Crypto.com and Changer.ae Sign MoU to Expand Regulated Digital Asset Services in UAE

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-07Última atualização em 2026-01-07

Resumo

Crypto.com and Changer.ae, a regulated virtual asset service provider under Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to expand regulated digital asset services in the UAE. The partnership aims to leverage Crypto.com’s global infrastructure and Changer’s FSRA-licensed platform to enhance access to secure and compliant digital asset offerings, including crypto-fiat conversions, custody solutions, and related use cases. This collaboration supports the UAE’s strategy to become a global hub for digital finance by combining innovation with strong regulatory oversight. Both companies emphasized the importance of responsible adoption of digital assets in line with the country's vision for a resilient digital economy.

A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Crypto.com and Changer.ae, a virtual asset service provider governed by Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), aims to increase access to regulated digital asset services in the UAE.

With a comprehensive legislative framework governing virtual assets, custody, and digital asset infrastructure, the agreement underlines the UAE’s ongoing efforts to establish itself as a worldwide center for digital finance.

The companies will investigate initiatives, such as integrating Crypto.com’s institutional solutions to facilitate and support liquidity for Changer’s cryptocurrency-fiat conversion services, as well as other regulated digital-asset custody and related use cases, provided they receive the necessary regulatory approvals.

The partnership seeks to promote the responsible adoption of digital assets by fusing Changer’s FSRA-licensed and ADGM-authorized platform, local market knowledge, and Crypto.com’s worldwide infrastructure and regulatory skills.

“This partnership aligns with the UAE’s broader strategy to foster innovation in financial services while maintaining strong regulatory oversight,” said Eric Anziani, President and Chief Operating Officer of Crypto.com. “As a global company it’s important for us to have strong local partners who support our endeavours to provide a best in class service to our users and accelerate the adoption of digital assets and that’s what we’re getting with Changer.ae.”

“The UAE has established itself as a jurisdiction where innovation and regulation move in parallel,” said Mr. Hao Wang, CFA, Senior Executive Officer of Changer “Through this collaboration with Crypto.com, we aim to broaden secure and compliant access to digital assets for users and businesses, in line with the country’s vision for a resilient and future-ready digital economy.”

“Expanding our reach in the UAE while supporting innovation in the digital assets industry is paramount to us,” said Alain Yacine, President of Middle East and Latin America of Crypto.com. “Changer has led the way in offering a regulated, secure and convenient wallet and custody solution for its users and we’re excited to see how our technology and services can not only enhance this offering but also look at other ways to boost the local crypto sector through our joint expertise.”

One of the most well-known virtual asset jurisdictions in the region is Abu Dhabi Global Market, which provides a thorough framework with an emphasis on institutional-grade standards, market integrity, and consumer protection.

Founded in 2016, Crypto.com is the industry leader in security, privacy, and regulatory compliance, with millions of users worldwide. It has a straightforward vision: Cryptocurrency in Every WalletTM. Crypto.com is dedicated to using innovation to hasten the adoption of cryptocurrencies.

The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) in Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) has granted Changer.ae a license as a regulated virtual asset service provider. Changer, which has its headquarters in ADGM, Abu Dhabi, provides safe and legal digital asset services to people, companies, and institutions in the United Arab Emirates. Visit https://changer.ae to find out more.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Crypto.com and Changer.ae?

AThe purpose of the MoU is to increase access to regulated digital asset services in the UAE by investigating initiatives such as integrating Crypto.com's institutional solutions to support liquidity for Changer's services and other regulated digital-asset custody use cases.

QWhich regulatory authority governs Changer.ae and granted it a license?

AChanger.ae is governed by the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) and is licensed by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) in ADGM.

QAccording to Eric Anziani, how does this partnership align with the UAE's strategy?

AEric Anziani stated that the partnership aligns with the UAE's broader strategy to foster innovation in financial services while maintaining strong regulatory oversight.

QWhat specific advantages does each company bring to this partnership?

AChanger.ae brings its FSRA-licensed platform and local market knowledge, while Crypto.com contributes its global infrastructure and regulatory expertise.

QWhat is the stated vision of Crypto.com as a company?

ACrypto.com's vision is 'Cryptocurrency in Every WalletTM' and it is dedicated to accelerating the adoption of cryptocurrencies through innovation.

Leituras Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 7m

marsbitHá 7m

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

Elon Musk is on the verge of becoming the world's first trillionaire, with a current estimated net worth of $970 billion. This wealth, largely tied to equity in SpaceX and Tesla, translates to him accumulating roughly $992 per second or $3.6 million per hour on average over his 31-year career. His fortune surpasses the annual GDP of over 125 countries and represents about 3% of U.S. GDP, double the relative wealth of historical figures like John D. Rockefeller. For perspective, an average U.S. household earning the median income would need to work over 11 million years to amass a comparable sum. Musk's wealth could buy approximately 2.4 million average American homes, all 32 NFL teams plus every NBA team, or over 10,000 private jets with operating costs. The analysis highlights the staggering scale and concentration of modern wealth, driven by successes in electric vehicles, space exploration, and artificial intelligence.

marsbitHá 10m

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

marsbitHá 10m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 14m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 14m

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Odaily星球日报Há 18m

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报Há 18m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHá 26m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHá 26m

Trading

Spot

Futuros