DeepSeek V4 Finally Released, Breaking the Strongest Closed-Source Monopoly, Explicitly Partnering with Huawei Chips

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-24Última atualização em 2026-04-24

Resumo

DeepSeek AI has officially released DeepSeek-V4, available in two versions: the high-performance **DeepSeek-V4-Pro** (49B activated parameters, 1.6T total) and the more efficient **DeepSeek-V4-Flash** (13B activated parameters, 284B total). Both support a 1M context length, making long-context capability a baseline feature rather than a premium offering. The Pro version rivals top closed-source models in agent capabilities, world knowledge, and reasoning performance. It outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.5 in agentic coding and approaches Claude Opus 4.6 (non-thinking mode) in quality. The Flash version offers competitive performance at a lower cost, though it lags in highly complex tasks. A key technical innovation is a new attention mechanism that reduces computational and memory demands for long contexts. The models are optimized for agent frameworks like Claude Code and OpenClaw. API services are available with support for both OpenAI and Anthropic-style interfaces. DeepSeek also announced upcoming support for Huawei’s computing hardware in the second half of the year. The models are open-sourced on Hugging Face and ModelScope.

Just now, DeepSeek-V4 is here!

The preview version is officially launched and simultaneously open-sourced.

There are two versions in total:

DeepSeek-V4-Pro: Comparable to top closed-source models, 1.6T, 49B activated, 1M context length;

DeepSeek-V4-Flash: A smaller and faster economical version, 284B, 13B activated, 1M context length.

The official statement is: It leads domestically and in the open-source field in Agent capabilities, world knowledge, and reasoning performance.

And:

Currently, DeepSeek-V4 has become the Agentic Coding model used by company employees. According to evaluation feedback, the user experience is better than Sonnet 4.5, and the delivery quality is close to Opus 4.6 non-thinking mode. However, there is still a certain gap compared to the Opus 4.6 thinking model.

Currently, both the official website and the app have been updated, and the API service has also been synchronized.

Regarding the much-concerned domestic computing power, the key point is: Support for Huawei computing power in the second half of the year.

Top-Tier and Cost-Effective Choices, Two Versions Launched Together

This time, V4 releases two versions at once.

V4-Pro, performance comparable to top closed-source models.

The official judgment has three points:

Significantly improved Agent capabilities: In the Agentic Coding evaluation, V4-Pro has reached the best level among current open-source models and also performed excellently in other Agent-related evaluations. In internal evaluations, in Agent Coding mode, the V4 experience is better than Sonnet 4.5, and the delivery quality is close to Opus 4.6 non-thinking mode, but there is still a certain gap compared to the Opus 4.6 thinking mode.

Rich world knowledge: In world knowledge evaluations, DeepSeek-V4-Pro significantly leads other open-source models, only slightly inferior to the top closed-source model Gemini-Pro-3.1.

World-class reasoning performance: In evaluations of mathematics, STEM, and competitive code, DeepSeek-V4-Pro surpasses all currently publicly evaluated open-source models and achieves excellent results comparable to the world's top closed-source models.

V4-Flash, a smaller and faster economical version. Reasoning ability is close to Pro, world knowledge reserve is slightly inferior, but with smaller parameters and activation, and cheaper API.

In Agent tasks, DeepSeek-V4-Flash is on par with DeepSeek-V4-Pro in simple tasks, but there is still a gap in high-difficulty tasks.

In the car wash test, V4 also passed quickly.

In the classic biological scenario "Desperate Father," DeepSeek-V4 did not immediately grasp the key point of red-green color blindness in one round (according to genetic rules, if a female is red-green color blind, her biological father must be as well).

Million Context Length Becomes Standard

It is worth mentioning that from today, 1M context length is standard for all DeepSeek official services.

A year ago, 1M context length was Gemini's exclusive trump card; all other closed-source models were either 128K or 200K; on the open-source side, almost no one could afford this level.

DeepSeek directly moved the million context length from a "high-end feature" to "basic infrastructure."

And it's open source. How did they do it? The release directly gave the answer—

V4 has created a new attention mechanism that compresses at the token dimension and is used in combination with DSA sparse attention. Compared to traditional methods, the demand for computation and memory is significantly reduced.

DSA is not a new term. It was first introduced in the V3.2-Exp update half a year ago. At that time, external attention was low because the benchmark scores were almost the same as V3.1-Terminus, making it seem like an insignificant intermediate version.

Looking back now, that was the foundation of V4.

Special Optimization for Agent Capabilities

On the Agent side, V4 has been adapted and optimized for mainstream Agent products such as Claude Code, OpenClaw, OpenCode, CodeBuddy, etc., with improvements in code tasks and document generation tasks.

The release also included an example of a PPT inner page generated by V4-Pro under a certain Agent framework.

API Pricing

On the API side, V4-Pro and V4-Flash are simultaneously launched, supporting both OpenAI ChatCompletions interface and Anthropic interface.

The base_url remains unchanged, just change the model parameter to deepseek-v4-pro or deepseek-v4-flash to call.

Both versions have a maximum context length of 1M and support both non-thinking mode and thinking mode. In thinking mode, the intensity can be adjusted through the reasoning_effort parameter, with two levels: high and max. The official recommendation is to directly use max for complex Agent scenarios.

Here is a key point—Support for Huawei computing power in the second half of the year.

In addition, old model names will be discontinued.

deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner will be discontinued three months later (July 24, 2026). During the current phase, these two names point to the non-thinking and thinking modes of V4-Flash, respectively.

It has little impact on individual developers; just change one model parameter. Companies with production environments need to migrate during these three months.

One more thing

At the end of the release, DeepSeek quoted a sentence.

"Not tempted by praise, not frightened by slander, follow the path and act,端正自己端正自己 (correct oneself)."

This is a sentence from Xunzi's "Non-Twelve Masters." The literal meaning is: not tempted by praise, not frightened by slander, move forward according to the path one believes in, and correct oneself.

In today's context, it's somewhat interesting.

Over the past six months, rumors about when V4 would be released, whether it was delayed, whether it had been surpassed by others, whether it had been compromised by Claude's distilled data, etc., have circulated back and forth in both Chinese and English AI circles. At the beginning of the year, some even confidently said that V4 would be released before the Spring Festival, but it wasn't until the end of April.

They never responded once.

Then, on a Friday afternoon, they released V4, simultaneously open-sourced it, simultaneously launched it on the official website and app, simultaneously updated the API, and even wrote into the release that internal employees have already abandoned Claude.

No roadmap, no live stream, no interviews.

The four words "率道而行" (follow the path and act) sound like a slogan. But if you look at the path over the past six months: the V3.2 "unremarkable" Exp version, the DSA sparse attention that paved the way for V4 for half a year, and the path of making 1M context length from a trump card to a standard feature.

DeepSeek has already done it.

DeepSeek-V4 model open-source links:

[1]https://huggingface.co/collections/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4

[2]https://modelscope.cn/collections/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4

DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro/blob/main/DeepSeek_V4.pdf

This article is from the WeChat public account "QbitAI", author: QbitAI

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two versions of DeepSeek-V4 that were released, and what are their key specifications?

ADeepSeek-V4 was released in two versions: DeepSeek-V4-Pro and DeepSeek-V4-Flash. The Pro version has 1.6T parameters with 49B activated and a 1M context length. The Flash version is a smaller, faster, and more economical model with 284B parameters, 13B activated, and also a 1M context length.

QAccording to the article, how does DeepSeek-V4-Pro's performance compare to top closed-source models like Anthropic's Opus 4.6?

AAccording to internal evaluations, DeepSeek-V4-Pro's performance in Agent Coding mode is better than Sonnet 4.5 and its delivery quality is close to Opus 4.6 in non-thinking mode, but it still has a gap compared to Opus 4.6 in thinking mode.

QWhat major technical achievement is highlighted for the DeepSeek-V4 models regarding context length?

AA major technical achievement is that a 1M context length has become the standard for all DeepSeek official services. This was achieved through a novel attention mechanism that compresses at the token dimension and is combined with DSA sparse attention, significantly reducing computational and memory requirements.

QWhat significant partnership or hardware support is announced for the future of DeepSeek's models?

AThe article announces that DeepSeek will support Huawei's computing power in the second half of the year.

QWhere can users find the open-source models and the technical report for DeepSeek-V4?

AThe open-source models can be found on Hugging Face and ModelScope collections under 'deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4'. The technical report is available at: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro/blob/main/DeepSeek_V4.pdf

Leituras Relacionadas

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHá 11m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHá 11m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHá 20m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHá 20m

Trading

Spot
活动图片