China adds eight banks to digital yuan operator list, bringing total to 30

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-17Última atualização em 2026-08-17

Resumo

China's central bank has added eight more banks to the digital yuan ecosystem, bringing the total number of authorized operators to 30. The new participants include Ping An Bank, Hengfeng Bank, and Bank of Shanghai, among others. This expansion aims to broaden public access to the central bank digital currency (CBDC) and meet demand for secure, convenient payments, with plans to add more operators to foster competition. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has set the stable development of the digital yuan as a key goal in its 2026-2030 reform plan. Transaction volume reached 16.7 trillion yuan (approx. $2.3 trillion USD) by the end of 2025, involving 3.48 billion transactions and about 230 million personal wallets. Despite this scale, dominant mobile payment platforms Alipay and WeChat Pay still control over 90% of China's third-party mobile payment market. Digital yuan usage is often facilitated by government initiatives rather than being a primary consumer choice. Concurrently, China is preparing the digital yuan for cross-border use. The PBOC-controlled CBETS platform for digital yuan cross-border settlements onboarded its first 26 direct participants in June, including Standard Chartered Bank (China) and overseas branches of Chinese banks in countries like Thailand and Singapore.

China’s central bank has approved eight more financial institutions to launch digital yuan services. Beijing aims to make the currency available for daily and cross-border use.

With the addition of these banks, the number of authorized digital yuan operators has increased to 30.

Which banks can offer digital yuan services?

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced, that Ping An Bank, Hengfeng Bank, Bohai Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Hangzhou, Huishang Bank, Bank of Changsha, and Guangxi Beibu Gulf Bank will connect to the digital yuan system and begin providing their services after completing technical and operational setup.

During the last expansion phase, 12 banks were added to the list, including China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, and Huaxia Bank. Prior to that phase, only 10 institutions were approved as operators. Six of them were state-owned commercial banks, while the remaining four consisted of two joint-stock banks and two internet banks.

The central bank stated that adding more operators will help more people access e-CNY services and meet public demand for safe and simple payments. It also plans to continue expanding the list of operators to stimulate competition.

Cryptopolitan reported that the People’s Bank of China included the stable development of the digital yuan among its key tasks in the 2026–2030 reform plan, published on August 10.

What is the electronic Chinese yuan used for?

The People’s Bank of China reported that the cumulative transaction volume in e-CNY by the end of 2025 reached 16.7 trillion yuan (US$2.3 trillion), distributed across approximately 3.48 billion transactions and about 230 million personal wallets.

However, Alipay and WeChat Pay still control over 90% of third-party mobile payments in China. The use of e-CNY often occurs inconspicuously or is driven by government initiatives, rather than being consumers' free choice over the existing mobile payment giants.

Nevertheless, the central bank is also preparing the e-CNY for use in international payments. The CBETS platform, which provides cross-border remittance services in e-CNY and is managed by a Shanghai-based company under the control of the PBOC, attracted its first 26 direct participants in June. These include Standard Chartered Bank (China) and overseas branches of Chinese banks in Thailand, Singapore, Laos, Qatar, and other countries.

Perguntas relacionadas

QHow many banks have been added to China's digital yuan operator list, and what is the new total number of authorized operators?

AEight banks have been added, increasing the total number of authorized digital yuan operators to 30.

QWhat is the stated purpose of the People's Bank of China (PBoC) for expanding the number of digital yuan operators?

AThe PBoC aims to help more people access e-CNY services, meet public demand for secure and simple payments, and promote competition by continuing to expand the list of operators.

QWhat was the cumulative transaction value of the e-CNY by the end of 2025 according to the PBoC?

AThe cumulative transaction value of the e-CNY reached 16.7 trillion yuan (approximately 2.3 trillion USD) by the end of 2025.

QDespite the growth of the e-CNY, which platforms still dominate China's third-party mobile payment market?

AAlipay and WeChat Pay still control over 90% of the third-party mobile payment market in China.

QWhat is the CBETS platform mentioned in the article, and what was a recent development for it?

AThe CBETS platform is a service providing cross-border transfer services in e-CNY, managed by a Shanghai company under PBoC oversight. In June, it attracted its first 26 direct participants, including Standard Chartered Bank (China) and overseas branches of Chinese banks in countries like Thailand and Singapore.

Leituras Relacionadas

Tiger Research: How Far Can the On-Chain Foreign Exchange Settlement Layer Go?

"Tiger Research: How Far Can On-Chain FX Settlement Layers Go?" The article examines KiiChain, a startup aiming to create an on-chain foreign exchange settlement layer, focusing on its potential to address inefficiencies in cross-border payments, especially for emerging markets. The core problem is the slow, costly, and fragmented traditional FX infrastructure, where bank hours, regulations, and thin liquidity for local currencies create delays. KiiChain, founded by OTC veterans, proposes aggregating USD and local currency stablecoin liquidity on one chain to enable 24/7 settlement. The platform consists of four components: 1) The KiiChain App uses an Atomic Quote Network (RFQ-style price discovery with on-chain settlement) to tackle settlement delays, but not underlying liquidity scarcity. 2) The RWA Protocol tokenizes collateral using compliant standards (like ERC-3643), shifting trust from bank relationships to coded rules, though regulatory anchors remain. 3) Kii Oracle uses a decentralized validator network to create consensus pricing from fragmented data, improving transparency but not market depth. 4) KiiChain Pay bundles fiat on/off-ramps and swap services; only the DEX swap bypasses banking bottlenecks, while others still rely on licensed operators. The analysis concludes KiiChain doesn't eliminate intermediaries but creates a unified settlement layer where they can interact without geographic or time constraints. It streamlines the process—three of eight traditional steps are removed—by moving infrastructure on-chain, improving speed and accessibility for digital asset swaps. However, fiat entry/exit points remain subject to off-chain service limitations. Current metrics show over $500M in transaction volume. The future depends on ecosystem growth—attracting liquidity partners and users—to evolve beyond settlement into a broader financial hub. Ultimately, the on-chain structure currently solves settlement friction and time, not liquidity depth. Success will be determined by execution in building partnerships and market presence, not by architectural design alone.

marsbitHá 10m

Tiger Research: How Far Can the On-Chain Foreign Exchange Settlement Layer Go?

marsbitHá 10m

'The Idea of Catching the Absolute Bottom Is Wrong': Experts on a New Phase of Bitcoin Capitulation

Analysts from CryptoQuant advise investors against trying to pinpoint the exact bottom of Bitcoin's price. Their data shows the percentage of the Bitcoin supply in profit has fallen to 51.4%, a level historically associated with capitulation phases followed by accumulation. This means approximately 48.6% of circulating coins are held at an unrealized loss. The metric, based on UTXO analysis comparing a coin's last moved price to its current market value, last neared this level in early 2023 when Bitcoin traded between $16,000 and $20,000. CryptoQuant states that the idea of catching the "absolute bottom" is flawed. The decline in the average cost basis during a bear market reflects coins transferring from weak hands to stronger, long-term holders. While some investors realize losses, others may use the decline for gradual accumulation. The accumulation window may last longer than many expect, even as fear drives some participants away. Historically, a supply in profit below 55% has been linked to re-accumulation periods. Separately, Swan Bitcoin CEO Cory Klippsten offered a forecast, suggesting Bitcoin could form a bottom in October 2026, followed by a recovery towards approximately $130,000 ahead of the 2028 halving. This aligns with the historical pattern of local lows forming about 12 months after bull market peaks; Bitcoin hit its all-time high above $126,000 in early October 2025. However, Klippsten cautioned against over-relying on past cycles due to limited historical data.

cryptonews.ruHá 53m

'The Idea of Catching the Absolute Bottom Is Wrong': Experts on a New Phase of Bitcoin Capitulation

cryptonews.ruHá 53m

How Does FalconX Bring Institutional Lending On-Chain? Deep Dive into the FALX Operational Mechanism

FALX is a structured credit facility that brings institutional prime brokerage loans on-chain as fixed-income assets. It works by having FalconX originate overcollateralized loans to institutional clients (e.g., quant funds, market makers). These loan exposures enter a bankruptcy-remote SPV. The Pareto protocol provides the on-chain credit vault infrastructure, while M11 Credit acts as the credit curator, administrative agent, and collateral agent. Platforms like Plume, Ethereum, and Solana serve as distribution channels for investors. Investors deposit USDC into the vault, receiving an estimated ~7.4% net yield (after a 10% performance fee). This yield represents a premium over low-risk on-chain alternatives (like tokenized Treasuries at ~4%) to compensate for risks including FalconX operational risk, collateral liquidation risk, SPV legal risk, M11's execution risk, a 31-day redemption notice period, and potential contagion from DeFi re-collateralization. The structure incorporates multiple risk mitigations: overcollateralized underlying loans, a first-loss capital contribution from FalconX, and independent oversight by M11. However, challenges remain, such as scaling investor demand (current AUM is ~$148M against a ~$1B potential capacity), managing redemption liquidity, and addressing new risks from the vault token's use as collateral in DeFi lending protocols like Morpho. FALX demonstrates a pragmatic path for on-chain credit by leveraging existing institutional loan origination and combining it with legal structures, external curation, and blockchain-based distribution.

marsbitHá 54m

How Does FalconX Bring Institutional Lending On-Chain? Deep Dive into the FALX Operational Mechanism

marsbitHá 54m

Trading

Spot
活动图片