Coinbase is More Than Just a Crypto Stock; AI Payments Are Reshaping Its Valuation

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-08Última atualização em 2026-05-08

Resumo

Coinbase is often valued as a cyclical crypto brokerage tied to Bitcoin prices. However, this view overlooks its strategic position in two transformative trends: the rise of stablecoins and AI agent commerce. Key data shows that 92.8% of real AI agent payments occur on Coinbase's Base L2, with 99.8% settled in USDC, which Coinbase co-creates and distributes with a favorable revenue-sharing agreement with Circle. Analysts project stablecoin supply could reach $3 trillion by 2030, and AI agent commerce could hit $3-5 trillion. Coinbase is positioned to capture significant value from both. Through its four-layer stack—USDC (settlement asset), Base (settlement layer), CDP/AgentKit (developer infrastructure), and Agentic.Market (discovery layer)—Coinbase is becoming the foundational infrastructure for AI-native finance. The company's revenue from stablecoin reserves and AI agent payments could become substantial, diversifying it beyond exchange fees. The article argues this justifies a higher, infrastructure-like valuation, with a bull case for Coinbase becoming a $300 billion company by 2031.

Author:Artemis

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Insight: Wall Street treats Coinbase like a brokerage firm that follows Bitcoin's ups and downs, giving it a valuation half that of Circle. But data shows 92.8% of AI agent payments happen on Base, and 99.8% are settled with USDC—Coinbase has become the underlying infrastructure for AI-native finance, not just an exchange. If McKinsey's prediction of a $5 trillion AI agent commerce market by 2030 is even half realized, Coinbase's valuation logic will need a rewrite.

The Bull Case for Coinbase Becoming a $300 Billion Company by 2031

Core Argument: Most people view Coinbase as a crypto brokerage whose fortunes rise and fall with Bitcoin and crypto trading volumes. This narrow perspective overlooks Coinbase's long-term upside potential—in a world where stablecoin supply reaches $3 trillion and AI agent commerce hits $5 trillion by 2031, Coinbase, as the co-creator of USDC (with a favorable revenue-sharing agreement with Circle) and the creator of x402 and Base (the current primary venues for AI agent commerce), will capture immense value.

Introduction

Artemis is a digital finance research firm focused on on-chain data. We have helped McKinsey estimate real stablecoin payment volumes and have written extensively about AI agent commerce and the 2030 digital finance landscape. As crypto and AI converge, Coinbase will evolve beyond just a crypto exchange, becoming the settlement layer, distribution layer, and commerce layer for AI-native finance.

Most people view Coinbase as a cyclical crypto brokerage, moving in sync with crypto trading volumes.

Unsurprisingly, Coinbase's stock trend aligns with other brokerages like IBKR, Robinhood, and Schwab.

Circle, as a pure play on stablecoin growth, receives a much higher valuation multiple (103.9x NTM P/E).

Coinbase can become a $300 billion company by 2031 (a 6x increase from today, representing a 35% CAGR), emerging as a major winner in stablecoins and AI agent payments—not just a crypto exchange. See the full model here.

Our core assumptions:

  • Stablecoin supply reaches $3 trillion by 2031
  • AI agent commerce volume reaches $7.5 trillion by 2031
  • Our assumptions for the core exchange business align with the market—approximately $6 billion in trading revenue by 2028

The market is missing the fact that Coinbase benefits from and is positioned to win in two generational tailwinds:

1. The rise of stablecoins and global demand for digital dollars. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts stablecoin supply will reach $3 trillion by 2030 (a 10x increase from today). Bain & Company believes supply will grow 12x, or to $3.8 trillion, by 2030.

2. The rise of AI agent commerce. McKinsey predicts global AI agent commerce will be $3-5 trillion by 2030. We predict one-third of that commerce will be settled on-chain using AI agent payment protocols like x402 and MPP. We are currently seeing rapid growth in AI agent payments on-chain:

Coinbase clearly benefits from these two tailwinds, capturing value as the largest and most regulated distributor of USDC and as the network with the leading position in AI agent payments.

Coinbase will still win even if institutions are skeptical of DeFi and believe crypto is "dead"—not because of crypto and trading volume, but by becoming the most trusted and dominant stablecoin platform and AI agent payment infrastructure.

Why Coinbase Wins from Stablecoins

The market doesn't understand that Coinbase is a clear winner from stablecoin growth—even as crypto trading volumes decline, stablecoin usage has trended consistently upward historically.

The USDC distribution agreement is an asset for Coinbase, not Circle. The revenue share Circle pays to Coinbase has climbed from 32% in 2022 to roughly 50% over the past two years. The structural reason is straightforward: Coinbase earns close to 100% yield on USDC held in its products and gains a material share from off-platform balances under the Payment Base waterfall mechanism. As Coinbase's distribution scale grows (average USDC held in Coinbase products reached a record $17.8 billion in Q4 2025), its waterfall share grows accordingly.

From an investor perspective, the agreement resembles Coinbase outsourcing regulatory and reserve management work to Circle, rather than Circle paying Coinbase for distribution. The cooperation agreement is for 3-year terms with automatic renewal, contingent on meeting three thresholds (Product, Company, and Dealer). Public filings indicate, "the Circle agreement cannot be terminated" if these thresholds are met. The renewal mechanism is not a cliff for renegotiation—it's a locked-in continuation. For Circle, leaving would mean severing its single largest distribution channel for USDC. For Coinbase, the upside scenario (regulatory clarity driving stablecoin payments to scale, USDC market cap expanding significantly) would flow directly through the same contractual share. The structure of the contract is designed to solidify Coinbase's position regardless of who operates Circle.

USDC's Future Growth

Beyond Coinbase, we also see many interesting use cases for USDC, especially in emerging protocols. We've seen the growth of USDC supply in protocols like Polymarket, Hyperliquid, and MakerDAO increase substantially over the past two years. As new financial use cases emerge on blockchain platforms, we see USDC continuing to be used within these protocols.

Coinbase is well-positioned to capture the next wave of stablecoin use cases—payments. Payment types (B2B, B2C) on card rails have increased significantly over the past year, and USDC continues to gain share in these transactions.

Looking at USDC address-to-address transfers (a proxy for this type of transaction), we see USDC gaining share relative to USDT.

Is the Market Misreading the CLARITY Act?

The Digital Asset Market Certainty Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633), commonly referred to as the "CLARITY Act," passed the U.S. House of Representatives on July 17, 2025, by a bipartisan vote of 294-134. The bill would establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets other than payment stablecoins. For Coinbase, the CLARITY Act represents the most significant pending U.S. legislation in the company's regulatory environment, establishing a largely complete federal regulatory architecture for the digital asset ecosystem in which Coinbase operates.

The relevance of the CLARITY Act to Coinbase's stablecoin economics is also greater than commonly understood. The revenue streams generated from Coinbase's distribution and reserve share arrangement with Circle are, under current rate assumptions, comparable to Circle's own economics at the issuer level, and Coinbase's USDC rewards program contributes another line whose ultimate scale depends on the final drafting of the Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise. The market underappreciates the size and durability of these stablecoin-related revenue lines, viewing them as ancillary to the exchange business rather than core infrastructure economics in their own right. The CLARITY Act reinforces this argument by formalizing the broader regulatory architecture for stablecoin clearing, settlement, and circulation—and clarifying the registered intermediaries through which stablecoin institutional flows pass. It repositions Coinbase's stablecoin business as the application layer of a regulated and rapidly institutionalizing system, rather than a consumer product line whose value ebbs and flows with retail token trading volume.

Why Coinbase Wins in AI Agent Payments

Most investors view Stripe (valued at $159 billion as of February 2026) and Tempo as clear winners in AI agent commerce, but on-chain data suggests otherwise: 92.8% of real AI agent payment volume occurs on Base, and 99.8% is settled in USDC.

Of all AI agent payment volume, over 99.8% occurs on x402—the open payment protocol pioneered by Coinbase.

AI agents are evolving from assistants that answer questions to systems that transact on behalf of users, buying APIs, data endpoints, compute, inference, and services with sub-penny economics and at machine speeds.

Existing card rails aren't designed for this. A typical card transaction has fixed costs of ~$0.03 to $0.04 before interchange fees, making a $0.003 API call economically infeasible—off by two orders of magnitude. Stablecoins settled on high-throughput L2s clear in seconds for fractions of a penny and require no human intervention to establish a billing relationship.

McKinsey projects $3-5 trillion in global AI agent commerce sales by 2030. Gartner estimates AI agents will intermediate over $15 trillion in B2B procurement by 2028. Both numbers are directional and should be treated as such; however, what is not speculative is that if either materializes, it structurally favors stablecoin rails, and USDC is already the default choice, from which Coinbase benefits directly.

Data Scorecard

The x402 standard, an HTTP-native micropayments protocol co-developed by Coinbase (now managed by the Linux Foundation), has become the leading open protocol for payments initiated by AI agents. Since October 2025, x402 has processed over 180 million AI agent payments, moving $47.5 million in AI agent spend across over 5,000 merchants selling to AI agents.

When merchants make their services consumable by AI agents, Coinbase's L2 and USDC are already the default payment rail. Furthermore, Agentic.Market gives Coinbase a path to own resource discovery. If AI agents use it to find, evaluate, and route to x402-enabled services, value accrues not only through Base settlement and USDC volume but also through Coinbase's position as a marketplace coordinating AI agent-to-service transactions.

How Coinbase Monetizes

Coinbase captures the economics of AI agent payments through four compounding lines around its stablecoin pillar: USDC float, Base settlement, CDP/AgentKit monetization, and Agentic.Market distribution.

USDC Reserve Yield. The revenue line with Coinbase's highest upside potential is not trading fees, but float. AI agent wallets need prefunded balances to authorize autonomous spending, pay for APIs, cover usage-based services, and settle machine-to-machine commerce in real time. As AI agents become economic actors, USDC balances held in wallets under Coinbase's control become recurring, yield-generating deposits. Every dollar of USDC held by an AI agent generates reserve revenue, regardless of how fast that dollar turns over.

Base Sequencer Economics. Every x402 or MPP-style transaction settled on Base becomes a sequenced transaction that can generate priority fees. This line scales with the number of transactions, not just payment value, which is important because AI agent commerce may be higher-frequency and lower-ticket than human commerce. That said, sequencer fees are likely the smallest component of upside potential, as transaction costs trend lower over time.

CDP, AgentKit, and Enabler Monetization. Coinbase can monetize the developer layers that let AI agents hold wallets, manage permissions, sponsor gas, settle x402 payments, and interface with paid services. This includes enabler fees for x402 transactions, wallet infrastructure, gasless transactions, key management, policy controls, and enterprise-grade developer tooling. If the CDP becomes the default infrastructure stack for AI agent payments, Coinbase earns platform revenue even if end-payment values are low.

Scaled Upside Potential

We assume AI agent commerce reaches $5 trillion annually by 2030. Most of this will still be routed through card, ACH, bank payment, and account-to-account rails, especially for large consumer and enterprise purchases. But machine-native, high-frequency, cross-border, API-based commerce will disproportionately use stablecoins and payment standards like x402 and MPP.

In the bull case, roughly 20% of AI agent commerce settles over stablecoin rails, implying $1.0–1.5 trillion in annual stablecoin-based AI agent payment volume. An illustrative bull case revenue calculation is as follows:

  • USDC Float: $200 billion average AI agent USDC balance × 4% reserve yield × 50% Coinbase-attributable economics = $4 billion
  • CDP/AgentKit/Enabler/Agentic.Market: Developer subscriptions, wallet infrastructure, x402 enabling, marketplace routing, provider analytics, and distribution fees = $750 million
  • Base Sequencer: $250-300 billion in AI agent payment volume on Base, tens of billions of transactions, with low per-transaction economics = $250 million

This points to roughly $4.25 billion in annual Coinbase-attributable AI agent revenue. The important takeaway is that real value accrues if Coinbase becomes the operating account, developer platform, discovery layer, and settlement rail for autonomous commerce, and they have made significant progress on this front over the past few months.

Why Coinbase and USDC Win

Coinbase's advantage lies in its control over four mutually reinforcing layers of the AI agent payments stack: USDC float, Base settlement, CDP/AgentKit infrastructure, and Agentic.Market discovery.

USDC is already the default settlement asset, meaning builders integrate it first because it has the deepest tooling, liquidity, and developer support. Base then benefits as the natural settlement chain for USDC-native AI agent payments, with low developer friction and growing enabler coverage. The CDP and AgentKit sit a layer above, providing developers the wallets, key management, gas sponsorship, and payment infrastructure needed to make AI agents economically active. Finally, Agentic.Market can become the discovery and routing layer where AI agents find, compare, and consume x402-enabled services. Competitors entering this market need to replicate liquidity, settlement, developer infrastructure, and distribution simultaneously—and each new AI agent, merchant, and service makes the existing Coinbase stack harder to displace.

Conclusion

The market views Coinbase as a crypto exchange, missing the AI-native finance platform they are building. Global leaders predict $3 trillion in stablecoin supply and $5 trillion in AI agent commerce by 2030, and stablecoins have already decoupled from crypto prices. Coinbase has positioned itself to be a winner in that world and is showing early leadership. x402, USDC, and Base have become the de facto standard stack for AI agent commerce, with over 90% share across each layer versus competitors. Coinbase is uniquely positioned, having developed Base, incubated x402, and secured a favorable share of USDC economics. The mispricing has three legs. The Circle agreement structure is a perpetually locked contract, not a renewable one, meaning stablecoin revenue lines are durable, not at risk. The CLARITY Act formalizes the regulated infrastructure layer Coinbase already operates, repricing the business from a consumer product to core market plumbing. And the four-layer AI agent stack (USDC, Base, CDP, Agentic.Market) reflexively compounds, making the moat harder to attack with each new AI agent and merchant. Coinbase should trade closer to infrastructure comps than brokerage comps. We believe Coinbase will become a $300 billion company powered by these generational tailwinds, with the majority of revenue coming from subscription and service lines like stablecoins and AI agent commerce.

Disclosure: This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other form of recommendation. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be taken as advice to buy, sell, or hold any asset. The author or related entities may hold positions in the assets discussed. You should conduct your own research and consult appropriate financial professionals before making any investment decisions.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why does the author argue that Coinbase's valuation should not be viewed simply as a crypto stock?

AThe author argues that Wall Street values Coinbase as a cyclical crypto broker tied to Bitcoin's volatility, but this view overlooks its long-term potential. Coinbase is positioned as a foundational layer for AI-native finance, benefiting from two generational trends: the rise of stablecoins (as the primary distributor for USDC) and the emergence of AI agent commerce (with its Base L2 and x402 protocol handling over 92% of such payments). These subscription and service-based revenue streams, detached from pure crypto trading volumes, necessitate a revaluation of the company.

QWhat key data points does the article cite to demonstrate Coinbase's leading role in AI agent payments?

AThe article cites on-chain data showing that 92.8% of genuine AI agent payment volume occurs on Base (Coinbase's Layer 2), and 99.8% of that volume is settled using USDC. Furthermore, over 99.8% of all AI agent payment volume happens on the x402 protocol, an open payment standard co-created by Coinbase. Since October 2025, x402 has processed over 180 million AI agent payments across more than 5,000 merchants.

QWhat is the 'USDC Distribution Agreement,' and why is it considered a significant asset for Coinbase?

AThe USDC Distribution Agreement is a contract between Coinbase and Circle, the issuer of USDC. It structures the revenue sharing from USDC's reserve income. The article states that Coinbase's share of this income has climbed from 32% in 2022 to about 50% recently. The agreement is structured as a renewable 3-year lock, contingent on meeting certain thresholds, making it difficult for Circle to terminate without severing its largest distribution channel. This effectively gives Coinbase a durable and growing revenue stream from stablecoin adoption, independent of exchange trading volumes.

QHow does the article suggest Coinbase monetizes the AI agent commerce opportunity?

AThe article outlines four primary monetization layers for Coinbase in AI agent commerce: 1) **USDC Reserve Yield**: Revenue from the yield generated on USDC balances held in AI agent wallets. 2) **Base Sequencer Economics**: Fees from transactions settled on the Base network. 3) **CDP/AgentKit & Enabler Monetization**: Revenue from developer tools, wallet infrastructure, gas sponsorship, and facilitation fees for services like x402 transactions. 4) **Agentic.Market Distribution**: Potential revenue from a marketplace that helps AI agents discover and route to x402-enabled services.

QWhat is the author's bullish long-term price target and core assumptions for Coinbase by 2031?

AThe author's bullish case projects Coinbase becoming a $300 billion company by 2031, representing a 6x increase from the article's time with a 35% CAGR. The core assumptions underpinning this model are: 1) Stablecoin supply reaching $3 trillion. 2) AI agent commerce volume reaching $7.5 trillion. 3) Coinbase's core exchange business generating about $6 billion in trading revenue by 2028. The valuation logic hinges on Coinbase capturing significant value from these two mega-trends as a stablecoin platform and AI agent payment infrastructure provider, not just as an exchange.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHá 15h

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHá 15h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHá 15h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHá 15h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHá 16h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHá 16h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHá 16h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHá 16h

Trading

Spot
活动图片