Coinbase’s USDC Revenue Jumps as Stablecoin Debate Heats Up

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-24Última atualização em 2026-02-24

Resumo

Coinbase's stablecoin revenue, primarily from its USDC share with Circle, surged to $1.35 billion in 2025, accounting for 19% of its total revenue. This growth occurred despite a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025. USDC transaction volume reached $18.3 trillion last year, though Tether leads in market cap. The stablecoin sector's expansion has intensified regulatory debates, particularly around yield payments. The GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest, and proposed legislation may further restrict platforms like Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances, amid concerns over competition with traditional banks.

Bloomberg Intelligence reported that the stablecoin revenue of Coinbase associated with its USDC revenue share with Circle was 19% of overall revenue in 2025 and may surge two to sevenfold if USDC adoption in payments intensifies.

This comes regardless of witnessing a net loss of about $667 million in Q4 of 2025. As per the Q4 2025 shareholder letter of Coinbase, the firm earned about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

The figure was up from $911 million in its previous year, with $364 million in stablecoin revenue in just Q4 2025 solely, as interest income on USDC balances became a high-margin line for the exchange, contrasted with volatile trading fees.

The Significant Surge

Talking about stablecoins, they have also gone mainstream in usage terms. Overall stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $33 trillion in the last year, with USDC accounting for around $18.3 trillion of that, ahead of Tether’s USDT by transaction. However, Tether leads in market capitalisation.

The growth is the reason why the politics revolving around stablecoin yield have become so upset. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump last year, made a federal regime for payment stablecoins and specifically restricts issuers from paying interest or yield to holders.

That provision is supported by the banking lobby, as yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the traditional system. Banks and their associates now want to go further in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 of the Senate negotiations by shutting what they witness as a loophole that still permits non-issuer affiliates, like exchanges like Coinbase, to pass some of the interest on reserves back to customers as “rewards”.

Draft Senate language of the market structure bill could go beyond the yield restriction and stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with the stablecoin balances.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Step Finance and SolanaFloor Shut Down After Treasury Hack Drains Millions in SOL

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle?

A19% of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle.

QWhat was the total stablecoin revenue Coinbase reported for the year 2025?

ACoinbase reported earning about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

QWhich stablecoin had a higher transaction volume in the last year, USDC or USDT?

AUSDC had a higher transaction volume, accounting for around $18.3 trillion of the total $33 trillion, ahead of Tether's USDT.

QWhat is the name of the US law that restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders?

AThe law is called the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act.

QWhat potential new legislation could stop Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances?

AThe draft Senate language of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 could stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with stablecoin balances.

Leituras Relacionadas

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbitHá 3m

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitHá 3m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报Há 3m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报Há 3m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHá 53m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHá 53m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHá 1h

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHá 1h

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHá 1h