Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-20Última atualização em 2026-05-20

Resumo

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum Blockchain Turns 11 Years Old. How 'Ether' Has Grown and What's Next

Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, celebrated its 11th anniversary on July 30. The blockchain's genesis block was launched in 2015. Its ICO in 2014 raised approximately $18 million, setting the initial ETH price around $0.31. As of mid-2026, Ethereum's market capitalization exceeds $230 billion, and its price of $1,920 represents a growth of nearly 6,200 times from the ICO price. Despite this long-term growth, Ethereum's performance over the past five years has been challenging. After nearly reaching $5,000 in 2021 and again in 2025, its price had fallen about 60% from its 2021 peak by July 2026. This period coincided with governance stagnation following its transition to proof-of-stake in 2022 and ongoing discussions about its economic model and development funding. Recently, the Ethereum developer community has reignited efforts for a major ecosystem overhaul. Key focus areas include building AI infrastructure, enhancing network privacy and scalability, and even exploring quantum computing resistance. These initiatives, alongside efforts to attract more institutional investment, signal a new phase of development aimed at addressing fundamental challenges and propelling the network forward.

cryptonews.ruHá 30m

Ethereum Blockchain Turns 11 Years Old. How 'Ether' Has Grown and What's Next

cryptonews.ruHá 30m

Scammers Pose as Chinese Business Newspaper and Demand Bitcoin Ransom

Scammers are impersonating the Chinese newspaper China Business Journal to extort Bitcoin ransoms from companies. According to the publication, the criminals contacted businesses via the encrypted Swiss email service Proton Mail, threatening to publish allegedly compromising information obtained through "secret investigations" unless a Bitcoin ransom was paid. The exact ransom amount was not disclosed. China Business Journal has stated it has no connection to these emails and denounces the senders as fraudsters. The newspaper did not provide screenshots of the emails, name the targeted companies, or reveal the Bitcoin address for the ransom. The total financial losses to businesses are also unknown. The publication is now gathering evidence and plans to file civil and criminal lawsuits against the scheme's organizers. In a related development this year, Malaysian police arrested 22 Chinese nationals operating a fraudulent call center that promoted cryptocurrency investments, primarily targeting European victims, especially Italians.

cryptonews.ruHá 32m

Scammers Pose as Chinese Business Newspaper and Demand Bitcoin Ransom

cryptonews.ruHá 32m

Stock Trading Has Become 'Crypto Trading', Welcome Back to the Native Home

"Stock Trading Becomes 'Coin Trading': A Market's Bizarre Reversal" The global stock market, particularly in tech sectors, is undergoing a radical transformation, increasingly mirroring the volatile, narrative-driven mechanics of the cryptocurrency world. This shift was starkly illustrated by the dramatic crash of South Korea's KOSPI index in July 2026, where leveraged ETFs tied to stocks like SK Hynix triggered massive, rapid liquidations, devastating hundreds of thousands of retail investors, many of them young. This "crypto-fication" of equities began as disillusioned cryptocurrency traders migrated to stock markets, bringing with them their speculative playbook: chasing high-beta narratives like AI and semiconductor cycles, relying on social media for investment cues, and employing heavy leverage. Ironically, while these traders sought the perceived safety of stocks with fundamentals, their methods turned parts of the equity market—especially in Korea, the US, and Japan—into arenas of extreme speculation. Stocks like SK Hynix experienced price collapses ("halving") in just over a month, a pace even faster than Bitcoin's historical crashes. The core of this change is the primacy of narrative over traditional valuation. Complex company analysis is reduced to viral slogans about AI's infinite demand, driving concentrated inflows into thematic sectors. This is amplified by leverage, particularly through risky single-stock leveraged ETFs, which create vicious cycles of forced selling during downturns. Meanwhile, social media algorithms promote stories of overnight riches, drawing in inexperienced investors. In a paradoxical twist, Bitcoin, through institutional adoption and ETFs, is becoming relatively more stable, with its volatility now sometimes lower than major tech stocks. The market has reached an absurd crossover: stocks are acting like speculative crypto assets, while crypto strives for the legitimacy of traditional finance. The article concludes that this represents a "degeneration" of market rationality, where trading a story's heat has supplanted investing in future profits, leaving a trail of financial wreckage in its wake.

marsbitHá 37m

Stock Trading Has Become 'Crypto Trading', Welcome Back to the Native Home

marsbitHá 37m

A Market for Renting Human Faces for AI-Generated Content Emerges in China

A new biometric data licensing market has emerged in China, enabling citizens, former actors, extras, and influencers to legally rent their facial images for AI-generated content, such as micro-dramas, ads, and video games. Platforms like ActID and New Claw allow users to control usage rights and set prices, which range from $15 to $700 per image or series. This development is driven by the need for real human faces as a base, as fully synthetic faces are often unnatural and trigger the "uncanny valley" effect. Industry data indicates a massive shift toward AI, with AI-generated micro-dramas comprising over 95% of new releases in early 2026. Key features include detailed catalog filtering, strict user-defined usage restrictions, and no need for acting skills from providers. While this trend automates content creation and reduces reliance on traditional production, it raises concerns about data security, unauthorized cloning, and the lagging development of digital rights protection technologies. The situation parallels the early stock photography market, but now involves biometric digital templates, prompting questions about balancing commercial benefits with long-term personal data security.

cryptonews.ruHá 41m

A Market for Renting Human Faces for AI-Generated Content Emerges in China

cryptonews.ruHá 41m

Santander Bank Announces It Holds a $4.3 Million Position in U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs

Spanish banking giant Banco Santander disclosed in regulatory filings that it holds approximately $4.3 million in US spot Bitcoin ETFs. While this amount is small relative to the bank's over $1 trillion in assets under management, it signifies a growing trend of traditional financial institutions increasing Bitcoin exposure through regulated channels. Santander, scoring around 35% on a 2026 Bitcoin Adoption Index for banks, is categorized at a "medium level" of integration, similar to Société Générale but behind more crypto-focused firms. The bank's interest in cryptocurrencies is not new; CEO Ana Botín has discussed Bitcoin-related products since 2021. Santander has been developing crypto custody and digital asset services across Europe for years, with its digital arm, Openbank, beginning to offer crypto trading in Germany in September 2025, with plans to expand to Spain. This investment comes as institutional crypto adoption accelerates in Europe. Santander is actively involved in crypto custody initiatives across the continent and appears to be positioning itself to strengthen its role in the sector, especially as regulations like MiCA become clearer. The industry is watching whether the bank's medium integration level reflects caution or structural limitations, as banks with higher adoption may gain an edge in attracting crypto-interested wealthy clients.

cryptonews.ruHá 42m

Santander Bank Announces It Holds a $4.3 Million Position in U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs