Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-05Última atualização em 2026-03-05

Resumo

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

TagsCrypto Bill

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

Leituras Relacionadas

The US Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

The White House has officially published a page titled "Lab Leak: The True Origin of COVID-19," stating that a laboratory leak in Wuhan is the most likely cause of the pandemic. This conclusion is based on a report by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. The page and the subcommittee's report, published on December 4, 2024, cite several arguments for the lab-leak theory: the virus possesses a biological feature not found in nature; all cases trace back to a single introduction into humans, unlike previous zoonotic pandemics; a leading coronavirus research lab in Wuhan was conducting gain-of-function research with insufficient biosafety; and WIV staff fell ill with COVID-like symptoms in autumn 2019, months before the official outbreak. The report also implicates the EcoHealth Alliance, led by Peter Daszak, for funneling U.S. taxpayer funds to support risky research in Wuhan and violating NIH grant terms. Following the investigation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has suspended and debarred EcoHealth Alliance and Daszak from federal funding for five years. The U.S. Department of Justice has also convened a grand jury to investigate the origins of COVID-19. The origin of COVID-19 remains debated within the scientific community, with many researchers and the WHO still considering natural zoonotic transmission a plausible hypothesis. The White House materials represent the findings of a Congressional investigation led by the Republican majority. The focus on the virus's origin occurs against the backdrop of a pandemic that caused an estimated 15 million deaths (2020-2021) and over $4 trillion in global economic damage, highlighting the geopolitical weight of the issue and the future need for stringent transnational biosafety protocols.

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

The US Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

He Made $40 Million from Trump Coin and Is in the Spotlight Again

The article focuses on an individual known as @kimchi1x, who allegedly earned $40 million from trading the Trump-themed meme coin $TRUMP. While the token created many wealth stories in the crypto space, kimchi recently gained widespread attention on X despite having previously only posted content showcasing a lavish lifestyle without discussing trading. His sudden fame sparked debate, with some users questioning the authenticity of his claimed profits due to a lack of verifiable on-chain data and accusations that his wealth displays might involve AI-generated images or borrowed items. A prior interview with well-known meme coin trader Orangie revealed that kimchi began trading meme coins in April 2024, achieved six-figure monthly profits by November, and spent long hours scanning blockchain activity. He reportedly set a goal to earn eight figures and, according to the narrative, achieved it with the rise of $TRUMP shortly after the interview in January 2025. The article reflects on the 2024-2025 meme coin frenzy as a period of "mass adoption," where platforms like pump.fun enabled rapid, attention-driven wealth generation for young, dedicated traders. It suggests that while the peak of purely hype-driven meme coins may have passed, and many like kimchi have withdrawn their profits, the speculative drive for life-changing gains persists among younger generations across various asset classes. The conclusion posits that new opportunities will continue to emerge.

marsbitHá 11m

He Made $40 Million from Trump Coin and Is in the Spotlight Again

marsbitHá 11m

Trading

Spot
活动图片