Crypto Giants Battle Banks Over Stablecoin Reward Programs

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2025-12-20Última atualização em 2025-12-20

Resumo

A coalition of over 125 crypto companies is advocating for the protection of stablecoin reward programs amid opposition from traditional banks. The dispute centers on the GENIUS Act, which currently allows platforms—but not issuers—to offer rewards. Banking groups are pushing to extend restrictions to platforms, arguing that such programs carry risks similar to interest paid by issuers. The crypto industry, led by groups like the Blockchain Association, compares these rewards to credit card incentives and warns that limiting them would harm competition and innovation. They emphasize that stablecoin rewards offer significantly higher returns than traditional bank accounts, which yield minimal interest, and argue that restricting these programs would primarily benefit large banks at the expense of consumers and fintech firms.

Over 125 crypto companies have come together to form a coalition that aims to safeguard stablecoin reward programs from limitations that may be imposed by the traditional banking sector. This group of companies has written a letter to Congress advocating for their freedom to provide attractive returns to clients via digital assets.

The disagreement is about the GENIUS Act, which defines distinct roles for stablecoin issuers and the intermediaries that are the platforms, such as exchanges. According to this setting, issuers are not allowed to give interest in a direct way, but platforms still have the option to offer rewards to their users.

Banking Industry Challenges Stablecoin Platform Rewards

Tyler Winklevoss, Gemini co-founder, in a tweet, lambasted banks for reopening settled legislative matters by using regulatory pressure tactics. In his opinion, traditional financial institutions are crossing the line by questioning the established framework, which Congress has already approved.

Now banking groups are urging legislators to not only extend the limitations to issuers but also include platform, based rewards. According to them, these reward programs entail similar risks as the issuer, paid interest; however, the crypto coalition vehemently disagrees with this position.

The sector compares the situation to credit card rewards, which continue to function despite the fact that banks are not allowed to pay interest on deposits. This comparison demonstrates that intermediary platforms can provide advantages without raising the same regulatory issues as direct issuer payments.

The Blockchain Association led a coordinated campaign that attracted support from significant crypto exchanges like Gemini, Coinbase, and Kraken to the Senate Banking Committee leadership. According to the coalition, a restriction on platform incentives would “cut the heart out of competition” in the financial services market in the U. S. across the country.

The question of how ordinary people would be affected by such a move is still at the core of the argument. Traditional bank accounts hardly bring any returns as opposed to crypto ones. Average checking accounts give roughly 0.07%, while savings accounts offer about 0.40% yearly returns to depositors.

Stablecoin incentive schemes provide substantially more returns; thus, they become appealing alternatives for users looking for higher profits from their holdings. The crypto industry cautions that a limitation of such programs would be a transfer of benefits to big banks, with a subsequent disadvantage to small fintech firms.

While big banks aim to be the ones issuing stablecoins in the near future, the industry watchers are saying that the timing of the regulatory crackdown looks like a deliberate move. The group argues that keeping platform rewards is a key factor in ensuring the competitiveness of innovation in digital payment services.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Tezos Art Ecosystem Tops 500K NFT Sales in 2025 as Institutional Adoption Accelerates

Tagscrypto firmsStablecoin

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main goal of the coalition formed by over 125 crypto companies?

AThe coalition aims to safeguard stablecoin reward programs from limitations that may be imposed by the traditional banking sector and advocate for their ability to provide attractive returns to clients via digital assets.

QWhich specific legislation is at the center of the disagreement between crypto companies and banks?

AThe disagreement is about the GENIUS Act, which defines distinct roles for stablecoin issuers and intermediary platforms, prohibiting issuers from directly offering interest but allowing platforms to provide rewards.

QHow does the crypto industry compare stablecoin reward programs to traditional financial products?

AThe crypto industry compares stablecoin reward programs to credit card rewards, arguing that platforms can provide benefits without the same regulatory issues as direct issuer payments, similar to how credit card rewards function despite banks not being allowed to pay interest on deposits.

QWhat potential consequence does the crypto coalition warn about if platform rewards are restricted?

AThe crypto coalition warns that restricting platform rewards would 'cut the heart out of competition' in the U.S. financial services market, transferring benefits to big banks and disadvantaging small fintech firms.

QWhat significant difference in returns exists between traditional bank accounts and stablecoin incentive schemes?

ATraditional checking accounts offer approximately 0.07% annual returns and savings accounts about 0.40%, while stablecoin incentive schemes provide substantially higher returns, making them appealing alternatives for users seeking higher profits from their holdings.

Leituras Relacionadas

E Fund "Quits Drinking"

"Yi Fang Da 'Gives Up Alcohol'" - Summary The article analyzes the recent portfolio adjustments of star fund manager Zhang Kun, focusing on his flagship funds, the Yi Fang Da Blue Chip Select and Yi Fang Da Quality Select. The key trend highlighted is a significant and ongoing reduction in exposure to the consumer sector, particularly liquor (baijiu) stocks like Kweichow Moutai and Wuliangye, which were once core holdings. This shift is driven by several factors: a downturn in the consumer sector's business cycle post-pandemic, with slowing earnings growth for major players; a change in consumer behavior towards value over premium brands; and high channel inventory pressures, especially in the liquor industry. These fundamentals have led to a prolonged phase of valuation contraction for consumer stocks. Concurrently, market capital has rotated aggressively towards the high-growth technology sector, especially AI-related chains, which have dominated fund inflows. This style shift has further diminished the attractiveness of traditional consumer "core assets" for many funds. As a result, Zhang Kun's funds have drastically cut their consumer stock allocations. For example, the Blue Chip Select's baijiu holding proportion has fallen from over 40% to around 20%, and its overall top 10 holdings concentration dropped sharply. This mirrors a broader trend in the active equity fund industry, where allocations to consumer staples have plummeted to multi-year lows while technology holdings have surged. The article concludes that while the consumer sector's valuations are now at historical lows, offering some margin of safety, the fundamental outlook remains challenging due to weak macro consumption recovery and intense internal competition. Therefore, the sector is likely to see only sporadic rebounds rather than a sustained recovery, continuing to weigh on the performance of funds still heavily invested in it. Zhang Kun's timely reduction of Korean semiconductor holdings in his Asia Select fund amid a market crash is also noted as a contrast to his domestic strategy.

marsbitHá 10m

E Fund "Quits Drinking"

marsbitHá 10m

Before the Second Attempt at Hong Kong IPO, Topstar 'Hands Out' 548 Million in Related-Party Orders

Tosda, an industrial robotics firm, is making its second attempt at a Hong Kong listing shortly after its first application lapsed. The company has undergone a significant strategic shift, pivoting away from its lower-margin intelligent energy and environmental management system (IEEMS) business to focus on core robotics and machinery. This "revenue-reduction, profit-growth" strategy saw revenue nearly halve from 2022 to 2025, but resulted in a sharp turnaround to profitability, with a 1147% year-on-year increase in Q1 2026 net profit. This restructuring involved spinning off the IEEMS business, leading to a substantial jump in related-party transactions. Following the departure of a former executive, two newly associated companies are expected to handle up to 548 million RMB worth of IEEMS orders in 2026, with Tosda acting as a platform charging a 3% management fee. While profitability has improved, several financial concerns remain. Accounts receivable collection cycles have lengthened, inventory—particularly for robots—has surged significantly despite falling revenue, and the company faces challenges in overseas market expansion. Notably, overseas business currently has a lower gross margin than domestic operations. The company was also recently reprimanded by regulators for accounting inaccuracies related to revenue recognition and bad debt provisions. The success of its strategic pivot and its second listing attempt will depend on managing these financial risks, the transparency of its new business model, and the long-term performance of its core robotics segment.

marsbitHá 20m

Before the Second Attempt at Hong Kong IPO, Topstar 'Hands Out' 548 Million in Related-Party Orders

marsbitHá 20m

Is the AI Bull Market in Jeopardy? Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Breaks Below Key Support at 11,200 Points

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) faces a critical technical and fundamental test. It recently breached a key short-term support level around 11,200 points—a level that held in mid-July—and closed below it. Technical indicators have deteriorated, with the 21-day moving average crossing below the 50-day, signaling bearish momentum. Should the 11,200 support fail, the next major support is the 200-day moving average. The sell-off, which saw memory chip stocks like Micron and Western Digital plunge over 10%, stems from growing concerns about the cyclicality and quality of AI demand. Market participants question the sustainability of the AI capital expenditure boom, highlighted by divergences between the capital expenditures of mega-cap tech firms and semiconductor index performance. However, some positive structural shifts are emerging. Institutional positioning has normalized, unwinding the previously crowded "long semiconductors, short Mag 7" trade, leaving cleaner positioning. Seasonal tailwinds are also approaching, as the NDX historically performs well after this period, potentially supporting a rebound if retail inflows resume. The core question is whether the SOX can hold the 11,200 support. A failure could trigger further declines toward the 200-day moving average, while a successful defense, combined with lighter positioning and seasonal support, could offer a recovery window for the sector.

marsbitHá 20m

Is the AI Bull Market in Jeopardy? Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Breaks Below Key Support at 11,200 Points

marsbitHá 20m

Qualcomm and Arm Fall Together: The Bill for Memory Price Hikes Finally Arrives at Mobile Chip Companies

After posting Q2 FY2026 results, Qualcomm and Arm both saw their shares decline, reflecting the impact of memory price increases on the smartphone chip sector. Qualcomm's revenue of $9.95B slightly beat expectations, but EPS of $2.21 fell short. More concerning was its guidance for next quarter, with EPS projections below analyst estimates. The company directly attributed a >$1.50 per share annual EPS headwind to rising memory costs and supply constraints in Android phones, prompting planned price hikes. While automotive revenue grew 61% and is approaching one-third of phone revenue, the mobile segment declined 20%. Qualcomm also confirmed a significant reduction in its modem share for the upcoming iPhone and outlined a plan for data center revenue to replace all Apple-related income by FY2027. Arm's results surpassed expectations with revenue of $1.29B and EPS of $0.45, and its guidance was also strong. However, its stock fell. Key concerns included royalty revenue failing to set a new record and a downward revision to full-year royalty growth guidance from ~20% to the high-teens, citing weak smartphone demand and high memory prices. Despite robust growth in its data center business, Arm's premium valuation (over 100x forward P/E) means even beating expectations isn't enough to push the stock higher, as any sign of uncertainty is magnified. Ongoing global antitrust investigations add another risk factor. The situation highlights a broader shift. Memory price surges, which boosted Samsung's profits, are now pressuring chip designers. Meanwhile, the semiconductor sector saw significant corrections in July, with the hardest-hit stocks often being those with the biggest AI-driven gains year-to-date. Qualcomm, lacking such a premium, was an exception.

marsbitHá 36m

Qualcomm and Arm Fall Together: The Bill for Memory Price Hikes Finally Arrives at Mobile Chip Companies

marsbitHá 36m

Trading

Spot
活动图片