February 3 Market Summary: U.S. Stocks and Gold Rebound Together, Fed Still Mired in Independence Crisis

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-03Última atualização em 2026-02-03

Resumo

Market Summary, February 3: U.S. stocks and gold both rebounded, while the Federal Reserve faces an ongoing independence crisis. Spot gold surged 3.56% to close at $4,826/oz, marking a strong recovery after its sharpest single-day drop since 1980 the previous Friday. The sell-off was triggered by Donald Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh—a known hawk—as the next Fed Chair, raising fears of prolonged high interest rates. However, markets are reassessing: Warsh’s potential appointment is not immediate, and the long-term "de-dollarization" narrative for gold remains intact. Technical factors, including margin hikes and stop-loss triggers, exacerbated the initial drop but also cleared excess leverage. Major banks like JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank maintain bullish long-term targets. Bitcoin struggled around $78,700, up 2% on the day but down over 10% for the week. It faced pressure from broader risk-off sentiment, liquidations of long positions exceeding $500 million, and a lack of new catalysts. Ethereum fell even more sharply, down 19% weekly. Altcoins broadly declined as capital concentrated in Bitcoin and a few high-quality assets. U.S. stocks rose, with the Dow up 1.05%, the S&P 500 up 0.54%, and the Nasdaq up 0.56%. The rebound was driven by stronger-than-expected manufacturing PMI data, gains in AI-related and transportation stocks, and a general recovery from Friday’s panic. However, underlying weaknesses persisted, as seen in Disney’s 7% drop on poor earnings. The core ...

Written by: Mamengniu, Deep Tide TechFlow

Gold: From "Epic Crash" to "Epic Rebound"

Spot gold closed at $4,826 per ounce today, surging 3.56% in a single day.

This is a textbook "V-shaped reversal." Last Friday, gold experienced its most brutal single-day plunge since 1980, plummeting from a historical high of $5,600 to around $4,400, a drop of over 10%. Silver fared even worse, plunging 28% in a single day, marking its largest decline in over 40 years.

The trigger for the crash was, of course, Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair.

Who is Warsh? A former Federal Reserve Governor, a typical hawk who advocates for tightening monetary policy. The market's logic chain was: Warsh takes office → interest rates remain high or even increase → the dollar strengthens → gold loses its appeal.

But what does today's rebound indicate? The market is repricing.

Investors realized two things:

  1. Warsh's nomination does not mean immediate tightening. He won't take office until May at the earliest; panic selling now might be excessive.
  2. Gold's "de-dollarization narrative" remains unchanged. Central banks have been frantically hoarding gold over the past three years, not because of Fed easing, but due to long-term distrust in the dollar credit system. Trump's interference with Fed independence has instead intensified this concern.

From a technical perspective, last Friday's plunge triggered massive stop-losses and margin calls (CME raised gold futures margins from 6% to 8%, and silver from 11% to 15%). This mechanical selling exacerbated the decline but also cleared out leveraged泡沫, creating conditions for a rebound.

Today's rebound is essentially a "overreaction repair." Gold's long-term logic still holds: geopolitical uncertainty, long-term dollar depreciation pressure, and global de-dollarization trends. JPMorgan reiterated today: gold target price of $6,300 by the end of 2026. Deutsche Bank also maintains a $6,000 target.

In the short term, gold may oscillate in the $4,500-$5,000 range, awaiting clear signals from the Fed meeting at the end of February.

Bitcoin: Struggling in the $78,000 "Quagmire"

Bitcoin is currently priced at $78,700, up 2% in 24 hours, but down over 10% for the week.

Bitcoin fell below $75,000 over the weekend, hitting a near two-month low. Although it rebounded slightly today, it is still overall in a "bleeding state."

Why the decline?

  1. Deteriorating macro environment. The collapse in risk sentiment triggered by gold's暴跌 spilled over to all risk assets. Although often called "digital gold," Bitcoin behaves more like a high-beta tech stock in times of panic.
  2. Leverage liquidations. In the thin weekend liquidity, over $500 million in long positions were liquidated. Low market depth means that even small selling pressure can break through key support levels, triggering cascading liquidations.
  3. Lack of new catalysts. Trump's promised "strategic Bitcoin reserves" have yet to see substantial progress. The market is watching: is this real action or pre-election promises?

Ethereum is weaker, currently at $2,340, down 19% for the week. The ETH/BTC ratio fell to 0.030, a multi-year low. The困境 of the Ethereum ecosystem has not improved; unless a killer app emerges, its weakness relative to Bitcoin will be difficult to reverse.

Altcoins are wailing across the board. Except for a few projects with real revenue (like Hyperliquid), most altcoins are in "survival mode." The market's "wealth gap" is extreme: funds are only paying for Bitcoin and a very few quality assets.

Bitcoin's short-term support is at $75,000; if broken, the next stop is $70,000. Resistance above is in the $82,000-$85,000 range.

U.S. Stocks: Rebounding from Panic, but the Dance on the Tightrope Has Just Begun

February 3 (Monday) U.S. three major indices all closed higher

  • Dow: 49,407 points (+1.05%, +515 points)
  • S&P 500: 6,976 points (+0.54%)
  • Nasdaq: 23,592 points (+0.56%)

This is a typical "panic repair rebound." Last Friday, gold's 11% crash and silver's 28% plunge triggered panic selling; today, the market rebounded strongly after confirming "the world is not ending."

Three supporting forces:

Manufacturing data unexpectedly strengthened. The U.S. January ISM Manufacturing PMI rose to 52.6, far exceeding expectations of 48.3, returning to expansion territory for the first time in a year. This gave the market confidence that "the economy is not that fragile."

AI infrastructure stocks led gains. Apple rose 4.1%, Micron Technology rose 5.5%, SanDisk surged 15.4%. The strength in memory chip stocks reflects continued optimism about AI infrastructure demand. Although Nvidia fell 2.9% on news of the "shelving of a planned $100 billion investment in OpenAI," the overall AI narrative is not broken.

Transportation stocks hit record highs. The Dow Jones Transportation Average rose about 2%, United Airlines and Delta Air Lines rose 4-5%, FedEx hit an all-time high since its 1978 IPO. Strength in transportation stocks is usually a leading indicator of accelerating economic activity.

But the cracks within the market are clearly visible:

Disney plummeted 7%, its report showed profit decline and rising costs. The impact of slowing consumption on the entertainment industry is beginning to show.

Strategy fell 6.7%, reflecting the continued weakness in cryptocurrencies.

More critically, the non-farm payrolls report originally scheduled for February 6 was postponed. This rare situation means the market will "fly blind" for longer—lacking key data, the uncertainty about whether the Fed will cut rates in March (current probability about 40-50%) increases.

The Core Market Contradiction: The Fed's Independence Crisis

The recent剧烈 volatility in all assets stems from the same question: Can the Fed remain independent?

Trump's nomination of Warsh as Fed Chair is itself a strong political signal. Warsh is an old friend of Trump's and is seen as more likely to follow White House orders. This breaks the Fed's traditional image of "political neutrality."

The market is worried about two extreme scenarios:

  1. Scenario A: Warsh is truly hawkish to the end. Rates remain high for a long time, the dollar strengthens, gold and Bitcoin continue to be under pressure, but U.S. stocks fall as corporate profits are eroded by high rates. This is a "lose-lose" situation.
  2. Scenario B: Warsh becomes "Trump's tool". Forced to cut rates under political pressure,配合 fiscal expansion. Short-term risk asset狂欢, but long-term dollar credit collapse, inflation失控. This is "slow poison."

In either scenario, the Fed's credibility will be damaged. This is the real reason for market panic.

Gold's rebound today is essentially betting on "Scenario B."

Weakened Fed independence, long-term decline in dollar credit, enhances gold's value as the "ultimate currency."

Bitcoin's continued weakness is because it is "unappealing either way" in this narrative: if the Fed is truly hawkish, tightening liquidity is unfavorable for risk assets; if the Fed becomes a political tool, Bitcoin's "decentralization" narrative seems ironic—if even the Fed can't maintain independence, what's the talk about对抗 "fiat currency hegemony"?

Key Events This Week: Data Determines Direction

February 4 (Tuesday): U.S. ADP Employment Data, ISM Services PMI

February 5 (Wednesday): U.S. Initial Jobless Claims

February 6 (Thursday): Non-Farm Payrolls Report, University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

The Non-Farm Payrolls report is the most important data this week.

If the data is strong (new jobs 250k+), the market will interpret it as "no reason for the Fed to cut rates," the dollar strengthens, gold and Bitcoin face short-term pressure.

If the data is weak (new jobs below 150k), the market will bet on "the Fed being forced to cut rates," risk assets rebound, gold continues to rise.

Current market consensus: No rate cut in February, possibility for March rises to around 40%.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason for the sharp rebound in gold prices on February 3rd?

AThe rebound was a 'textbook V-shaped reversal' driven by market repricing. Investors realized that the panic selling after Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair was overdone, as he wouldn't take office until May at the earliest. Additionally, the long-term 'de-dollarization narrative' for gold remained intact, with central banks continuing to hoard gold due to long-term distrust in the US credit system.

QHow did Bitcoin perform compared to gold, and what were the key reasons for its weakness?

ABitcoin struggled, trading around $78,700 with a modest 2% daily gain but a weekly loss of over 10%. Its weakness was attributed to a deteriorating macro environment (spillover from gold's crash), massive leverage liquidations (over $500 million in long positions were liquidated), and a lack of new catalysts, such as concrete progress on Trump's promised 'strategic Bitcoin reserve'.

QWhat were the three main factors that supported the rebound in US stock markets on February 3rd?

AThe three main supporting factors were: 1. Stronger-than-expected manufacturing data (ISM Manufacturing PMI rose to 52.6, entering expansion territory for the first time in a year). 2. Leadership from AI infrastructure stocks (e.g., Apple, Micron, SanDisk). 3. A surge in transportation sector stocks, with the Dow Jones Transportation Average hitting a record high, signaling potential economic acceleration.

QWhat is the core market contradiction identified in the article, and what are the two extreme scenarios it presents?

AThe core contradiction is the crisis of the Federal Reserve's independence. The two extreme scenarios are: Scenario A: Warsh remains truly hawkish, keeping rates high long-term, strengthening the dollar, and pressuring gold and Bitcoin, while also hurting US stocks due to eroded corporate profits. Scenario B: Warsh becomes a 'tool of Trump,' cutting rates under political pressure to enable fiscal expansion, leading to a short-term risk asset rally but long-term collapse of dollar credibility and runaway inflation.

QWhy is the upcoming Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report so critical for market direction this week?

AThe NFP report is critical because it will heavily influence expectations for the Fed's next move on interest rates. Strong data (e.g., +250K jobs) would be interpreted as the Fed having no reason to cut rates, strengthening the dollar and pressuring gold and Bitcoin. Weak data (e.g., below +150K jobs) would increase bets that the Fed will be forced to cut rates, leading to a rebound in risk assets and further gains for gold. The current market consensus is no cut in February, with a ~40% chance of a cut in March.

Leituras Relacionadas

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbitHá 24m

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbitHá 24m

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手Há 40m

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手Há 40m

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbitHá 40m

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbitHá 40m

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片