China Steps Up Crypto Crackdown, Blocks Domestic And Overseas Issuers

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-07Última atualização em 2026-02-07

Resumo

China has intensified its crackdown on the cryptocurrency sector, reinforcing its ban on virtual currencies while imposing stricter oversight on offshore token issuance linked to Chinese assets. The People’s Bank of China, along with other regulators, prohibited domestic firms and their overseas affiliates from issuing cryptocurrencies abroad without approval. The move specifically targets unauthorized offshore yuan-pegged stablecoins, emphasizing that the digital yuan remains the only state-backed digital currency. While the ban on cryptocurrencies remains, the new guidelines introduce regulatory clarity for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, signaling a milestone for the RWA sector. Authorities expressed concerns over speculative risks and reiterated that virtual currencies lack legal status equivalent to fiat money.

China has signaled a renewed and more forceful push to tighten its grip on the cryptocurrency sector, reaffirming its long‐standing ban on virtual currencies while introducing stricter oversight of offshore token issuance tied to Chinese assets.

According to a Reuters report, Chinese authorities said they will closely scrutinize the offshore issuance of tokens backed by assets located onshore and have explicitly banned the unauthorized issuance of yuan‐pegged stablecoins outside the country.

China Tightens Crypto Controls

In a notice published on the People’s Bank of China’s website, regulators said domestic companies and overseas entities under their control are prohibited from issuing virtual currencies abroad without official approval.

The move effectively shuts the door on privately issued offshore yuan stablecoins, reinforcing Beijing’s position that cryptocurrencies cannot function as money within China’s financial system.

The announcement largely restates China’s existing prohibition on cryptocurrencies, but it also introduces new clarity around emerging areas of digital finance. Notably, some market participants see the language as a sign that China is laying the groundwork for regulating real‐world asset (RWA) tokenization.

Louis Wan, chief executive of Unified Labs, described the distinction made by regulators as a significant development. He said the key change lies in the clear separation between virtual currencies and RWA tokenization.

While cryptocurrencies remain banned, RWA activity is now being brought into the regulatory system. For China’s RWA sector, he called the move a milestone.

Crackdown On Private Stablecoins

China’s central bank also emphasized its control over digital currency issuance, underscoring that the digital yuan is the only legitimate form of state‐backed digital money.

Winston Ma, an adjunct professor at NYU School of Law, said the message from regulators is that there will be no tolerance for a mix of private yuan‐based stablecoins circulating on global crypto exchanges.

Officials said the tougher stance reflects concerns that recent speculative activity in virtual currencies has created “new risks” that require additional regulatory measures.

In a joint statement issued by the People’s Bank of China along with seven other government agencies, authorities reiterated that virtual currencies do not carry the same legal standing as traditional fiat money.

Regulators also warned that, without explicit approval, neither domestic firms nor their overseas affiliates are allowed to issue cryptocurrencies abroad. Both Chinese and foreign entities were barred from issuing offshore stablecoins linked to the yuan unless authorized.

Authorities noted that stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies can effectively perform some of the same functions as money in circulation, making them a particular focus of regulatory scrutiny.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap’s recovery toward $2.4 trillion on Friday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of China's latest cryptocurrency crackdown according to the article?

AChina is tightening its grip on the cryptocurrency sector by reaffirming its ban on virtual currencies and introducing stricter oversight of offshore token issuance tied to Chinese assets, particularly targeting unauthorized yuan-pegged stablecoins.

QWhich specific type of digital currency does the People's Bank of China emphasize as the only legitimate state-backed form?

AThe People's Bank of China emphasizes that the digital yuan is the only legitimate form of state-backed digital money.

QAccording to Louis Wan, what significant regulatory distinction is being made in this new push?

ALouis Wan stated that the key development is the clear regulatory separation between banned virtual currencies and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, which is now being brought into the regulatory system.

QWhat reason did officials give for the need for additional regulatory measures?

AOfficials stated that the tougher stance reflects concerns that recent speculative activity in virtual currencies has created 'new risks' that require additional regulatory measures.

QWhat are domestic and overseas entities explicitly prohibited from doing without official approval?

AWithout explicit approval, domestic companies and their overseas affiliates are prohibited from issuing virtual currencies or yuan-linked stablecoins abroad.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbitHá 46m

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbitHá 46m

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手Há 50m

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手Há 50m

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbitHá 53m

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbitHá 53m

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbitHá 57m

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbitHá 57m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PUSH

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Push Protocol (PUSH) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Push Protocol (PUSH)Depois de comprar o teu Push Protocol (PUSH), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Push Protocol (PUSH)Transaciona facilmente Push Protocol (PUSH) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

524 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PUSH

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PUSH (PUSH) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片