Ethena jumps 11.35% – As THIS turns positive, will ENA see a stronger breakout?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-04-10Última atualização em 2026-04-10

Resumo

ENA surged 11.35% to $0.09702, rebounding from below $0.09 and signaling early recovery strength, though it remains within a broader weak structure. The price faces key resistance at $0.10, a historical supply zone where upward momentum has slowed. Technical indicators like the MACD turning positive and Parabolic SAR flipping bullish suggest improving short-term sentiment. Persistent outflows reduced sell-side pressure, but limited inflows indicate weak demand. The funding rate turned slightly positive, reflecting growing long positioning without overcrowding. Overall, ENA shows signs of recovery but lacks strong confirmation for a sustained breakout above $0.10.

ENA surged 11.35% in 24 hours to $0.09702, rebounding sharply from recent lows and signaling early recovery strength. Price pushed higher after holding sub-$0.09 demand, which had previously acted as a consistent reaction zone.

This rebound reflected renewed buyer interest following a prolonged decline phase. However, the move has developed within a broader weak structure, which still lacks strong continuation signals.

The ENA rally has started to rebuild short-term strength, yet it has not fully shifted the larger trend.

Can ENA clear the $0.10 barrier?

ENA rebounded cleanly from below $0.09 and moved toward the $0.10 psychological resistance. This level has historically acted as a supply zone, where sellers have consistently stepped in.

As price approached this region, upward progress began to slow, which indicated hesitation among buyers. The structure showed a developing recovery leg, yet it lacked strong breakout confirmation above resistance.

Buyers managed to stabilize the price above recent lows, which supported the short-term trend. However, failure to decisively break above $0.10 kept the structure in a recovery phase rather than a confirmed reversal.

The current positioning suggested that further upside depended on sustained demand strength at these levels.

The MACD line had crossed above the signal line, while the histogram turned positive, signaling improving directional strength. This crossover emerged after an extended bearish phase, which reinforced the idea of a developing reversal.

In addition, the Parabolic SAR flipped below price, confirming a transition toward short-term bullish control. This shift suggested that downward pressure had weakened as buyers regained influence.

Source: TradingView

Outflows dominate as sell pressure eases

Spot flow data continued to reflect persistent outflows, with netflows recorded at -$384.87K. This consistent negative trend indicated that tokens had been leaving exchanges over time.

Such behavior reduced the available supply for immediate selling, which helped ease sell-side pressure.

As a result, the recent price rebound aligned with this reduction in exchange-held liquidity.

However, inflow activity remained limited, which suggested that strong demand had not yet fully returned. The structure pointed toward a supply-driven move, where reduced selling supported price rather than aggressive accumulation.

Source: CoinGlass

Are longs stepping in as funding flips positive?

Ethena’s OI-Weighted Funding Rate shifted into positive territory, reaching approximately 0.0095%. This change indicated that long traders had started paying to maintain positions, reflecting a growing bullish bias in derivatives markets.

The shift aligned with the recent price increase, which suggested that leverage had begun to support the upward move. However, the Funding Rate remained moderate, which showed that positioning had not yet become overcrowded.

This balance reduced the risk of sharp liquidation-driven reversals in the short term.

The gradual increase in long positioning suggested improving sentiment, although it still lacked the intensity typically seen during strong trend expansions.

Source: CoinGlass

Final Summary

  • ENA has rebounded strongly, but the price still struggled below the key $0.10 resistance level.
  • Outflows reduced selling pressure, while funding turns positive, showing an early bullish positioning shift.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the 24-hour price increase for ENA and what price level did it reach?

AENA surged 11.35% in 24 hours to reach a price of $0.09702.

QWhat key psychological resistance level is ENA currently struggling to break above?

AENA is struggling to break above the key psychological resistance level of $0.10.

QWhat two technical indicators signaled a shift towards a bullish trend for ENA?

AThe MACD line crossed above the signal line with a positive histogram, and the Parabolic SAR flipped below the price, both signaling a shift towards a bullish trend.

QAccording to the spot flow data, what was the trend and how did it affect selling pressure?

ASpot flow data showed persistent outflows of -$384.87K, meaning tokens were leaving exchanges. This reduced the available supply for selling, which helped ease sell-side pressure.

QWhat does a positive OI-Weighted Funding Rate of 0.0095% indicate for the Ethena market?

AA positive OI-Weighted Funding Rate indicates that long traders are paying to maintain their positions, reflecting a growing bullish bias and leverage starting to support the upward price move in the derivatives market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHá 17m

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHá 17m

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHá 18m

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHá 18m

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHá 28m

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHá 28m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

Blockchain Finds Its True Path After 18 Years: Becoming the Financial Backbone for AI Agents and Autonomy This analysis explores a pivotal shift in the blockchain and crypto investment landscape, driven by the dominance of AI. Major venture capital firms, including Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs, are moving beyond pure "crypto" investment theses. They are expanding their focus to AI, robotics, and frontier tech, signaling that blockchain is no longer seen as a standalone sector but as an underlying infrastructure layer. The core argument is that blockchain's killer application may not be user-facing apps, but rather providing the economic rails for the coming wave of AI agents, autonomous robots, and automated systems. Key capabilities like self-custody wallets, programmable stablecoins for micropayments, on-chain identity, and verifiable smart contracts are positioned as essential for a future where machines conduct economic activity. The recent $1.4 billion investment by Tether (via its venture arm) in German robotics company NEURA Robotics exemplifies this, aiming to embed Tether's wallet tools directly into robots for autonomous transactions. While many "AI + Crypto" projects remain superficial, the article concludes that true value lies where crypto is a necessary component—enabling machine-to-machine payments, agent autonomy, verifiable data provenance, and open financial settlement for the AI era. For crypto venture capital, this convergence with AI represents both an adaptation to shifting capital flows and a potential path to unlocking the large-scale, non-speculative utility the industry has long sought.

marsbitHá 48m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

marsbitHá 48m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片