Encrypted Workplace Survey: Low Salaries Widespread and Layoffs Without Compensation, How Should Practitioners Respond?

比推Publicado em 2025-12-26Última atualização em 2025-12-26

Resumo

Based on a survey of 506 professionals, the crypto industry's workplace reality is revealed to be starkly different from its "get-rich-quick" myth. Key findings show over 70% of respondents earn a monthly salary below $4,000, with compensation and benefits lagging behind traditional tech sectors. Nearly half have experienced layoffs, and 40% of those received no severance pay. Furthermore, 70% reported never receiving token-based incentives, and a quarter are in a "pay-to-work" situation, having lost money overall in the sector. Despite these challenges, factors like remote work flexibility (available to 70%), manageable working hours, and the freedom to take on side jobs contribute to a moderate job satisfaction score of 3.51/5. Over 80% of respondents plan to remain in the industry, driven by the long-term goal of accumulating $1-5 million for retirement, though most are pessimistic about the 2026 job market outlook.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: 2025 Crypto Industry Workplace Survey: 70% Earn Less Than $4,000 Monthly, N+1 Severance Becomes a Distant Hope


While Xiaohongshu still glorifies the "get-rich-quick myths" and "six-figure salaries" of Web3, what is the true state of the crypto industry?

Through 506 survey questionnaires, we engaged in a candid conversation with practitioners, and the results were surprising, even harsh: there is no gold rush here. Over 70% of people earn less than $4,000 per month, which is generally lower than in developed regions like Europe and the United States. Even a quarter of respondents are in a "pay-to-work" loss-making state; there is also no comprehensive protection, with nearly half having experienced layoffs, and most not receiving N+1 compensation.

Yet, despite this, over 80% choose to stay. Is it because of the 70% remote work freedom? Or is it because of the shared dream of "retiring with $5 million"?

In this report, we attempt to use cold, hard data to reveal the most genuine anxieties, desires, and survival strategies of Web3 workers.

This content is the questionnaire results section of the "Web3 Recruitment and Job Hunting 2025 Year-End Review: Who's Making Money, Who's Paying to Work?" Full report available at:

https://www.techflowpost.com/article/detail_29702.html

Regarding age distribution, the main workforce aged 18-29 is indeed the majority, but middle-aged practitioners (>30 years old) are also quite numerous. This might be related to the less severe "age 35 ceiling" in the Web3 industry. Compared to internet companies, Web3 companies value experience, ability, and efficiency more, with many hoping that seasoned professionals can quickly build products "plug-and-play".

The distribution of educational background is largely consistent with the earlier talent data statistics, predominantly undergraduate degrees, with some having less than a bachelor's and others holding master's or doctoral degrees, though the proportion of postgraduates is not high.

In terms of professional roles, the largest group is in market-related roles (operations/BD/customer service, etc.), followed by developers (front-end/back-end/smart contracts/blockchain, etc.). Then come product, human resources, investment research, design, trading, etc. Among the "other" submissions, common roles included risk control & security, KOLs, etc.

Regarding employment/attrition status, only 52% of respondents are currently employed in Web3. Over 30% are in a more flexible life situation. This indicates, on one hand, that market conditions affecting company headcount have impacted many; on the other hand, it might be because certain unique Web3 business models have made some people less reliant on traditional employment for cash flow, such as KOLs and traders.

Over half of the submissions indicated having worked at exchanges, followed by studios/communities, DeFi, media, wallets, and other common business types. Both talent and job providers are heavily concentrated in exchanges due to the Matthew Effect. This also reflects, to some extent, the current industry dilemma: apart from exchanges, the revenue-generating capabilities of other business models mostly decrease from C-end — tools — underlying layers.

Regarding remote collaboration tools, as this survey took place in a Chinese-language vertical Web3 recruitment community, Telegram is favored by most companies for its confidentiality and usability, followed by mainstream Chinese tools like Feishu and WeChat, and finally tools commonly used by foreign companies like Google Suite, Discord, Slack, etc.

In terms of income levels, contrary to the external myths of immense wealth, most Web3 workers' incomes are not only lower than those in many top internet companies but also severely lacking in long-term incentives (tokens/equity), year-end bonuses, and layoff compensation.

Over 70% of people have a monthly salary income of less than $4,000 (approximately RMB 28,000), and the frequently mentioned monthly salary of $10,000 on Xiaohongshu is a rarity.

Close to half of the people have experienced layoffs, and 40% of those laid off reported no compensation, while 21% said that even if there was compensation, it fell far short of legal standards (e.g., n+1).

Nearly half reported not having received a year-end bonus; even among those who did, it was generally 1-3 months' salary, on par with most internet companies outside the Web3 industry.

Regarding the well-known "upward channel" of token equity incentives, nearly 70% of practitioners reported not having received any. Even among those who did, very few received more than 20% of their salary's value.

Even a quarter of people have accumulated an overall wealth "loss" since entering the crypto space, in a "pay-to-work" state; other respondents mostly accumulated wealth around $100K (approximately RMB 700,000).

However, on the flip side of this seemingly hopeless income level, Web3's strong remote work culture offers some relief. Nearly 70% of respondents indicated their companies support remote work, and another 15% reported support for hybrid work, meaning虽然有办公室 but attendance is not mandatory, or working from home is allowed a few days a week.

Remote work does alleviate some of the pain of being a worker. In the "biggest source of stress" question, 31 respondents selected "excessively long commute." Other top sources of stress included product growth, work boundaries, market volatility, fear of being laid off, and having a foolish boss.

To maintain employees' mental health as social beings, many companies have taken measures to sustain team cohesion.

Under the combined effect of low income and instability, many choose to hold multiple jobs. 20% of respondents indicated having side jobs. This also reflects the tech-oriented culture of most Web3 companies: as long as problems are solved and competence is demonstrated, they don't interfere with employees' lifestyles and income methods.

Regarding overtime intensity, 80% of people work approximately 40-50 hours per week. Thus, Web3 overtime seems less intense than many 996/007 sweatshops in web2.

Regarding job hopping, over half want to change companies, with 30% planning to do so within 3-6 months. But about a quarter are satisfied with their current situation, and 8 respondents even found "companies they hope to work for for a lifetime".

Considering factors like minimal overtime, remote work options, and side jobs allowed, many rate their current job positively. In the rating section for their current job, the average score was 3.51.

Regarding whether their next job will still be in the crypto space, over 80% choose to stay, while 7% choose to leave.

In the reasons for leaving section, the choices reflect the industry's most genuine, cold inner reality.

But all this preparation is for early retirement. For "how much wealth would make you consider resigning", the vast majority chose $1M – $5M (approximately RMB 7 million ~ 35 million). This might indeed be the wealth limit one can achieve through salaried work. But 20% chose "no limit", reflecting confidence in their abilities.

Regarding optimism about the 2026 job market, only 28% believe it will improve, with most being pessimistic or taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Truth Session

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598504

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of crypto industry workers earn less than $4000 per month according to the survey?

AOver 70% of crypto industry workers earn less than $4000 per month.

QHow many respondents reported experiencing layoffs in the crypto industry, and what portion received no compensation?

ANearly half of the respondents experienced layoffs, and 40% of those laid off received no compensation.

QWhat is the primary reason most workers choose to stay in the crypto industry despite low pay and instability?

AOver 80% of workers choose to stay, largely due to factors like remote work flexibility (70% support remote work) and the dream of achieving financial freedom (e.g., retiring with $1-5 million).

QWhich type of company employs the most people in the crypto industry based on the survey?

AExchanges employ the most people, with over half of the respondents having worked at an exchange.

QWhat percentage of crypto workers have not received any token-based incentives (币权激励)?

ANearly 70% of crypto industry workers have not received any token-based incentives.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight NewsHá 23m

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight NewsHá 23m

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbitHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片