CFTC Expands Advisory Team With Top Coinbase, Ripple Figures

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-13Última atualização em 2026-02-13

Resumo

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed a 35-member Innovation Advisory Committee, including prominent crypto industry leaders such as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. The committee aims to provide the CFTC with up-to-date industry perspectives on derivatives, market structure, and token classification. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated that the group will help align the agency’s decisions with real market conditions and support the development of clear regulatory guidelines. The committee comprises a diverse mix of crypto executives, DeFi founders, and traditional finance representatives. While the move is seen as a way to improve policy feedback and create workable regulations, some observers caution about potential conflicts of interest. The committee will soon begin meetings focusing on custody, tokenization, derivatives oversight, and market data.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) moved this week to build a new bridge with the crypto industry, naming a 35-member Innovation Advisory Committee that includes top exchange and blockchain leaders.

Reports say the roster gives industry executives a formal line into policy talks, and it lists a mix of crypto founders, exchange bosses and traditional market players.

CFTC Execs Granted A Seat At The Table

Among those tapped are Coinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong and Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse, whose firms have been central to recent debates over how digital assets should be regulated in the US.

The committee’s purpose is to give the regulator up-to-date industry perspective as it considers rules for derivatives, market structure, token classification and other technical issues.

CFTC Chair Mike Selig said Thursday that the committee’s 35 members will help “align the CFTC’s decisions with real market conditions” and allow the commission to “establish clear guidelines for what he called the Golden Age of American Financial Markets.”

What The Roster Looks Like

The membership list reads like a cross-section of the market: centralized exchanges, DeFi founders, trading-venue operators and a handful of established financial firms.

Some reporting highlights that around 20 members have direct ties to crypto firms, while others represent legacy market infrastructure, which creates a mix of viewpoints the commission can tap when drafting guidance or vetting ideas.

Why Industry Leaders Joined

Reports note executives accepted the roles for different reasons. For some, it is an opportunity to press for clearer rules. For others, it may be a way to protect business models as regulators decide which activities fall under commodity rules and which fall under securities laws.

The move follows a period of public lobbying and high-profile disputes over jurisdiction that have left firms searching for predictability.

BTCUSD trading at $66,906 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Voices And Risks

Giving industry a formal advisory channel can shorten feedback loops. But it also raises questions about how the regulator will manage conflicts and preserve impartiality.

Some observers say close engagement may help craft workable policy that recognizes market realities.

Others warn that heavy industry presence could shape rules in ways that favor incumbents over smaller innovators or the public interest.

Reports say the commission will have to balance open input with careful governance.

What Comes Next

The committee will begin meeting in the coming weeks, and the public will be watching for the topics it raises and the recommendations it produces.

Meetings are likely to focus on custody rules, how tokenized assets are classified, oversight of derivatives, and the handling of market data.

Whether those talks lead to concrete rule proposals will show if this new advisory setup truly shifts how digital asset policy is shaped in the US.

Featured image from V-graphix | Istock | Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the purpose of the CFTC's newly formed Innovation Advisory Committee?

AThe committee's purpose is to give the CFTC up-to-date industry perspective as it considers rules for derivatives, market structure, token classification, and other technical issues, helping to align the regulator's decisions with real market conditions.

QWhich two prominent crypto industry CEOs were named to the committee?

ACoinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong and Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse were named to the committee.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the potential risks of giving the industry a formal advisory role?

AThe risks include potential conflicts of interest and questions about how the regulator will preserve impartiality, with concerns that heavy industry presence could shape rules in ways that favor incumbents over smaller innovators or the public interest.

QWhat are some of the topics the new committee is likely to focus on in its meetings?

AMeetings are likely to focus on custody rules, how tokenized assets are classified, oversight of derivatives, and the handling of market data.

QHow many members are on the new advisory committee, and what is the composition of its membership?

AThe committee has 35 members, which includes a mix of crypto founders, exchange bosses, and traditional market players. Reports highlight that around 20 members have direct ties to crypto firms, while others represent legacy market infrastructure.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 6h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 6h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 6h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 6h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 8h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 8h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 9h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 9h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 10h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 10h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片