Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-23Última atualização em 2026-05-23

Resumo

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opport...

During the week of May 15-19, 2026, long-term US Treasury yields soared to multi-year highs. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury note climbed to 4.61% on May 18, marking a one-year high, and further rose to 4.687% on May 19. The yield on the 30-year US Treasury bond surged to 5.2%, its highest level since 2007. The S&P 500 index fell over 1% on May 15 and dropped another 0.67% on May 19, closing lower for the third consecutive session. The Nasdaq Composite declined by 0.90%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 index fell by 1.33%.

Multiple factors are converging simultaneously. Inflation data exceeded expectations. Wholesale prices in April rose 6% year-over-year, indicating the highest upstream inflationary pressure in years. The trajectory of US debt continues to deteriorate. A new Federal Reserve Chair has taken on the most complex inflation situation in years. A massive tax cut bill is expected to add trillions of dollars to the national debt over the next decade.

The bond market is shouting, and the stock market is finally starting to listen.

Educational Note: US Treasury yields are the interest rates paid by the US government to borrow money. When yields rise, it means the government must pay higher interest to attract lenders—either because investors demand higher compensation for risk, or because the supply of bonds exceeds market demand.

Section 2 — Four Reasons for Rising Yields

Reason 1: Stubborn Inflation

The inflation data for April, released on May 15, exceeded market expectations and directly triggered an immediate surge in yields. Wholesale prices in April rose 6% year-over-year, the highest upstream inflation record in years, indicating that price pressures are not just at the consumer level but are propagating upward throughout the entire supply chain.

Since September 2024, the Federal Reserve has cumulatively cut interest rates by 175 basis points—100 bps in the second half of 2024, followed by another 75 bps in the second half of 2025. Typically, long-term yields should decline accordingly. However, the reality is quite the opposite: the 10-year yield has fallen by only about 35 basis points, while the 30-year yield has actually risen, touching 5.2%. In a widely circulated article, Mark Malek, Chief Investment Officer at Siebert Financial, stated bluntly that this divergence is "unprecedented": "Historical data tracing back to 1990 shows that there has never been such an anomalous disconnect between Fed policy and long-term yields."

Current market pricing shows that the probability of a rate hike by December 2026 has risen to 48%, whereas just a week ago this probability was only 14%. The probability of a rate cut is now below 1%. The bond market's expectation is no longer a "pause in cuts" but has begun pricing in a "return to hikes."

Reason 2: A New Fed Chair Inherits a Crisis

On May 13, 2026, the US Senate confirmed Kevin Warsh as the new Federal Reserve Chair by a vote of 54 to 45, making it the most controversial Fed Chair confirmation vote in history. His term officially began on May 15, upon the expiration of Jerome Powell's term. Powell chose to remain a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Warsh took over with US inflation having exceeded the Fed's 2% target for over five consecutive years, energy prices remaining elevated due to the US-Iran conflict, and the bond market calling for a clear return to fiscal discipline. JPMorgan now expects the Fed to keep rates unchanged throughout 2026, with the possibility of a 25 basis point hike as early as the third quarter of 2027. During his confirmation hearing, Warsh stated that the Fed needs a "different inflation response framework." His first chaired Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is scheduled for June 16-17, where every word will move the markets.

Reason 3: The Worsening US Debt Problem

The US annual fiscal deficit is approximately $2 trillion, with interest payments on the existing debt alone nearing $1 trillion per year. The Treasury Department expects to need to borrow $189 billion in the second quarter of 2026 alone, exceeding previous forecasts from months earlier by $79 billion. Actual borrowing in the first quarter of 2026 was $577 billion, with an expected $671 billion for the third quarter.

Every bond must find a willing buyer. When market supply exceeds natural demand, the only mechanism to restore balance is higher yields. The International Monetary Fund has warned that the "safety premium" of Treasury bonds—the extra demand they enjoy as the world's safest asset—is fading. Once that safety premium disappears, yields must rise to compensate.

Reason 4: The 'One Beautiful Bill' and Moody's Downgrade

The 'One Beautiful Bill' (OBBB), signed into law in 2025, made the tax cuts from Trump's first term permanent and added new tax-cutting provisions. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will increase fiscal deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade. If all temporary provisions were made permanent, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the cost could reach $4 to $5 trillion.

On May 16, 2025, Moody's downgraded the US sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, becoming the last of the three major rating agencies to do so. S&P completed its downgrade as early as 2011, and Fitch followed in 2023. Moody's cited successive governments' failure to effectively address persistent deficits and rising interest costs. By 2035, federal interest payments are projected to consume 30% of fiscal revenue, compared to 18% in 2024 and just 9% in 2021.

A Bank of America survey released on May 19 shows that 62% of global fund managers expect the 30-year Treasury yield to eventually reach 6%, the most pessimistic bond market consensus since late 1999. The term "bond vigilante" has returned to market discourse—a concept coined by Wall Street veteran Ed Yardeni in the 1980s to describe traders who sell bonds to punish fiscal profligacy, pushing yields higher to force governments to face fiscal issues. Today's version of the bond vigilante, as Malek puts it, is conducting "a slow, systematic campaign of pressure."

Educational Note: The yield curve is a graph showing the relationship between Treasury yields of different maturities. When long-term yields rise much faster than short-term yields, it is called a "bear steepener." This typically signals investor concern about long-term inflation and fiscal sustainability, even if short-term policy rates remain relatively stable.

Section 3 — Why Rising Yields Impact the Stock Market

Rising yields exert pressure on the stock market through four distinct channels.

Channel 1: The Discounting Effect

The value of any stock is equal to the present value of all its future earnings. A higher discount rate leads to a lower present value. Rising yields directly increase the discount rate, hitting high-growth tech stocks the hardest, as a significant portion of their value comes from future earnings expected years later. 2022 serves as the best reference: the 10-year yield surged from 1.5% to 4.3%, the Nasdaq Composite fell 33% cumulatively, and Nvidia was more than halved, losing over 50%. Most of those losses came from compression in valuation multiples, not deterioration in earnings. The pace in 2026 is more gradual, but the mechanism is identical.

Channel 2: The Competition Effect and Equity Risk Premium

When risk-free 30-year government bonds offer a yield as high as 5.2%, stocks must offer returns significantly higher than that to convince investors to take on additional risk. Currently, the S&P 500's earnings yield is approximately 4.2%, while the 10-year Treasury yield is 4.6%. This means investors are technically receiving lower returns from stocks than from risk-free Treasuries—an unusual and unsustainable state. The equity risk premium has been compressed close to zero. Historical patterns suggest this state eventually resolves either through lower stock prices or a decline in yields. Currently, yields are not declining.

Channel 3: The Borrowing Cost Effect

When Treasury yields rise, borrowing costs increase throughout the economy. As of mid-May 2026, the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage had risen to between 6.34% and 6.54%. Corporate financing costs increase, and consumer spending on housing, cars, and credit cards is suppressed. The bond market's signal ultimately reaches every household and every corporate balance sheet.

Channel 4: The Strong Dollar and International Capital Flows Effect

Rising US yields attract global capital into dollar-denominated assets, pushing up the US dollar exchange rate and putting pressure on the translated overseas earnings of US multinational corporations. For Asian investors, capital flows to the US put pressure on Asian currencies, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and yield-oriented assets. This round of rising yields has global resonance: UK 10-year gilt yields broke above 5.1%, Japanese Government Bond yields reached 2.71%—their highest since 1997—and German Bund yields also climbed in sync. When global bonds are sold off together, the pressure on stock markets is amplified everywhere.

Educational Note: The equity risk premium is the extra return investors demand from stocks relative to the risk-free rate. With the S&P 500 earnings yield at approximately 4.2% and the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.6%, stocks are technically less attractive than bonds. This compressed premium state has historically been a precursor to stock market weakness, as capital tends to flow towards higher-yielding, lower-risk assets.

Section 4 — Impact on Different Types of Investors

Stock Investors

The environment is more challenging for high-valuation growth stocks. Banks, insurance companies, and value-oriented cyclical stocks often perform relatively better in a rising yield environment, as wider net interest margins benefit financials. Technology stocks, REITs, and utility stocks face the most pressure.

Bond Investors

Note: Short-term bonds currently offer attractive yields near 4% to 4.5%, with relatively low price volatility risk. Most analysts favor intermediate-term bonds (5 to 10 years) as the best balance between yield and risk management. Long-term bonds (20 to 30 years) carry the greatest price downside risk if yields continue to rise.

Income Investors

Are experiencing the most attractive fixed-income environment in over a decade. A 10-year Treasury yield of 4.6% represents a tangible, solid fixed income. Investment-grade corporate bonds offer spreads above Treasuries, providing even richer returns. For investors holding to maturity, the appeal of locking in current yield levels far exceeds any opportunities available in 2020 or 2021.

Section 5 — Key Developments to Watch

Warsh's First Chaired FOMC Meeting, June 16-17. This is the most important near-term event. Any signal he gives regarding policy direction—whether tolerating inflation or leaning toward tightening—will significantly impact bond and stock markets.

US Inflation Data. Monthly CPI and PCE releases will determine whether rate hike expectations strengthen further. April's 6% wholesale price increase indicates upstream pressures haven't eased.

US Treasury Bond Auction Results. Weak auction demand suggests the supply-demand imbalance persists, reinforcing upward pressure on yields.

The 30-Year Yield Approaching 6%. Ian Lyngen, head of rates at BMO, previously stated that if the 30-year yield consistently holds above 5.25%, it would trigger a "more sustained correction" in stock valuations. The 30-year yield is currently at 5.2%. The consensus forecast from Bank of America targets 6%. The critical point for a structural valuation reassessment in equities is approaching.

Framework for Allocation Strategies in the Current Environment:

Stock Investors: Consider moderate rotation from long-duration growth stocks towards value stocks, financials, and sectors with robust current earnings.

Bond Investors: Prefer intermediate-term bonds and high-quality investment-grade credit over long-term Treasuries.

Income Investors: Current yield levels represent a rare opportunity in over a decade to lock in quality yields.

The equity risk premium is near zero. The 30-year yield is at its highest since 2007. A new Fed Chair faces an inflation conundrum. Bond vigilantes are back. The bond market's message couldn't be clearer: the era of cheap government borrowing is over. Whether the stock market can digest this reality smoothly or if something ultimately breaks will be the core question for markets in the second half of 2026.

The above investment views are cited from a BIT guest analyst and do not represent the official position of BIT.

Since its launch in February 2026, BIT's (formerly Matrixport) US stock business has seen Assets Under Management (AUM) surpass $200 million. Driven by AI, the US stock market continues to attract global investor attention. Leveraging over seven years of institutional service expertise and compliance licensing, BIT has successfully bridged the boundary between digital assets and traditional finance, helping investors quickly capture investment opportunities.

Data Sources

CNBC, "30-Year Treasury Yield Breaks Above 5.19%, Highest Level Since Financial Crisis," May 19, 2026.
CNN Business, "30-Year US Treasury Yield Rises to Highest Since 2007," May 19, 2026.
Federal Reserve FRED Database, 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate, May 18, 2026.
TheStreet, Market Day, May 19, 2026, and May 15, 2026.
CNBC, "Kevin Warsh Confirmed as New Federal Reserve Chair," May 13, 2026.
Yahoo Finance, "Warsh Confirmed as New Fed Chair as Inflation Heats Up," May 2026.
J.P. Morgan Global Research, "The Fed's Next Move," April 2026.
Fortune, "The Bond Market Is Shouting," May 2026.
HeyGotrade, "10-Year Treasury at 4.6%: How Rising Yields Are Reshaping the 2026 Stock Market," May 2026.
Mercer Media, "30-Year Treasury Yield Surpasses 5.1%," May 2026.
Allianz Global Investors, Analysis of Moody's Downgrade, 2025.
Fidelity Investments, US Credit Rating Downgrade, May 2025.
Wikipedia, "One Beautiful Bill" entry.
Price, "Impact of US Tax Bill on Economy and Bond Market," July 2025.
Bank of America Asset Management, "Impact of Interest Rate Changes on the Bond Market," April 2026.
Data as of May 19, 2026.

Risk Warnings and Disclaimer

The views expressed in this report reflect market analysis as of the report date. Market conditions can change rapidly, and related views may be adjusted without further notice.
The data cited in this report is sourced from public channels. BIT makes no guarantees regarding its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. This report is intended for financial education and market information reference only, reflecting market conditions and the research team's views at the time of writing. All content does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation for any financial product. Third-party forecasts and market views referenced in the report do not represent BIT's position and have not been independently verified.
Market forecasts mentioned in the report (including, but not limited to, specific figures such as "30-year yield at 6%") are results of market surveys at a single point in time and do not constitute predictions or guarantees of future market movements.
Investment involves multiple risks: market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, exchange rate risk, liquidity risk, etc. Investors may lose part or all of their principal.
Past performance and market returns are not indicative of future results.
This report does not constitute investment advice for any specific investor. Investors should make independent investment decisions based on their own financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, consulting licensed professional advisors when necessary.
This report is intended for qualified investors only and is not provided to residents of other jurisdictions where it is legally prohibited.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what were the main drivers behind the surge in U.S. Treasury yields to multi-year highs in mid-May 2026?

AThe article cites four main drivers: 1) Persistently high and unexpected inflation, particularly in wholesale prices; 2) The new Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh taking office amid a complex inflationary environment; 3) A deteriorating U.S. debt trajectory and massive borrowing needs; 4) The fiscal impact of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB) and the subsequent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating by Moody's.

QWhat is the 'bond vigilante' phenomenon mentioned in the article, and how is it relevant to the current market situation?

AThe term 'bond vigilante,' coined by Ed Yardeni in the 1980s, refers to traders who sell bonds to punish fiscal profligacy, thereby pushing up yields to force governments to address fiscal issues. The article states that this concept has re-emerged, with current market participants engaging in a 'slow and systematic campaign of pressure' due to concerns over the U.S. deficit and debt sustainability, contributing to the rise in long-term yields.

QHow does the rise in bond yields negatively impact the stock market, according to the mechanisms described in the article?

AThe article describes four channels: 1) The Discount Effect: Higher yields increase the discount rate, lowering the present value of future earnings, especially for growth stocks. 2) The Competition Effect & Equity Risk Premium: High risk-free Treasury yields make stocks less attractive unless they offer significantly higher returns, compressing the equity risk premium. 3) The Borrowing Cost Effect: Rising yields increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, dampening economic activity. 4) The Dollar & Capital Flow Effect: Higher U.S. yields attract global capital, strengthening the dollar and pressuring overseas earnings of multinationals.

QWhat specific investment implications does the article suggest for different types of investors in this high-yield environment?

AFor stock investors: Favor value stocks, financials, and cyclicals over high-valuation growth stocks, tech, REITs, and utilities. For bond investors: Prefer short to intermediate-term bonds (5-10 years) over long-term bonds (20-30 years) to balance yield and price volatility risk. For income investors: Current yield levels (e.g., 4.6% on 10-year Treasuries) represent an attractive opportunity to lock in solid fixed income returns, superior to opportunities in 2020-2021.

QWhat key upcoming event does the article identify as the most important for markets to watch, and why?

AThe first Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting chaired by new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh on June 16-17, 2026. The article states that any indication from him regarding future policy direction—whether tolerating inflation or leaning towards tightening—will have a significant impact on both bond and stock markets, as investors seek clarity on the Fed's approach under his leadership.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHá 13h

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHá 13h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHá 13h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHá 13h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHá 13h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHá 13h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHá 13h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHá 13h

Trading

Spot
活动图片