Coinbase CPO Lists 5 Critical Errors US Congress Should Avoid In Stablecoin Regulation

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-11Última atualização em 2026-03-11

Resumo

Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad outlines five key mistakes US Congress should avoid in stablecoin regulation. He warns against undermining bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, which aims to strengthen the US dollar, boost demand for Treasuries, and keep digital innovation onshore. Shirzad cautions against favoring traditional banks with unverified claims about deposit flight risks, as stablecoins benefit consumers and banks alike. He also emphasizes the need for precise regulatory authority to prevent future misuse and avoid disrupting existing lawful business partnerships. Finally, he urges Congress to consider the voices of millions of crypto investors, not just bank lobbyists, and to enact clear rules that foster innovation in the US rather than driving it abroad.

After the country’s first stablecoin bill (the GENIUS Act) passed last year, the proposed crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, faced significant delays in the US Congress, particularly due to growing opposition from the traditional banking sector.

In this climate, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, has outlined five critical recommendations on what Congress should avoid when it comes to regulating stablecoins.

Coinbase CPO Urges Congress Not To Favor Banks

First, Shirzad cautioned against undermining the bipartisan goals established in the country’s stablecoin legislation, which was signed into law last year by President Donald Trump.

He stated that the GENIUS Act aims to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States, rather than allowing this innovation to migrate to other countries, such as China.

Coinbase’s CPO said that any amendments to the rewards framework should reinforce these goals, not diminish them.

Shirzad also highlighted the importance of consumer interests, warning against legislative measures that might extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims regarding deposit flight risks.

He noted that stablecoins are designed to make transactions faster and more affordable, with banks themselves being among the foremost adopters.

Revisiting settled laws to favor banks and potentially hamper non-bank platforms would represent poor public policy, especially if rooted in unreliable premises, Shirzad claimed.

Potential Pitfalls For Stablecoins

The Coinbase official also emphasized the need for precise regulatory authority, advising Congress not to introduce vague enforcement powers that could be misused in the future.

Ambiguous regulations could allow succeeding administrations to undermine Congress’s original intent, which could inadvertently lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the space. Therefore, Shirzad urged lawmakers to establish clear statutory guidelines that provide firm boundaries for any regulations.

Another critical point raised by Shirzad pertains to the need for legislation that does not disrupt existing lawful businesses. He claimed that the stablecoin ecosystem currently involves partnerships among issuers, platforms, and technology providers.

Coinbase’s CPO further claimed that any new legislation should set guidelines for the future rather than retroactively invalidate legitimate commercial agreements or target specific companies.

Finally, Shirzad called for Congress to listen to the voices of voters. While bank executives hold considerable political sway in Washington, he stated that ‘tens of millions of Americans” are invested in cryptocurrencies, and their opinions should carry equal weight. The Coinbase executive concluded:

Stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, and modernize payments. They’re also going to be a big commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes. Congress should focus on clear rules that allow innovation to grow in America — not policies that push it offshore.

The daily chart shows Coinbase’s stock, COIN, inching closer to $200 on Tuesday’s trading session. Source: COIN on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the five critical recommendations that Coinbase's CPO outlined for Congress regarding stablecoin regulation?

AThe five recommendations are: 1) Not to undermine the bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, 2) Avoid legislative measures that extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims, 3) Not to introduce vague enforcement powers, 4) Ensure legislation does not disrupt existing lawful businesses, and 5) Listen to the voices of voters invested in crypto.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary purpose of the GENIUS Act as stated by Faryar Shirzad?

AThe primary purpose of the GENIUS Act is to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States to prevent this innovation from migrating to other countries.

QWhy does Shirzad warn against introducing vague enforcement powers in stablecoin regulation?

AHe warns that ambiguous regulations could allow future administrations to misuse these powers, undermine Congress's original intent, and potentially lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the crypto space.

QWhat potential negative outcome does Shirzad associate with legislation that favors traditional banks over non-bank platforms?

AHe claims that revisiting settled laws to favor banks would represent poor public policy, as it could hamper non-bank platforms and be based on unreliable premises like unverified claims of deposit flight risks.

QWhat key benefits of stablecoins does the Coinbase executive highlight in his concluding statement?

AHe states that stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, modernize payments, and represent a significant commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbitHá 3h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbitHá 3h

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbitHá 3h

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片