Crypto’s Slide May Not Be Fear — It’s A US Liquidity Crunch, CEO Says

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-02Última atualização em 2026-02-02

Resumo

A sharp sell-off in crypto markets wiped out approximately $250 billion in value over the weekend, with Bitcoin falling below $80,000—down 40% from its 2025 high. Analysts note weakening retail interest, large ETF outflows, and a loss of momentum. Support around $73,000–$75,000 is now critical. According to Raoul Pal, CEO of Global Macro Investor, the decline is not crypto-specific but stems from a broader U.S. dollar liquidity crunch. Factors include Treasury General Account rebuilds, higher funding costs, and a reduced Reverse Repo Facility buffer. Pal stated that gold’s rally absorbed marginal liquidity that might have flowed into risk assets like Bitcoin and SaaS stocks, leaving the most exposed positions vulnerable. The nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair added uncertainty, with some fearing slower rate cuts. While markets remain fragile, some expect liquidity conditions to improve, potentially allowing a recovery if dollar flow normalizes.

A sharp hit to risk markets left crypto with heavy losses over the weekend. Reports say roughly $250 billion was wiped from combined market value as investors pulled back. Some of the selling hit Bitcoin hard. Others said it spread to tech stocks at the same time.

Bitcoin Faces A Confidence Test

Bitcoin has been searching for a base. As of today, it slipped below $80,000 and is down about 40% from the 2025 high above $126,000.

Traders and on-chain trackers show weaker buying pressure. Retail interest has cooled. Large outflows from spot ETFs have been recorded, and momentum has been lost across several indicators.

Support near $73,000–$75,000 is now the zone many are watching, while some market participants expect more stops to be run before calm returns.

BTCUSD now trading at $76,822. Chart: TradingView

Markets Are Moving Together

Analysts note that Software-as-a-Service stocks and Bitcoin fell in tandem. That matters because both depend a lot on hopes about future growth; they tend to be hurt first when money gets tight.

Gold was rising at the same time, and some traders argued that the move into bullion drew marginal cash away from riskier bets. When fewer dollars are freely moving between banks, hedge funds trim leverage fast and the riskiest positions suffer most.

Source: LSEG Datastream/Global Macro Investor

Macro Liquidity, Not A Crypto-Only Issue

According to Raoul Pal, founder and CEO of Global Macro Investor. the squeeze came from a narrower pool of US dollar liquidity rather than a problem unique to crypto.

The mechanics he points to are technical: Treasury General Account rebuilds, higher funding costs, and a smaller buffer in the Reverse Repo Facility that used to soak up extra cash.

“The rally in gold sucked all marginal liquidity out of the system that would have flowed into BTC and SaaS,” Pal said.

“There was not enough liquidity to support all these assets, so the riskiest got hit,” he added.

Those shifts can quietly remove liquidity even when no single headline screams crisis. Government funding hiccups were also blamed for adding friction to the system. When liquidity is chased away, assets tied to future cash flows get hit hard.

Source: LSEG Datastream/Global Macro Investor

Different Voices On The Fed Nomination

Reports say the nomination of Kevin Warsh to run the Federal Reserve has added to the nervous mood. Some market pros worry he won’t cut rates as quickly as hoped.

Some analysts said that sentiment swung on the idea that rate relief might be delayed. But Raoul Pal pushed back, arguing that US President Donald Trump’s team will steer policy toward easier rates and that Warsh will follow that playbook.

Views differ. That uncertainty has left many traders unwilling to put fresh money into stretched trades.

A Cautious But Not Despairing Close

At the time of writing, price action looks fragile and rallies have been short-lived. Yet some analysts expect the liquidity drain to ease and for capital to trickle back once funding conditions normalize.

The coming weeks will show whether buyers return around the low-$70k area or if selling finds a deeper level. Reports note that risk appetite often returns before headlines change, but only when dollars are flowing again.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason for the recent sharp decline in crypto markets according to Raoul Pal?

AThe main reason is a US dollar liquidity crunch, caused by factors like Treasury General Account rebuilds, higher funding costs, and a reduced buffer in the Reverse Repo Facility, rather than a problem unique to crypto.

QHow much has Bitcoin fallen from its 2025 high, and what is the key support level being watched?

ABitcoin has fallen about 40% from its 2025 high above $126,000. The key support level many are watching is near $73,000–$75,000.

QAccording to the article, what two asset classes fell in tandem, indicating a broader risk-off sentiment?

ASoftware-as-a-Service (SaaS) stocks and Bitcoin fell in tandem, as both are growth-dependent assets that are often the first to be sold when liquidity gets tight.

QWhat role did the rally in gold play in the market dynamics described?

AThe rally in gold sucked marginal liquidity out of the system that would have otherwise flowed into riskier assets like Bitcoin and SaaS stocks, exacerbating their decline.

QWhat event added to market nervousness regarding future Federal Reserve policy?

AThe nomination of Kevin Warsh to run the Federal Reserve added to the nervous mood, as some market professionals worry he will not cut interest rates as quickly as hoped.

Leituras Relacionadas

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbitHá 7m

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitHá 7m

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbitHá 14m

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbitHá 14m

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbitHá 23m

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbitHá 23m

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbitHá 25m

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbitHá 25m

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbitHá 28m

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbitHá 28m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片