Crypto May Be Loud Online, But Only 4% Of Voters Care: Poll

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-05-14Última atualização em 2026-05-14

Resumo

A Politico survey reveals a stark disconnect between crypto industry lobbying and U.S. voter priorities. While crypto groups have spent over $130 million on the 2024 elections, only 4% of voters say a candidate's position on crypto would influence their vote. Affordable housing, consumer fraud protection, and lower bank fees rank as far more important issues for voters. The poll also shows public ambivalence toward digital assets. Only 27% support government efforts to make crypto mainstream, while 31% oppose it. Over half of respondents have never traded crypto and don't plan to. Among those who have traded, 7% say a candidate's stance would sway their vote. Furthermore, 45% view crypto investing as a risk not worth taking. Despite low voter interest, Congress is advancing crypto regulation. The Senate Banking Committee is set to vote on a regulatory framework bill, a version of which already passed the House in June.

A separate poll released Friday by HarrisX found that 47% of registered voters said they would consider crossing party lines to support a candidate who backed crypto regulation legislation — a figure that stands in sharp contrast to new data showing crypto barely moves the needle for most Americans when they head to the polls.

The Lobbying Machine Behind The Legislation

The Politico survey, conducted by polling firm Public First and covering 2,035 US adults, found that only 4% of respondents would factor a candidate’s position on crypto into their voting decision.

Source: Politico

Affordable housing topped the list of issues voters want Congress to address, followed by consumer fraud protection and lower bank fees. Crypto regulation came in last.

That gap between voter priorities and industry muscle is hard to ignore. Crypto lobbies spent more than $130 million during the 2024 elections — more than any other industry — and have already committed $320 million to shape the upcoming November midterms, according to data compiled by researcher Molly White.

Survey results on public opinion regarding whether the US government should formally adopt crypto as a mainstream financial asset. Source: Politico.

In Illinois alone, crypto-aligned PACs have spent over $5.5 million opposing specific congressional candidates this year.

BTCUSD currently trading at $79,593. Chart: TradingView

Republican Representative Dusty Johnson acknowledged the disconnect. Most voters don’t think about digital assets, he told Politico, but those who do feel strongly about it. He described it as a high-intensity issue that is slowly growing in public awareness, even if the numbers remain small.

A Public Still Divided On Digital Assets

The survey also captured a broader wariness toward crypto among ordinary Americans. Only 27% said they support or strongly support the US government taking steps to make crypto a mainstream financial asset.

A slightly larger share — 31% — said they oppose or strongly oppose such a move. More than half of respondents said they had never traded crypto and had no plans to do so.

Image: Pexels

Among the 19% who had actually traded crypto, 7% said a candidate’s stance on the issue would influence their vote. The poll also found that 45% of respondents considered crypto investing a risk not worth taking, even with the promise of high returns. Only 25% disagreed.

Senate Moving On Crypto Regulation This Week

Meanwhile, Congress is pushing ahead. The Senate Banking Committee is set to vote on whether to advance a long-awaited bill that would establish a regulatory framework for the crypto industry.

A version of the bill — known as the Clarity Act — already cleared the House in June. Reports indicate the White House has been involved in negotiations between crypto interests and banking lobbies to shape the final version.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the poll, what percentage of voters would factor a candidate's position on crypto into their voting decision?

AAccording to the Politico survey, only 4% of respondents would factor a candidate's position on crypto into their voting decision.

QWhat issue topped the list of voter priorities that they want Congress to address, as revealed in the article?

AAffordable housing topped the list of issues voters want Congress to address, according to the survey.

QHow much money did crypto lobbies spend during the 2024 elections, and how does this compare to other industries according to the data cited?

ACrypto lobbies spent more than $130 million during the 2024 elections, which was more than any other industry.

QWhat percentage of survey respondents support the US government taking steps to make crypto a mainstream financial asset?

AOnly 27% of survey respondents said they support or strongly support the US government taking steps to make crypto a mainstream financial asset.

QWhat legislative action is the Senate Banking Committee set to take regarding crypto, as mentioned in the article?

AThe Senate Banking Committee is set to vote on whether to advance a long-awaited bill, known as the Clarity Act, which would establish a regulatory framework for the crypto industry.

Leituras Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 17m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHá 17m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 24m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 24m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHá 36m

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHá 36m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar 4

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de 4 (4) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar 4 (4) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu 4 (4)Depois de comprar o teu 4 (4), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona 4 (4)Transaciona facilmente 4 (4) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

616 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar 4

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de 4 (4) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片