Crypto may enter insurers’ portfolios as Hong Kong reviews capital rules

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-22Última atualização em 2025-12-22

Resumo

The Hong Kong Insurance Authority is proposing to allow insurance companies to allocate capital to cryptocurrencies and infrastructure projects. Under the proposal, crypto investments would be subject to a 100% risk charge, requiring insurers to hold regulatory capital equal to the full value of their crypto holdings. The move is part of a broader review of the risk-based capital regime to support the industry and economic development. This follows a global trend, as the EU has proposed similar capital rules, and insurers like MassMutual and Allianz have already made crypto investments. Hong Kong has been actively developing its crypto regulatory framework, including stablecoin rules and a fintech strategy focused on tokenization, despite mainland China's continued restrictions on crypto activities.

The Hong Kong Insurance Authority is reportedly proposing to allow insurance capital allocation to cryptocurrencies and infrastructure projects.

Bloomberg reported on Monday that the city’s regulator started reviewing the risk-based capital regime to support the insurance industry and economic development.

Crypto allocations would be subject to a 100% risk charge, meaning that the insurer would need regulatory capital roughly equal to the full value of its crypto position.

The proposal would also allow infrastructure investment at a time when Hong Kong faces a budget deficit. Some companies that submitted feedback reportedly urged that coverage be extended broadly, noting that the current proposal has significant limitations.

A spokesperson reportedly explained that the institution is now gauging industry feedback and will initiate public consultation later.

The Hong Kong Insurance Authority did not respond to Cointelegraph’s media inquiry.

*Hong Kong Insurance Authority headquarters. Source:* *Ceeseven*, *CC BY-SA 4.0*

Related: China Merchants Bank tokenizes $3.8B fund on BNB Chain in Hong Kong

Insurance investment in crypto moves out of the fringe

Insurance companies investing in cryptocurrencies is increasingly becoming more popular. In March, the European Union’s insurance authority proposed a blanket rule that would require insurance companies to maintain capital equal to the value of their crypto holdings, similar to the reported Hong Kong rule.

Some insurance companies are also using cryptocurrency to achieve their goals.

In March, Barbados-based insurer Tabit raised $40 million in Bitcoin (BTC) to bolster its balance sheet and back traditional insurance policies.

Germany’s largest insurance company Allianz invested in a convertible note offering by leading Bitcoin treasury company Strategy in November last year.

Still, the earliest players moved much sooner.

At the end of 2020, Massachusetts-based insurance firm MassMutual purchased $100 million in Bitcoin for its general investment account. At the time, this was about 5,470 BTC for $18,279 per coin.

At the current price of over $89,000, that would be worth over $488 million.

Related: Hong Kong rules limit stablecoin derivatives trading: DBS CEO

Hong Kong takes crypto seriously

Hong Kong has been paying particular attention to the cryptocurrency industry recently. In November, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) unveiled its Fintech 2030 strategy. It includes real-world assets and tokenization, a rising crypto trend that is drawing global institutional interest.

Hong Kong started enforcing its stablecoin rules in August, reportedly drawing applicants from mainland China banks.

However, Beijing has not warmed up to crypto-related initiatives. Key activities related to crypto, such as mining and trading, are prohibited on the mainland.

In August, Chinese regulators reportedly told local firms to stop publishing research or holding seminars related to stablecoins. In September, a since-removed report by finance outlet Caixin claimed mainland Chinese firms operating in Hong Kong may be forced to withdraw from cryptocurrency-related activities.

Magazine: Sei wallets in Xiaomi, Bhutan’s gold on Solana: Asia Express

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Hong Kong Insurance Authority proposing regarding insurance capital allocation?

AThe Hong Kong Insurance Authority is proposing to allow insurance capital allocation to cryptocurrencies and infrastructure projects.

QWhat risk charge would crypto allocations be subject to under the proposed rules?

ACrypto allocations would be subject to a 100% risk charge, meaning insurers would need regulatory capital roughly equal to the full value of their crypto position.

QWhich other region has proposed a similar capital requirement for insurance companies' crypto holdings?

AThe European Union's insurance authority proposed a similar blanket rule in March that would require insurance companies to maintain capital equal to the value of their crypto holdings.

QWhat significant Bitcoin investment did MassMutual make in 2020 and what would it be worth today?

AIn 2020, MassMutual purchased $100 million in Bitcoin (about 5,470 BTC at $18,279 per coin). At current prices over $89,000, that would be worth over $488 million.

QHow does Beijing's stance on cryptocurrency differ from Hong Kong's approach?

ABeijing has not warmed up to crypto-related initiatives and prohibits key activities like mining and trading on the mainland, while Hong Kong has been paying particular attention to the cryptocurrency industry with various regulatory developments.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHá 5m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHá 5m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHá 20m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHá 20m

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHá 1h

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHá 1h

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHá 1h