CoinQuant Introduces Trading Infrastructure for the Agent Economy

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-05-26Última atualização em 2026-05-26

Resumo

CoinQuant, an AI-powered no-code trading platform with over 15,000 users, is expanding its infrastructure to serve the emerging "agent economy." The company is introducing a unified trading intelligence architecture designed for both human traders and autonomous AI agents. This system acts as a trust layer, ensuring all trading strategies—whether human-created or AI-generated—undergo rigorous validation, backtesting, and risk analysis before live deployment. The core of the platform is an intelligence engine that combines institutional-grade backtesting, structured market data, AI optimization, and a proprietary Domain Expert system. Human traders interact via a natural language interface, while AI agents connect through APIs. Every validated strategy contributes to an anonymized aggregate intelligence layer. CoinQuant plans to launch an automated execution layer on HyperLiquid and is currently raising a $3 million Seed round to scale its product and infrastructure, including the development of HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture. The company aims to become the foundational intelligence backbone for algorithmic trading in the agent-driven financial era.

The agent economy is reshaping financial markets. Open-source agent frameworks are accelerating autonomous financial activity, with AI agents increasingly executing trades, managing portfolios, and interacting directly with exchanges. Yet the financial infrastructure supporting this shift has not evolved at the same pace.

CoinQuant, the AI-powered no-code trading platform that has attracted over 15,000 users since launch, today announces its expansion into a unified trading intelligence architecture built for both human traders and autonomous AI agents.

“Autonomous trading is no longer theoretical. It is already happening. The next phase requires structured validation, disciplined risk management, and intelligence infrastructure. That is what CoinQuant delivers,” said Maan Ftouni, Founder and CEO of CoinQuant.

The trust layer for autonomous AI agents

As AI agents increasingly connect directly to exchanges and wallets, many rely on raw APIs without structured backtesting, risk analysis, or validated data pipelines. CoinQuant introduces a structured intelligence layer between trading intent and live capital deployment.

No strategy goes live unvalidated, whether built by a human or generated autonomously. Backtesting, risk metrics, and parameter optimization are embedded directly into the workflow, ensuring capital is deployed only after systematic evaluation.

From no-code platform to trading intelligence architecture

CoinQuant’s expansion reflects the evolution of its core engine. At the center of the platform is a unified intelligence system combining institutional-grade backtesting, structured market data from providers including Kaiko and Financial Modeling Prep, AI-powered optimization, and CoinQuant’s proprietary Domain Expert system.

Human traders interact through a natural language interface that allows them to describe, test, optimize, and deploy strategies without writing code. AI agents connect programmatically through API and MCP integrations to validate strategies and access structured data at scale.

The interface is only the surface. The intelligence engine beneath it is the product.

One engine, two growth vectors

This expansion represents a natural extension of CoinQuant’s business model. The platform’s growing base of over 15,000 traders validates product-market fit and generates structured strategy intelligence. The agent interface multiplies that value through high-volume programmatic validation and automation workflows.

Every strategy built, tested, and deployed contributes to an anonymized aggregated intelligence layer, creating a proprietary dataset mapping trading intent to logic, validation metrics, and performance outcomes across market conditions.

“The same engine that powers a trader’s first backtest can validate hundreds of strategies for autonomous systems in parallel. We are building one intelligence foundation for both humans and AI agents,” Ftouni added.

Automation layer launching next

CoinQuant is preparing to launch its automated strategy execution layer on HyperLiquid as its second major revenue stream.

The automation layer will enable validated strategies to transition seamlessly from backtest to live deployment within the same intelligence framework.

Raising $3 million to scale

CoinQuant is currently raising a $3 million Seed round to support product development, infrastructure scaling, and global expansion. The company is also developing HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture designed for advanced research, risk modeling, and strategy optimization.

With over 15,000 users validating demand for structured trading intelligence, CoinQuant aims to become the intelligence backbone of algorithmic trading in the agent-driven financial era.

About CoinQuant

CoinQuant is an AI trading platform that enables traders and AI agents to build, validate, optimize, and automate trading strategies using natural language. Headquartered in Dubai, CoinQuant integrates with major exchanges and institutional data providers to deliver professional-grade trading infrastructure to a global community.

Websitehttps://coinquant.ai
Xhttps://x.com/CoinQuantX
Discordhttps://discord.gg/StNxg33z
Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/coinquant.ai/
TikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@coinquant.ai
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/coinquant

Media contact:

Nada Ali
[email protected]

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this Press Release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommends our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this Press Release.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core challenge that CoinQuant's new trading infrastructure aims to address for the agent economy?

AIt addresses the lag in financial infrastructure evolution, which has not kept pace with the rapid growth of autonomous AI agents in trading. It aims to provide structured validation, disciplined risk management, and intelligence infrastructure that are currently missing when AI agents connect directly to exchanges.

QWhat are the two primary user groups or growth vectors for CoinQuant's unified trading intelligence architecture?

AThe two primary user groups are human traders and autonomous AI agents. Human traders use the natural language interface, while AI agents connect programmatically via API and MCP integrations. Both groups utilize the same underlying intelligence engine.

QAccording to the article, what is the specific function of the intelligence layer CoinQuant introduces for autonomous AI agents?

AThe intelligence layer acts as a structured 'trust layer' between trading intent and live capital deployment. It enforces mandatory backtesting, risk analysis, and parameter optimization for all strategies—human or AI-generated—before they can go live, ensuring systematic evaluation.

QWhat are the two main components CoinQuant is developing or launching with the $3 million Seed funding, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two main components are: 1) The automated strategy execution layer launching next on HyperLiquid as a new revenue stream. 2) HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture designed for advanced research, risk modeling, and strategy optimization.

QHow does CoinQuant's platform benefit from the strategies created by its user base?

AEvery strategy built, tested, and deployed contributes to an anonymized, aggregated intelligence layer. This creates a proprietary dataset that maps trading intent to logic, validation metrics, and performance outcomes across market conditions, enhancing the platform's core intelligence foundation.

Leituras Relacionadas

PA Graphic | One Picture to Understand Major Web3 Events Worth Watching in June

June's crypto market is dominated by key macro events, token unlocks, and project developments. The major focus is on US economic data releases, including May's Nonfarm Payrolls and CPI figures, alongside the Federal Reserve's policy meeting and press conference. These will heavily influence market risk appetite. The European Central Bank and Bank of Japan will also announce interest rate decisions, keeping global liquidity and rate paths in focus. Significant token unlocks are scheduled for assets like SUI and ENA, posing potential market risks. Notable project updates include Coinbase launching its first perpetual stock index futures and CME Group planning a Nasdaq Crypto Index. SharpLink will be added to Russell indexes. Conversely, project consolidation continues, with services like the Bitcoin Ordinals browser Ord.io shutting down, requiring users to manage asset transfers. Other key events span technology and sports, such as the start of the World Cup, Apple's WWDC26, SpaceX's stock market debut, and Yushu Technology's IPO review. Overall, June's market direction will be shaped by evolving liquidity expectations, regulatory shifts, and ecosystem rotation amidst these converging events.

marsbitHá 1h

PA Graphic | One Picture to Understand Major Web3 Events Worth Watching in June

marsbitHá 1h

Alibaba 'Stocks Up', ByteDance 'Trains'

"In late May, two closely timed events in China's AI industry clearly revealed the divergent strategic approaches of two tech giants: Alibaba and ByteDance. Alibaba is aggressively integrating AI into its existing commercial ecosystem, prioritizing immediate monetization. Its Qwen App now fully integrates with Taobao, leveraging the platform's 4-billion-item database for AI-powered shopping features like virtual try-on and price comparison. Internally, Alibaba has reorganized to incentivize AI-driven business growth, notably through the 'Agentic Commerce Trust Protocol' to enable AI-agent transactions. Financially, it emphasizes ROI, with CEO Daniel Wu stating every AI chip purchased is generating revenue. Alibaba's strategy bets that foundational AI model capabilities won't be leapfrogged in the next five years, allowing its 'AI-as-a-utility' approach to succeed. In stark contrast, ByteDance's Seed division focuses on pushing the frontiers of AGI with a long-term, research-oriented mindset. Its video generation model, Seedance 2.0, topped international benchmarks. The division, led by researchers Wu Yonghui and product head Zhu Wenjia, is tasked with 'exploring the upper limits of intelligence,' even considering open-sourcing its models—a rare move among Chinese firms. ByteDance is investing heavily, with reports of its 2026 capital expenditure plan being nearly triple that of 2024, funded by its substantial private profits. This allows it to pursue projects like an 8-month research paper questioning if video models are true 'world models,' devoid of immediate commercial pressure. The core divergence is less about corporate philosophy and more about structural constraints. As a publicly traded company, Alibaba is bound to quarterly financial expectations, forcing a pragmatic, revenue-focused AI integration. As a private entity, ByteDance has the luxury to fund long-term, high-risk foundational research without answering to public markets. The article concludes that the true determinant of a Chinese company's AI path is its IPO status, suggesting that if ByteDance were public, or if Alibaba were private, their strategies might well be reversed."

marsbitHá 1h

marsbitHá 1h

Circle Blacklists Zama Protocol Address, Freezing $12.6M In User Funds – Details

Circle has blacklisted a smart contract address for the Zama protocol's Confidential USDC (cUSDC), freezing approximately $12.6 million in user funds. The action, identified by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, targeted a publicly documented contract on Ethereum. Investigations suggest the frozen funds may be indirectly connected to ongoing controversy and legal issues surrounding Overnight Finance, an asset-management protocol. A wallet linked to Overnight Finance had deposited a large sum into the Zama contract amidst governance disputes and allegations of a possible rug pull. This move by Circle, reportedly made without prior warning to Zama, has reignited criticism over transparency and unilateral enforcement by centralized stablecoin issuers. It highlights concerns about how external legal and governance risks can impact unrelated users in interconnected DeFi systems. Circle has not provided an official explanation for the freeze.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Circle Blacklists Zama Protocol Address, Freezing $12.6M In User Funds – Details

bitcoinistHá 1h

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

Editor's Note: As AI Agents become cheaper and easier to use, a new constraint emerges: the cost isn't in launching more Agents, but in the human attention required to manage, judge, and integrate their outputs. This hidden cost is called the "orchestration tax." The article argues that a developer's cognitive bandwidth is the key bottleneck—a serial, non-parallelizable resource akin to a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). While many Agents can run concurrently, their results ultimately require human judgment for review, conflict resolution, and final integration. Therefore, more Agents don't automatically mean higher productivity; they can simply create longer queues, lead to cognitive fatigue, and create the illusion of busyness without real output. The core solution is to design workflows around this scarce human attention. Key strategies include: scaling the number of Agents to match review capacity (not UI capacity), categorizing tasks (delegating independent ones, keeping complex judgment-heavy ones serial), batch reviewing results to minimize context-switching costs, automating verifiable checks to reserve human judgment for critical decisions, and protecting focused, uninterrupted thinking time. Ultimately, the critical skill is not launching many Agents, but architecting systems that respect the fundamental limit of human attention. Unpaid "orchestration tax" accumulates as both technical and cognitive debt, undermining system understanding and quality. True productivity comes from thoughtfully managing the single-threaded resource—your focus.

marsbitHá 2h

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

marsbitHá 2h

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbitHá 9h