Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-23Última atualização em 2026-02-23

Resumo

Crypto investment funds have extended their net outflows to a five-week streak, totaling nearly $4 billion, with $288 million withdrawn in the latest week alone. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, including major ones like BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC, led the outflows, marking their longest withdrawal period since early 2025. Spot Ether ETFs also saw five consecutive weeks of outflows, though Solana and XRP products attracted minor inflows, indicating selective investor interest. Analysts attribute the trend to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical risks, and a broader shift away from volatile assets. Despite the outflows, total net inflows since the launch of U.S. Bitcoin ETFs remain above $50 billion, suggesting long-term allocation hasn't fully reversed.

Crypto investment funds continued to see withdrawals, extending five weeks of net outflows that have reached nearly $4 billion. According to the latest data from CoinShares, funds registered net outflows of $288 million last week alone. Market data indicate that institutional investors withdrew from crypto products, specifically spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have registered five consecutive weeks of net outflows, the longest period since early 2025.

Continued Outflows in Bitcoin and Ether Funds

The outflow pattern started in late January and has been ongoing through February, with some weeks seeing withdrawals of over $1.4 billion. In total, spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced a total outflow of around $3.8 billion in the five weeks. Analysts have noted that the continued outflows are happening in tandem with a slowdown in institutional interest in Bitcoin exposure through listed products. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity’s FBTC have been some of the largest contributors to the net outflows.

The Spot Ether ETFs have also seen five weeks of consecutive outflows. It appears that the rotation of funds is having a certain impact on the overall market for ETFs. It has been noted that Solana and XRP ETFs have seen small inflows of funds over the past period, suggesting a selective interest in other crypto indices. Despite the outflows, the total net inflows since the launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have been above $50 billion, indicating that long-term allocation has not fully reversed.

Institutional Sentiment and Market Context

There has been an increase in institutional wariness due to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical events, and the overall risk-off environment in financial markets. These factors have caused some allocators to reduce their exposure to more volatile crypto assets. Market analysts have pointed out that the current five weeks of consecutive outflows are one of the longest periods of negative flows since early 2025, when a similar trend occurred before a market-wide sell-off.

The price of Bitcoin has been ranging around important technical levels during this period, while the overall cryptocurrency market has been under pressure. The lower net inflows into ETFs have been accompanied by a lack of directional activity in some of the prominent digital currencies, thus supporting the conservative approach adopted by institutional participants.

Other factors that have been affecting the flows include the release of macroeconomic data and risk management approaches adopted by institutional desks responsible for managing digital asset allocations. The equity market volatility and the hardening of monetary expectations have also been affecting overall allocation patterns away from the risk assets of the crypto market. Despite the current redemptions, the total assets managed by the crypto ETFs are quite large.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Pi Network Introduces PiRC1 Token Framework for Mainnet Ecosystem

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTC)Bitcoin ETFCoinSharesCryptoEtherEther ETFETHEREUMEthereum ETFFunds

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the total amount of net outflows from crypto investment funds over the five-week period mentioned in the article?

AThe total net outflows from crypto investment funds over the five-week period reached nearly $4 billion, with spot Bitcoin ETFs alone experiencing outflows of around $3.8 billion.

QWhich specific type of investment product has seen five consecutive weeks of net outflows, marking the longest such period since early 2025?

AU.S.-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have registered five consecutive weeks of net outflows, the longest period since early 2025.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the key reasons cited for the increased institutional wariness and subsequent outflows?

AThe increased institutional wariness is due to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical events, and the overall risk-off environment in financial markets, which have caused allocators to reduce exposure to volatile crypto assets.

QDespite the recent outflows, what does the data indicate about the long-term allocation into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs since their launch?

ADespite the recent outflows, the total net inflows since the launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have been above $50 billion, indicating that long-term allocation has not fully reversed.

QWhich two cryptocurrencies' ETFs were mentioned as seeing small inflows, suggesting a selective interest from investors?

ASolana and XRP ETFs have seen small inflows of funds, suggesting a selective interest in other crypto indices.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinistHá 57m

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinistHá 57m

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbitHá 1h

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbitHá 1h

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbitHá 1h

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbitHá 1h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbitHá 2h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbitHá 2h

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbitHá 2h

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow