Eight Global Central Banks Enter the Fray, Aiming to Claim a Piece of the Stablecoin Pie?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-02Última atualização em 2026-06-02

Resumo

The article discusses the Agorá project, a global cross-border payment system initiative led by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) with participation from eight major central banks (including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan) and over 40 private financial institutions like JPMorgan and SWIFT. Agorá aims to create a unified platform for the instant settlement of cross-border transactions using tokenized commercial bank deposits. A key feature is its strict "permissioned" design, where funds are pre-labeled by country and smart contracts enforce AML and sanctions checks. This contrasts with the "permissionless" ideal suggested by its ancient Greek namesake. The system employs a two-tier architecture: central banks retain full control over sovereign reserves on separate ledgers, while private entities manage a shared ledger for multi-currency clearing. The project, which completed a prototype in May 2026, seeks to streamline the slow, multi-step process of traditional cross-border payments. It is positioned as a centralized, regulatory-compliant alternative to decentralized stablecoins like Tether, targeting large-scale institutional transfers. The analysis highlights a potential future market split: projects like Agorá could dominate wholesale institutional payments, while public blockchain-based stablecoins retain their role in retail, remittance, and emerging market use cases. This represents an effort by traditional financ...

Author: Thejaswini M A

Compilation: Chopper, Foresight News

Thousands of years ago, the ancient Greek Agorá was the public marketplace in Athens, a place where anyone could come and trade freely, with no entry barriers, not bound by any local jurisdiction. The concept of "permissionlessness" lies at the very heart of this word.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) named its project Agorá, a choice laden with meaning. However, the actual design of the Agorá project, spearheaded by the BIS and implemented jointly by seven central banks and over forty private institutions, stands in stark contrast to the word's original association with a "free market."

In this system, funds are tagged with their country of origin before they are transferred; smart contracts perform anti-money laundering screening and sanctions list verification at the token layer; each central bank retains full control over its own reserves, and cross-border fund flows must pass through a compliance validation layer embedded within the token.

In short, this is a programmable fiat currency system where permission must be granted beforehand for everything.

The seven central banks participating in the Agorá project are: the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, and the Banque de France representing the Eurozone; the Bank of Canada joined the ranks just four days ago. Financial giants such as JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Mastercard, Visa, and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), along with more than forty other institutions, are jointly involved in the development.

A project mobilizing such a massive institutional force prompted me to delve deeper into dissecting this system.

The project employs a two-tier separated architecture: one tier is fully controlled by the respective central banks, managing the underlying base currency reserves; the other tier is operated by commercial banks, handling daily transactions for end-users. Tokenized commercial bank deposits are consolidated onto a shared platform, processed collaboratively by multiple private institutions for multi-currency clearing; meanwhile, each central bank's reserves are stored independently on its own sovereign ledger, with sovereignty firmly retained by each respective central bank.

The BIS aims to build a state-controlled, closed-loop payment system by integrating commercial bank ledgers and anchoring sovereign reserves. Institutions are accelerating the implementation of a compliant framework, intending to establish it before decentralized stablecoins like Tether completely sever global commerce from the traditional banking system.

Current cross-border payments are akin to a relay race: message transmission, manual compliance checks, and ledger clearing belong to different institutional systems, often taking days. The Agorá project compresses this lengthy multi-step collaboration into a single on-chain, real-time operation. This prototype concluded on May 27, 2026, with the Bank of Canada promptly announcing its participation.

Organizers emphasize that the current phase remains infrastructure testing, with no formal timeline for commercial deployment, but the next stage will involve pilot tests with real funds.

Unlike previous central bank initiatives that only released research papers, seven major currency authorities spent two years developing and testing this real-time cross-border clearing system. The underlying code is functional. The existing challenge is no longer technical but rather how multiple governments will implement regulation and delineate responsibilities for the shared network, facing immense administrative coordination hurdles.

Meanwhile, the established cross-border messaging giant SWIFT is concurrently advancing its own underlying transformation, positioning its layout precisely within the commercial banking layer. On March 30, 2026, SWIFT finalized the design for its blockchain-based shared ledger, entering Minimum Viable Product (MVP) development, with plans to launch real-time transactions within the year. The ledger is built on Hyperledger Besu, which is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), with final fund clearing still performed off-chain using traditional Real-Time Gross Settlement systems.

However, SWIFT and Agorá are not in competition: the SWIFT ledger focuses on reconciling tokenized deposits between commercial banks, while Agorá handles the final large-value clearing of central bank reserves. The BIS ensured interoperability standards between the two systems from the outset, methodically transforming the traditional cross-border clearing system into a programmable digital network in two steps.

A closer look at the participant list reveals significant overlap: Deutsche Bank, a core Agorá member, also formed an alliance with Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Barclays, Santander, and nine other banks to explore issuing 1:1 reserve-backed tokens on public blockchains; UBS and Citigroup are similarly involved in both; JPMorgan Chase participates in Agorá, operates its own JPM Coin, and recently piloted cross-border clearing on the Ripple ledger.

Such parallel investments are highly unusual in finance: the standard practice for institutions is to concentrate technical resources on one technological path. Top teams simultaneously developing two potentially competing frameworks on separate tracks reflects internal division within bank management. Giants holding vast data and enormous capital cannot predict which framework will ultimately prevail. The technological paths are clear, but policy directions remain uncertain.

Ripple, after a decade of effort, has consistently argued that "atomic settlement" (where a transaction either completes in full or fails entirely) is the optimal solution for cross-border payments. Now, the BIS's Agorá project has implemented this settlement logic, albeit replacing XRP as the bridging asset with central bank reserve tokens, directly undermining XRP's necessity as a cross-border bridge asset.

Nevertheless, the Ripple ledger continues to permeate traditional finance. On May 6, JPMorgan's Kinetyx, Mastercard, Ripple, and Ondo Finance completed the first cross-border redemption of tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds on Ripple, with the entire clearing process taking less than five seconds. The Ripple USD stablecoin RLUSD's market capitalization surpassed $1.4 billion; in January 2026, the total value of tokenized assets on Ripple exceeded $2 billion; Société Générale issued a Euro stablecoin on Ripple in February; and in December 2025, Ripple obtained a limited-purpose trust bank charter from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

While Ripple's architectural logic is validated, the assertion that "XRP is indispensable" has not materialized. Even so, Ripple's ongoing integration into institutional clearing systems holds far greater significance for long-term value than debates over whether Ripple or central bank reserve tokens are superior.

Setting aside commercial rhetoric, on the Ripple network, transaction fees are extremely low and permanently waived, not flowing to node operators. Increased institutional transaction volume does not generate revenue for validators or token holders like Ethereum's Gas fees; it only results in a slight burn of the existing XRP supply. When institutions like JPMorgan transfer tokenized assets on-chain, they utilize their own liquidity pools and do not rely on XRP circulating in the market for liquidity support; the network merely provides high-speed transfer and cryptographic security.

The core value of this model lies in ecosystem lock-in. Once financial institutions trust the network to custody fiat and stablecoin assets, the technology becomes embedded in global financial infrastructure, compelling the deployment of bank-grade node facilities, and the ledger becomes a permanent component of the global financial system. In the long run, deep technological integration with global banking is far more important than the price fluctuations of a single token.

All these variables ultimately converge on the stablecoin arena. Tether's daily trading volume consistently ranges between $40-50 billion, with the total stablecoin market exceeding $320 billion. While Agorá is still in the pilot stage with deployment seemingly distant, SpaceX already uses stablecoins to manage cross-border corporate funds, and Western Union has launched remittance services on the Solana public blockchain; market competition has already taken the lead.

Agorá targets large-scale, wholesale cross-border clearing for institutions. If successfully deployed, it could divert corporate cross-border funding needs currently served by stablecoins. However, this is just one segment of stablecoin applications: Brazil's Central Bank issued Resolution 561, prohibiting local financial institutions from using stablecoins for cross-border payments, yet it cannot stop Brazilian citizens from holding dollar stablecoins as a store of value; Turkish retail investors buy USDT to hedge against lira inflation—these fragmented needs fall outside Agorá's intended scope.

In the short term, stablecoins and Agorá are more complementary than competitive, with almost non-overlapping use cases: Agorá is a closed institutional network, accessible only to central banks or licensed banks authorized by them; ordinary people hoarding dollars for safety or small payment companies using public blockchains for remittances cannot access this system. The official closed-loop system cannot achieve the inclusive access speed of public blockchains, nor can public chain stablecoins achieve the final settlement authority required by central banks.

The medium-term landscape is more complex. Currently, corporate treasury teams choose USDC or USDT for cross-border settlements primarily due to the lengthy cycles and high fees of traditional correspondent banking. If Agorá is successfully deployed in the future with sufficient liquidity, some corporate funds may shift. Given comparable clearing efficiency, corporate treasurers would likely prioritize official channels that are sovereign-regulated and free from third-party counterparty risk.

However, unifying governance rules among seven sovereign central banks is a monumental global challenge, and many past cross-border projects have failed at this hurdle. Simultaneously, major corporations have already integrated USDC systems and established mature risk control processes; they will not overhaul existing operations simply because of a theoretically superior new system.

The market will likely evolve towards stratification: Agorá monopolizes large-value institutional cross-border channels, while public chain stablecoins retain the retail and fragmented business segments. This appears to be a market split, but in reality, the sovereign system completes the boundary-setting for public chains, confining decentralized networks to areas that cannot challenge the foundations of traditional intermediaries—remittances, individual savings, and small-value payments in emerging markets. These markets are sizable but not the core concentration points of global financial leverage.

This market stratification theory is about to face real-world testing: the EU's Pontes framework is set to connect various distributed ledgers with Europe's core clearing system, TARGET, by September 2026—just three months away. Once successfully integrated, European institutional tokenized payments will gain direct access to central banks, marking the formal beginning of direct competition between the official system and open public blockchains.

The ancient Athenian Agorá marketplace ultimately perished because people stopped going there to trade. That, ultimately, is the final metric by which all financial networks are judged.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the BIS Agorá project, and how does it differ from the concept of an 'open market'?

AThe BIS Agorá project is a real-time cross-border payment system developed by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in collaboration with eight major central banks (like the New York Fed, Bank of England, Bank of Japan) and over 40 private financial institutions. Despite being named after the ancient Greek 'Agorá' (a free, open market), the system is designed to be a 'permissioned' or controlled framework. It uses tokenized bank deposits and national central bank reserves on a shared platform but mandates regulatory checks (like anti-money laundering screening) at the token layer and maintains strict control of reserves with each sovereign central bank, contrasting with a fully open and permissionless system.

QWhat is the two-tier design of the Agorá project?

AThe Agorá project features a two-tier, separate design. The first tier is controlled by national central banks, which are solely responsible for managing the underlying base currency reserves. The second tier is operated by commercial banks, which handle the daily transactions of end-users. Tokenized commercial bank deposits are consolidated on a shared platform for multi-currency clearing by private institutions, while the national central bank reserves are kept independently on each country's own ledger, ensuring sovereign control is maintained.

QHow does the Agorá project aim to improve the current cross-border payment process?

AThe current cross-border payment process is often slow, involving multiple steps like message transmission, manual compliance checks, and ledger clearing across different systems, which can take days. The Agorá project compresses this lengthy multi-step collaboration into a single, instantaneous on-chain operation. It aims to create a real-time cross-border settlement system by using tokenized bank deposits and linking them to national central bank reserves on a shared ledger, significantly reducing transaction time.

QWhat potential impact could the Agorá project have on existing stablecoins like USDT and USDC in the medium term?

AIn the medium term, if the Agorá project is successfully implemented with sufficient liquidity, it could divert some large-scale corporate cross-border payment flows away from stablecoins like USDC and USDT. Businesses might prefer the sovereign-backed, regulated, and potentially lower-risk official channel offered by Agorá for wholesale settlements. However, it is unlikely to replace stablecoins entirely, as they serve different retail and decentralized finance (DeFi) use cases that Agorá does not target. The market is expected to become segmented, with Agorá handling large institutional transactions and stablecoins dominating retail, remittance, and emerging market payments.

QAccording to the article, what is the relationship between the Agorá project and Ripple's technology?

AThe article suggests that the BIS Agorá project has effectively implemented the 'atomic settlement' logic that Ripple has long advocated for as the optimal solution for cross-border payments. However, Agorá uses central bank reserve tokens instead of XRP as the settlement asset, which potentially undermines the necessity of XRP as a bridge currency. Despite this, Ripple's ledger continues to see adoption in traditional finance (e.g., for tokenized treasury settlements), and its long-term value lies in the deep integration of its technology into the global financial infrastructure, creating a network effect that binds institutions, rather than just the price performance of XRP itself.

Leituras Relacionadas

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHá 15m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHá 15m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 45m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 45m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 1h

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHá 1h

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片