

AThe new framework opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

QHow does the new policy affect both insured and uninsured state member banks?

ABoth insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks, provided they demonstrate adequate risk management.

QWhat broader regulatory trend does this Federal Reserve move represent alongside actions from the CFTC and OCC?

AThis move indicates that U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance, following the CFTC's pilot program and the OCC's approval of trust charters for crypto companies.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 5h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片