Double Long Hynix ETF Plummets, Halved and Halved Again

marsbitPublicado em 2026-07-29Última atualização em 2026-07-29

Resumo

On July 29th, shares of South Korean semiconductor firm SK Hynix plummeted over 19% intraday, marking its largest single-day drop on record. The Hong Kong-listed "CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) Product" (Stock Code: 07709) tumbled more than 28% intraday before closing 13.99% lower at HK$32.70. This leveraged product, designed to deliver twice the daily return of SK Hynix, has seen a catastrophic decline of over 80% from its June 25th high of HK$193.65, far exceeding the underlying stock's roughly 50% drop from its peak. Its assets under management have shrunk dramatically, falling over 70% from a high of HKD 130 billion in June to approximately HKD 31.9 billion. This steep sell-off occurred despite SK Hynix reporting stellar Q2 2026 earnings, with revenue and operating profit surging 257% and 557% year-over-year, respectively. However, the results fell short of market expectations. Analysts cited concerns about potential oversupply from expansion and noted that long-term supply agreements for its high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips might limit near-term price increases. In response to heightened volatility and regulatory changes, the product's issuer, CSOP Asset Management, announced a transition to a "flexible leverage mechanism" starting August 3rd. Under new Hong Kong SFC rules, the fund's daily leverage multiplier can now be dynamically adjusted between 1.1x and 2x (or -1.1x to -2x for inverse products) based on market conditions, moving away from a fixed 2x target. T...

On the 29th, shares of South Korean semiconductor company SK Hynix plummeted during trading hours, falling over 19%, setting a record for its largest single-day drop. In the Hong Kong market, the "CSOP 2x Long Hynix" product plunged more than 28% intraday, narrowing its decline to 13.99% by the close, ending at HK$32.70.

On July 27, CSOP Asset Management announced that its 2x leveraged and inverse products linked to individual stocks such as SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, NVIDIA, and Tesla will officially switch to a flexible leverage structure on August 3. Under extreme market conditions, the leverage ratio could be reduced to as low as 1.1x or -1.1x.

Over 80% Drop in One Month

Over the past month or so, SK Hynix's stock price has seen a significant correction. On June 25, the company's stock price in the Korean market hit a high of 2.987 million won per share; since then, it has been on a downward trend. By the close on July 29, SK Hynix was trading at 1.401 million won per share, having been "halved" from its peak.

The decline of the "CSOP 2x Long Hynix" product has been even more severe. From its peak of HK$193.65 on June 25, it fell to HK$32.70 at the close on July 29, a staggering drop of 83%.

Public information shows that the full name of "CSOP 2x Long Hynix" is CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) Product (HKEX code: 07709). It is issued and managed by CSOP Asset Management Limited ("CSOP") and was officially listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on October 16, 2025.

The fund's market price rose from HK$17.5 at the beginning of the year to a peak of HK$193.65, a surge of over 10 times. After nearly a month of adjustment, the "2x Long Hynix ETF" has retreated to its price level from the end of February this year.

According to media reports, CSOP's CEO Ding Chen stated at an event on July 16 that CSOP's globally first 2x leveraged product on SK Hynix, launched just 8 months ago, had reached a size of HK$130 billion by June this year, becoming the world's largest individual stock leveraged product by size.

Accompanying the drop in market price, the fund's asset size has also "shrunk." Latest data shows that on July 29, its asset size was only HK$31.9 billion, shrinking by nearly HK$100 billion in about a month, a decrease of over 70% from its peak.

Surge in Earnings, Plunge in Share Price

On July 29, SK Hynix released its Q2 2026 financial report. The data showed the company's revenue for the quarter reached 79.32 trillion won (approximately RMB 3.68838 trillion), a massive year-on-year increase of 257%, but falling short of market expectations of 84 trillion won. Operating profit was 60.54 trillion won (approximately RMB 2.81511 trillion), soaring 557% year-on-year, also below the expected 64 trillion won. Net profit was 93.92 trillion won (approximately RMB 4.36728 trillion), surging over 12 times year-on-year.

According to Yonhap News Agency, in the earnings conference call, SK Hynix addressed concerns about reduced investment in AI infrastructure, stating, "As AI competition among cloud service providers continues and services expand, we expect AI infrastructure investment to remain stable and sustained beyond next year."

Regarding price negotiations for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) next year, SK Hynix said, "Due to contractual relationships, specific prices and details are difficult to disclose," adding, "We are currently negotiating supply volumes and prices with major customers. Discussions are progressing smoothly based on solid customer demand."

The report cited Kim Seok-hwan, a researcher at Mirae Asset Securities, who said, "SK Hynix's revenue, operating profit, and operating profit margin for the last quarter all fell short of market expectations."

A Reuters report suggested the company downplayed market concerns that its capacity expansion might trigger oversupply, stating it would dynamically adjust its investment scale based on market demand.

SK Hynix stated, "Major tech companies continue to increase investment in AI infrastructure construction, driving new supply demand. The revenue generated by AI services will continue to support related capital expenditures, so the growth momentum for memory chip demand is expected to continue."

The report cited analysts saying that while long-term supply agreements allow companies to better predict future demand, they also restrain short-term product price increases, which is one of the reasons for the company's earnings miss this time.

Analysts added that SK Hynix has a higher proportion of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) business, and the price increase for such chips has not been as strong as for traditional memory chips.

To Dynamically Adjust Leverage Multiples

On July 24, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a revised version of the "Circular on Listed Structured Funds" (the "Circular"), which sets out requirements for listed structured funds, including leveraged and inverse products.

Among them, additional requirements were proposed for leveraged and inverse products. It mandates that leveraged and inverse products whose carrying scale fluctuates significantly with market conditions must adopt a flexible leverage mechanism, meaning the daily leverage multiple can be dynamically adjusted, but must not exceed the prescribed leverage cap (the conventional leverage range cap is 2x to -2x). After the close of each trading day, the issuer must announce the target leverage multiple for the next trading day on the product's official website and the HKEX website.

The "Circular" pointed out that leveraged and inverse products are short-term trading tools and are completely different from traditional long-term investment ETFs. The names of such products authorized by the SFC must not be labeled as ETFs; they must be named "Leveraged Product" or "Inverse Product" based on the product type. The name must clearly indicate the leverage/inverse multiple and include the word "Daily" to highlight the daily rebalancing feature.

Affected by the new regulations, CSOP announced on July 27 that its 2x leveraged and inverse products linked to individual stocks such as SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, NVIDIA, and Tesla will officially switch to the flexible leverage structure on August 3. Under extreme market conditions, the leverage can be reduced to as low as 1.1x (for inverse products, as low as -1.1x under extreme conditions), and the product names will be changed accordingly.

Screenshot from CSOP official website

Guo Yiming, Investment Advisor Director at Jufeng Investment Consulting, told China News Service that previous 2x leveraged fund products strictly amplified daily gains and losses by two times regardless of underlying volatility or market liquidity tightness. Once a heavily weighted stock experiences a sharp single-day fluctuation, the fund's swap exposure would quickly max out, and market makers, to control risks, could only passively close positions. This easily led to a significant disconnect between the product's net asset value and the underlying stock's performance, causing premiums to plummet, with risks borne entirely by investors and the issuer.

"After switching to the flexible leverage mechanism, the product retains the maximum leverage cap of 2x, but the fund can now reduce the actual leverage daily based on factors like the individual stock's trading activity, remaining swap quota, and intraday volatility. In extreme market conditions, the leverage can be lowered to a minimum of 1.1x. At the same time, new mandatory requirements are added, such as daily disclosure of real-time leverage and renaming products to indicate variable leverage," Guo Yiming said.

In Guo Yiming's view, compared to the old mechanism, the issuer significantly reduces operational risks during extreme market conditions and mitigates significant premium/discount anomalies. For ordinary investors, the biggest change is that the profit and loss elasticity is no longer constant; during highly volatile periods, the amplitude of gains or losses will be far lower than the original fixed 2x level. This also means investors can no longer rely on the previous fixed two-fold trading prediction and must check the disclosed actual leverage for each day before trading.

Guo Yiming warned that such products are only suitable for short-term speculation and not for medium- to long-term holding, and investors should be mindful of the risks.

This article is from the WeChat public account "China News Service" (ID: jwview), author: Wei Wei.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what record did SK Hynix's stock price hit on July 29th?

AOn July 29th, SK Hynix's stock price fell by over 19% in intraday trading, setting a record for its largest single-day percentage decline in history.

QHow much did the 'CSOP 2x Leveraged SK Hynix Product' fall from its June 25th peak to its July 29th closing price?

AThe 'CSOP 2x Leveraged SK Hynix Product' fell by 83% from its peak of HKD 193.65 on June 25th to its closing price of HKD 32.70 on July 29th.

QWhat major change will happen to the 2x leveraged products linked to stocks like SK Hynix and Nvidia starting August 3rd, as announced by CSOP Asset Management?

AStarting August 3rd, the 2x leveraged products will officially switch to a flexible leverage mechanism. Under extreme market conditions, the leverage ratio can be adjusted down to a minimum of 1.1x (or -1.1x for inverse products).

QDespite reporting massive profit growth, why did SK Hynix's Q2 2026 financial results disappoint the market?

ASK Hynix's Q2 2026 revenue and operating profit, while showing massive year-over-year growth (257% and 557% respectively), fell short of market expectations. Analysts cited factors like long-term supply agreements limiting short-term price increases and a higher mix of HBM chips, which saw smaller price gains.

QWhat is the key risk warning that investment advisor Guo Yiming gives regarding leveraged and inverse products like the one discussed?

AGuo Yiming warns that leveraged and inverse products are only suitable for short-term trading and speculation, not for medium to long-term holding. Investors must be aware of the significant risks involved.

Leituras Relacionadas

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

The article examines the significance of recent data showing China's total R&D expenditure, measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), catching up to or slightly surpassing that of the United States in 2024. It argues that while this milestone reflects China's immense capacity to mobilize research resources, the competition in semiconductors now extends far beyond sheer financial input. The analysis highlights key differences: China's R&D is heavily skewed towards experimental development (over 80%), focusing on product engineering and industrialization, whereas the U.S. allocates a proportionally larger share (about 15%) to basic research. Furthermore, leading U.S. semiconductor firms reinvest a significant portion of their substantial global sales revenue into R&D, creating a sustainable commercial innovation cycle that is difficult to replicate. The article emphasizes that semiconductor progress depends on converting R&D into commercially viable products that pass rigorous customer validation and achieve repeat orders, not just on spending levels. It concludes that as China enters the top tier of R&D spenders, the critical challenges shift to improving resource allocation efficiency, fostering long-term basic research, and building effective mechanisms to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and reliable, market-ready industrial capabilities.

marsbitHá 26m

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

marsbitHá 26m

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

AI Worsens Wealth Inequality as Top 10% of US Families Garner 88% of Stock Gains (2019-2026) A report from the China Finance 40 Forum highlights that the AI boom is significantly widening wealth inequality in the United States. From 2019 to Q1 2026, wealth from directly held stocks by US households nearly doubled from $29 trillion to approximately $55 trillion, with rapid growth concentrated post-2023, coinciding with the AI-driven stock market surge. The distribution of these gains has been starkly uneven. Between 2022 and Q1 2026, the wealth increase of about $21 trillion was captured almost entirely by the wealthiest families: the top 10% secured roughly 88% ($18.5 trillion), while the bottom 50% received only about 1% ($0.2 trillion). This has contributed to a growing disparity in disposable income shares. The report, referencing economic historian Robert Allen, draws parallels to historical technological shifts like the "Engels' Pause" during the First Industrial Revolution, where worker wages stagnated despite productivity gains. It suggests AI could induce a similar period where capital收益 outpace labor income, exacerbating inequality. Huang Yiping of Peking University identifies four mechanisms through which AI impacts income distribution: capital-bias (reducing labor's income share), task polarization (hollowing out middle-skill jobs), skill-based digital divides, and wealth amplification through assets. He warns that if this trend continues, strong supply growth driven by AI could be undermined by persistently weak consumer demand, threatening sustainable economic growth. To address these challenges, the report proposes a three-pronged strategy: 1) Defensive measures like strengthening social safety nets and antitrust enforcement; 2) Empowering workers through education reform and lifelong learning to collaborate with AI; and 3) Rebalancing via policies such as potential taxes on AI超额收益 and mechanisms for broader sharing of technology's benefits, ensuring AI's红利 are more equitably distributed.

marsbitHá 32m

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

marsbitHá 32m

Trading

Spot
活动图片