ECB eyes onchain settlements next year as lawmakers weigh digital euro privacy

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-19Última atualização em 2025-12-19

Resumo

The European Central Bank (ECB) plans to enable blockchain-based settlement in central bank money by next year and is preparing to issue a digital euro, though its privacy features depend on approval from EU lawmakers. ECB executive Piero Cipollone stated that the digital euro would support both online and offline transactions, enhancing resilience and privacy. The offline version would allow device-to-device payments without third-party validation, similar to cash. The ECB aims to address fragmented retail payments and slow cross-border transactions with the digital euro, while also mitigating risks from stablecoins. However, the EU's recent push for increased surveillance and data retention contrasts with the ECB's privacy-focused design. Legislative approval is expected by 2026, with initial transactions possible in 2027 and full issuance by 2029.

The European Central Bank plans to allow blockchain-based settlement in central bank money next year and is preparing to issue a digital euro, but its privacy safeguards will ultimately depend on approval from EU lawmakers.

ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone said in a Friday statement that the institution will “make it possible to settle transactions based on [DLT] in central bank money” next year. He also said the ECB is “getting ready” to issue the digital euro and to link its system internationally for cross-border payments.

The digital euro underlying infrastructure would also be available to other institutions to settle transactions with other central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The executive said that holding limits and a lack of interest are expected to “preserve banks’ role in “credit intermediation and monetary transmission.”

Assuming legislative approval in 2026, initial transactions with the digital euro could follow in 2027, with readiness to issue the CBDC in 2029. In Thursday statements, ECB President Christine Lagarde said the ECB’s work is over and that the digital euro design, including its privacy features, lies with EU lawmakers. Cipollone shared the ECB vision:

“The digital euro would be available both online and offline, supporting resilience and privacy.“

According to Cipollone, a CBDC is needed due to the EU’s fragmented retail payment ecosystem, slow cross-border payments. He also explained that without a CBDC, tokenization and DLT would lead to fragmentation and increased credit risk. A tokenized digital euro will also be available for the digital asset market, presumably to prevent this fragmentation.

Cipollone acknowledged that stablecoins offer a solution to slow, costly cross-border payments, but also introduce risks to currencies and financial systems. Furthermore, “if dollar-based stablecoins were to expand, [...] they could erode the international role of the euro.”

Related: Cypherpunk values are dying, but they’re 'Not Dead Yet'

A private CBDC that works offline

The ECB’s 2023 opinion is that the digital euro should not be programmable in a way that restricts what it can be spent on, while still allowing for conditional payments. The ECB also noted that “for the offline model of the digital euro, the ECB welcomes that the envisaged level of privacy and data protection would be similar to cash.” The parallels to cash do not end here:

“The offline digital euro model would ensure that not all transactions are necessarily validated by a third party, thereby meeting the data protection requirements of proportionality and necessity.“

The offline variant of the digital euro would be stored locally, allowing device-to-device payments without requiring an online ledger check. The ECB discusses using the secure element in mobile devices to store offline digital euro and considers smart cards — reminiscent of cyberpunk credit chips.

Related: Crypto urges SEC to see the good in blockchain privacy tools

EU’s surveillance push

Those recommendations are in stark contrast to the recent attacks on privacy by the EU, whose legislators must approve the CBDC blueprint. Last month, the European Commission unsuccessfully attempted to mandate private message scanning yet again.

An internal Nov. 27 EU document published earlier this month by German-language news outlet Netzpolitik appears to show that member states view sweeping data retention positively. The document discusses companies logging “who communicated with whom, when, where and how,” mentioning “location data” 11 times.

The EU’s AML Handbook, published in May, bans “crypto-asset accounts allowing anonymisation of transactions,” and “accounts using anonymity-enhancing coins from 2027. This followed the EU Innovation Hub taking issue with crypto privacy-preserving technologies in June 2024.

Related: SEC commissioner says crypto is ‘helping to nudge reassessment’ on privacy

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the European Central Bank (ECB) planning to allow next year, and what is the timeline for the initial transactions and full issuance of the digital euro?

AThe ECB plans to allow blockchain-based settlement in central bank money next year. Assuming legislative approval in 2026, initial transactions with the digital euro could follow in 2027, with readiness to issue the CBDC in 2029.

QAccording to ECB executive Piero Cipollone, what are the key reasons a digital euro is needed for the EU?

ACipollone stated that a CBDC is needed due to the EU's fragmented retail payment ecosystem and slow cross-border payments. He also explained that without a CBDC, tokenization and DLT would lead to fragmentation and increased credit risk.

QHow does the ECB envision the privacy features of the offline digital euro, and how does it compare to cash?

AThe ECB stated that for the offline model, the level of privacy and data protection would be similar to cash. It would ensure that not all transactions are necessarily validated by a third party, meeting data protection requirements of proportionality and necessity. It would be stored locally, allowing device-to-device payments without an online ledger check.

QWhat potential risk does ECB executive Cipollone associate with the expansion of dollar-based stablecoins?

ACipollone acknowledged that if dollar-based stablecoins were to expand, they could erode the international role of the euro.

QHow do the ECB's recommendations for a private digital euro contrast with recent actions by the European Union?

AThe ECB's recommendations for a private CBDC that works offline are in stark contrast to recent EU attacks on privacy, such as attempts to mandate private message scanning and the AML Handbook's ban on anonymous crypto-asset accounts and anonymity-enhancing coins from 2027.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbitHá 8m

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbitHá 8m

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbitHá 1h

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbitHá 1h

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders In recent years, prediction markets have grown from a niche sector to a mainstream arena, attracting billions in trading volume and institutional capital. However, the user experience and tools for traders have not kept pace. Outpoll, a new global prediction market platform, aims to fill this gap by providing enhanced trading infrastructure for active and professional traders. Built on standard prediction market principles, Outpoll allows users to trade on the outcome of specific events. It uses fully collateralized contracts with USDC settlement, charges a competitive 0.1% fee per trade, and provides clear settlement rules upfront to minimize disputes. A key focus for Outpoll is its professional-grade trading tools. The platform supports limit and market orders, as well as take-profit and stop-loss orders for open positions—features uncommon in prediction markets. For automated trading, Outpoll offers comprehensive REST and WebSocket APIs, enabling portfolio management, price arbitrage, and integration with existing tools. The platform also features a creator-led market model, where approved experts and community leaders can create and manage markets for niche topics under platform supervision. Its integrated interface combines news feeds directly with trading functions, allowing users to monitor events and manage positions seamlessly. Outpoll launched with a native Android app (available on Google Play) and plans an iOS version later this year. In summary, Outpoll distinguishes itself with trader-focused tools, practical APIs, transparent and collateralized markets, integrated news, and an expanding creator program. For active traders, its advanced order types and API access alone make it a platform worth watching. Outpoll is now globally accessible via outpoll.com and Google Play.

marsbitHá 1h

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片