Centrifuge and Pharos Collaborate to Advance On-Chain Distribution Infrastructure for Institutional Assets

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-17Última atualização em 2026-02-17

Resumo

Centrifuge and Pharos have announced a collaboration to build shared on-chain infrastructure for the scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The partnership addresses a core challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. While tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets remain siloed, inaccessible, or become inactive after issuance. A key issue is that access to dollar-denominated products like credit and Treasuries remains restricted in many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe due to regulatory, operational, and custodial barriers. Even when tokenized, these assets are often distributed in a fragmented way, limiting their reach and usability within active on-chain financial systems. By integrating Centrifuge’s institutional tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’s “inclusive, execution-first” Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified environment for asset distribution, liquidity, and continuous on-chain operation. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets originated through Centrifuge, enabling deeper liquidity pathways and broader capital access. Centrifuge Labs CEO Bhaji Illuminati emphasized that “tokenization alone doesn’t solve accessibility and usability,” underscoring the need for distribution infrastructure. Pharos CEO Wish Wu noted that “the challeng...

February 17, 2026 - Centrifuge and Pharos announced today a collaboration aimed at enabling institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), to achieve scaled distribution and operation on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

This collaboration focuses on addressing a key challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. Although significant progress has been made in asset tokenization, a large number of institutional assets remain difficult to access, fragmented across different platforms, or become "static assets" after issuance, lacking continuous use cases. This collaboration aims to ensure that institutional assets do not merely stop at on-chain issuance but remain continuously usable within a functioning, real on-chain financial system.

In many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe, access to dollar-denominated credit and treasury products still faces regulatory, account registration, custody, and operational hurdles. Even when these products are tokenized, their distribution often remains indirect and fragmented, limiting their ability to reach new participants and their potential for active deployment and use after being brought on-chain.

By combining Centrifuge's institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards with Pharos's "inclusive, execution-first" Layer 1, this collaboration addresses these challenges at a systemic level. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital inflow and create deeper on-chain liquidity pathways. This integrated environment covers wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capabilities, enabling assets to be accessed, aggregated, allocated, and reused, rather than remaining idle long after issuance.

Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs, stated: "Tokenization alone does not solve the problems of accessibility and usability. The focus of this collaboration is to build the distribution and infrastructure layers that allow institutional assets to function within a real on-chain financial environment."

Pharos is positioned as an inclusive financial Layer 1, supporting high-throughput real-world financial workflows through native deep parallel execution and a modular architecture. The network is designed to host large-scale institutional asset activities and enable continuous on-chain operations.

Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos, stated: "The challenge is not demand, but infrastructure. This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can migrate on-chain and remain active within an open, composable financial system."

This collaboration is an early step towards "operational onchain finance": institutional assets are not only mapped onto the chain but are also supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement.

Pharos Network

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where real value and institutional-grade assets can circulate on-chain and achieve composability with decentralized assets, thereby becoming the next generation of financial-grade infrastructure for the global economy. Pharos combines a modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities to drive the development of an "asset-native" ecosystem. The project is built by a management and engineering team from Ant Group and is backed by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other global traditional finance (TradFi) investors.

Official website: https://www.pharos.xyz/

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main goal of the collaboration between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to enable scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

QWhat key challenge in institutional onchain finance does this partnership aim to address?

AThe partnership aims to address the challenge of distribution, ensuring that institutional assets are not just tokenized but remain actively usable within a functioning onchain financial system.

QHow does Pharos contribute to this collaboration?

APharos serves as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital access and deeper onchain liquidity pathways.

QWhat is Pharos Network's primary focus as a Layer 1 blockchain?

APharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, designed to enable the circulation of real-world and institutional-grade assets on-chain with composability with decentralized assets, featuring modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities.

QAccording to the CEOs, what is the broader vision behind this partnership?

AThe broader vision is to move towards 'operational onchain finance,' where institutional assets are not only tokenized but are actively supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement in an open, composable financial system.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 25m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 25m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 33m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 33m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 37m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 37m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 45m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 45m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 53m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think