DeFi Education Fund Urges Senators To Reject Proposed Amendments In Crypto Bill Markup

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-01-15Última atualização em 2026-01-15

Resumo

The DeFi Education Fund is urging the Senate Banking Committee to reject specific proposed amendments to a new crypto market structure bill, warning they could harm the DeFi ecosystem and software developers. Key concerns include #42 (Reed, Kim), authorizing Treasury to sanction smart contracts; #45 (Reed), creating a new digital asset definition under the Bank Secrecy Act; and #47 (Reed), removing a provision on unlicensed money transmission. Amendments #72 and #73 (Cortez Masto) aim to narrow developer definitions and expand FinCEN's authority, while #74 and #75 could stifle growth by prohibiting transactions with unlawful protocols. Amendment #104 (Warren) would strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto. The fund argues these changes pose significant risks to innovation and operational flexibility in the decentralized finance space.

As the Senate Banking Committee prepares to mark up the newly proposed draft of the crypto market structure bill, the DeFi Education Fund has released a list of amendments it strongly urges senators to oppose.

In a recent post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), the organization expressed concerns that the descriptions of the draft indicate potential harm to decentralized finance (DeFi) and could negatively impact software developers.

Red Flags Emerge From Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft

In its message, the DeFi Education Fund emphasized the importance of safeguarding the integrity of the emerging DeFi landscape and called on senators to consider the far-reaching consequences of these proposed changes.

Among the amendments highlighted were Amendment #42, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities.

This amendment raised significant red flags for advocates who worry about its implications for innovation and operational flexibility within the decentralized finance ecosystem.

Another amendment of concern, Amendment #45 by Senator Reed, aims to create a specific definition for digital assets under the Bank Secrecy Act.

Similarly, Amendment #47, also from Senator Reed, intends to remove a provision related to federal criminal offense concerning unlicensed money transmission.

These changes, according to the DeFi Education Fund, loom dangerously over the operational landscape for developers and financial institutions that interact with digital assets.

Stifling DeFi Growth

Additionally, Senators Cortez Masto’s proposed amendments, specifically #72 and #73, aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) alongside the Treasury for blockchain-enabled platforms.

Amendments #74 and #75 further seek to strengthen existing laws related to money transmission and prohibit transactions involving unlawful DeFi protocols, which the Fund suggests could stifle the industry’s growth.

Amendment #104, proposed by crypto-skeptic Senator Elizabeth Warren, also drew attention by striking a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

This follows similar calls by Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, who recently claimed that the “Big Bank Lobby” is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards, further highlighting the current state of the future of crypto in Congress.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap recovery above $3.2 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern expressed by the DeFi Education Fund regarding the proposed crypto market structure bill?

AThe DeFi Education Fund is concerned that the proposed amendments could harm the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and negatively impact software developers.

QWhich amendment, proposed by Senators Reed and Kim, has raised significant red flags for DeFi advocates?

AAmendment #42, which seeks to authorize the Treasury to sanction smart contracts and centralized platforms involved in illicit activities, has raised significant red flags.

QWhat is the purpose of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Amendment #104 according to the article?

AAmendment #104, proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren, aims to strike a key distribution carve-out for crypto offerings.

QWhich senators proposed amendments to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand FinCEN's authority?

ASenator Cortez Masto proposed amendments #72 and #73, which aim to narrow the definition of non-controlling developers and expand the authority of FinCEN and the Treasury.

QWhat recent claim did Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, make about the 'Big Bank Lobby'?

ASummer Mersinger claimed that the 'Big Bank Lobby' is pushing Congress to change key provisions of the already enacted GENIUS Act concerning stablecoin rewards.

Leituras Relacionadas

Micron CEO's Latest Interview: 'Storage' is an Overlooked Bottleneck in AI, Supply Constraints to Continue

Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra emphasizes that memory and storage are a critical, yet underestimated, bottleneck for AI development, stating that the "AI race is not just a compute race, it's a memory race." He argues that AI's evolution—driven by larger models, longer context windows, and growing token consumption—demands not only more computing power but significantly enhanced "memory" or storage capacity and bandwidth. Mehrotra highlights a structural supply constraint, predicting tight industry supply will persist beyond 2026. Building new fabs takes 3-4 years, with subsequent ramp-up periods. Furthermore, advancing technology nodes yield diminishing bit output gains per wafer. He notes that the manufacturing complexity of memory, involving physics, chemistry, and mass production precision, is vastly underappreciated. Despite announcing a $200 billion U.S. manufacturing investment, Mehrotra underscores that such decisions are based on disciplined analysis of data, technology trends, and customer needs, not speculation. He expresses no doubt about the long-term opportunity in memory, driven by AI's early-stage growth, while emphasizing the need for resilience, agility, and long-term focus to navigate industry cycles.

marsbitHá 2m

Micron CEO's Latest Interview: 'Storage' is an Overlooked Bottleneck in AI, Supply Constraints to Continue

marsbitHá 2m

SemiAnalysis Report Claims Delay in Two Key Technologies, Triggers Sharp Decline in 'Optoelectronics', Sparking Online Debate Over CPO

A report from analysis firm SemiAnalysis, claiming significant delays in two key AI data center technologies, triggered a sharp sell-off in the photonics sector and sparked intense online debate. The report, dated June 10, states that NVIDIA's 800VDC power architecture rollout is pushed to 2028 and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) mass production is likely delayed until 2028 or even 2029. Following the news, U.S. optical communication stocks fell sharply, with AAOI dropping 17% and Lumentum down about 8%. The delays were attributed to engineering challenges like photonic engine yield and cost-effectiveness, not a disappearance of demand. Simultaneously, an interview with NVIDIA's networking SVP Gilad Shainer presented an opposing, optimistic view, stating CPO is "the most exciting thing" and shipments would begin scaling in the second half of the year. This contradiction fueled debate on social media. Bears pointed to unresolved reliability and maintenance hurdles for CPO. Bulls argued the delay simply redirects capital to interim solutions like traditional pluggable optical modules and NPO (Near-Packaged Optics), extending their revenue runway. Some users questioned the report's internal logic and timing, noting similar views had circulated earlier. Analysts highlighted potential beneficiaries, including companies in the 1.6T pluggable modules, NPO, and 400VDC power transition supply chains. The consensus suggests the market reaction reflects a recalibration of the technology adoption timeline rather than a fundamental weakening of AI infrastructure demand, with key bottlenecks like power, storage, and GPUs remaining unchanged.

marsbitHá 3m

SemiAnalysis Report Claims Delay in Two Key Technologies, Triggers Sharp Decline in 'Optoelectronics', Sparking Online Debate Over CPO

marsbitHá 3m

Reuters Investigation: Trump Family's Crypto Empire Cashed Out $2.3 Billion, Investors Incurred Nearly Equal Losses

Reuters Investigation: Trump Family's Crypto Empire Reportedly Cashed Out $2.3 Billion. A Reuters investigation reveals that from November 2024 to April 2026, entities linked to former US President Donald Trump earned approximately $2.3 billion in pretax revenue from four cryptocurrency projects. These projects are World Liberty Financial, the TRUMP meme coin, ALT5 Sigma (renamed AI Financial Corp.), and American Bitcoin. The revenue, derived largely from token sale royalties, founder allocations, and equity stakes, reportedly eclipsed the $2.1 billion profit posted by Coinbase during the same period. It also far exceeded earnings from major industry players like BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF business and top miner IREN. The report highlights an asymmetrical risk model where the Trump family allegedly invested minimal personal capital. However, over one million retail and public market investors are estimated to have absorbed nearly equivalent losses of about $2.25 billion. For instance, the TRUMP meme coin has lost around 98% of its value from its peak, and public companies like ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin have seen their stock prices collapse after raising funds linked to these ventures. The core leverage for these projects is identified as brand licensing and political influence rather than traditional business infrastructure.

marsbitHá 18m

Reuters Investigation: Trump Family's Crypto Empire Cashed Out $2.3 Billion, Investors Incurred Nearly Equal Losses

marsbitHá 18m

U.S. Stock Market Trend: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Intraday Before a Remarkable Recovery, All Eyes on CPI Tomorrow

"US Stock Market Trends: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Before Dramatic Recovery, Eyes on Tomorrow's CPI" On Tuesday, US markets experienced a wild swing. The Nasdaq initially surged nearly 0.7% before plummeting to a 3.5% intraday loss following a post by Donald Trump on Truth Social. He stated that Iran had shot down a US Apache helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz and that the US "must...respond." The index, however, staged a remarkable recovery in the final two hours, closing down only 0.97%, as subsequent remarks from Trump and Vice President Vance suggested a potential Iran deal within days. The S&P 500 fell 0.26%, while the Dow Jones gained 0.17%, supported by its non-tech components. This incident marked the first loss of a US military asset since tensions with Iran escalated in late February. Despite the event, crude oil prices fell sharply (WTI -3.93%) due to expectations of a near-term deal, OPEC+ plans to increase output, and fears that strong jobs data could lead to Fed rate hikes. Market attention is now laser-focused on the May CPI data release Wednesday morning. This report is seen as critical evidence for whether hot job growth is fueling inflation and will heavily influence expectations for the Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting. A hotter-than-expected reading could trigger further sell-offs, particularly in tech, while a cooler print could spark a significant rebound. The article notes a clear sector rotation, with money flowing out of tech (Nasdaq down over 5% in a week) into defensive sectors like healthcare and consumer staples. Other assets like gold and Bitcoin also remain under pressure. The overarching sentiment is one of "war fatigue," with markets desperately awaiting concrete results from the prolonged Iran negotiations rather than reacting to each new headline.

marsbitHá 35m

U.S. Stock Market Trend: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Intraday Before a Remarkable Recovery, All Eyes on CPI Tomorrow

marsbitHá 35m

Second Only to GPUs and Memory: MLCCs Are Becoming the Next Billion-Dollar Windfall for AI Computing Power

After GPU and memory, MLCC (Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitors) is emerging as the next critical component in AI compute, potentially a multi-billion-dollar market. The article highlights a significant, industry-wide price increase for MLCCs, driven not by inventory cycles but by a fundamental, structural demand surge from AI and automotive sectors. AI servers require exponentially more MLCCs than traditional servers—from 2,000 to over 350,000 units per high-end AI rack—primarily to stabilize power for increasingly powerful, low-voltage GPUs. A key AI server's MLCC cost can reach thousands of dollars, making it the third-largest cost component after GPUs and memory. This demand is compounded by the automotive shift to EVs and advanced ADAS. Supply, however, struggles to keep up. Manufacturing high-end MLCCs involves extreme precision and faces six major barriers: proprietary technology, long customer certification cycles (12-18 months for AI), high capital intensity, patent thickets, specialized talent, and massive scale. Industry capacity grows at only ~10% annually, creating a persistent supply-demand gap projected to last until 2030. Three companies dominate this high-end market. **Murata** (40% global share) is the stable leader. **Samsung Electro-Mechanics** offers the highest growth elasticity with aggressive expansion. **Taiyo Yuden** is the purest MLCC play. While their current P/E ratios appear high, they are expected to compress rapidly as earnings surge, powered by significant pricing power and operational leverage. Key risks include a potential slowdown in AI capex, high valuations, competition from Chinese manufacturers in lower tiers, yen appreciation, and consumer electronics weakness. The article concludes that MLCCs are transforming from a commoditized component into a strategic, capacity-constrained asset essential for the AI-powered future.

marsbitHá 1h

Second Only to GPUs and Memory: MLCCs Are Becoming the Next Billion-Dollar Windfall for AI Computing Power