CARF Global Implementation Timeline Overview: What Are the Commitments of Mainland China and Hong Kong?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-28Última atualização em 2026-01-28

Resumo

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is a global framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto-assets, targeting crypto-asset service providers as reporting entities. As of the end of 2025, 76 jurisdictions have committed to implementing CARF, with a phased rollout plan. The first group, including the UK and EU member states, will begin automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028. Data collection for reportable transactions will begin one year prior, starting in 2026. Hong Kong has explicitly committed to implementing CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data in 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with partner jurisdictions in 2028. Service providers operating in Hong Kong must establish compliance and reporting mechanisms. In contrast, Mainland China has not yet committed to CARF and is not included in any of the implementation batches. It is also not listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction with relevance that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict limitations on crypto-asset activities, there are no legal crypto-asset service providers that could be integrated into the CARF system. Therefore, in the short term, Mainland China does not meet the conditions for participating in CARF's routine information exchange. It is noted that Mainland C...

Author: Fintax

Basic Positioning of CARF

CARF is a framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets, with crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, used to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

Global Implementation Progress and Timeline

According to information released by the OECD Global Forum, as of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing CARF and will advance its implementation in batches.

The first group of jurisdictions plans to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027, primarily including the UK and EU member states, etc.; the second group of jurisdictions plans to fully implement in 2028, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and China Hong Kong, etc.

According to the institutional arrangement, the collection of relevant transaction data will commence one year in advance, starting from 2026, crypto-asset service providers will need to systematically organize reportable transaction information.

Figure 1: Overview of CARF Implementation Progress in Major Jurisdictions

China Hong Kong: Clear Participation and Timetable Advancement

In the aforementioned arrangement, China Hong Kong has clearly committed to implementing CARF and will advance related work according to the international timetable.

Hong Kong plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028.

Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms, and relevant reportable transactions will be included in the cross-border information exchange process.

Mainland China: Not Yet Committed and Outside the Implementation Scope

In comparison, Mainland China has not yet made an implementation commitment to CARF.

As of the current stage, Mainland China is not included in any implementation batch of CARF, nor has it been listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction that is relevant but has not yet committed to participation.

Under the current regulatory framework, the mainland adopts a strict restrictive attitude towards cryptocurrency trading activities, and there are no legal crypto-asset service providers within the country that can be纳入 the CARF reporting system; therefore, it does not currently meet the institutional conditions for participating in CARF's regularized information exchange.

Future Possibilities and Realistic Judgment

It should be pointed out that Mainland China has fully implemented CRS since 2018 and has mature experience in financial account information exchange.

If future crypto-asset regulatory policies are adjusted, the mainland has the institutional and technical conditions to对接 CARF.

However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of Mainland China joining this framework around the 2027 launch of CARF and in the following years remains relatively low.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the CARF and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is an international framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets. It targets crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, aiming to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

QHow many jurisdictions have committed to implementing the CARF as of the end of 2025, and what is the implementation timeline?

AAs of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing the CARF. The first group of jurisdictions, including the UK and EU member states, plan to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, China, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028.

QWhat is the commitment and implementation plan of Hong Kong, China regarding the CARF?

AHong Kong, China has explicitly committed to implementing the CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and begin automatic exchange of tax information with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028. Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework will need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms.

QWhat is the current status of Mainland China's commitment to the CARF?

AMainland China has not yet made a commitment to implement the CARF. It is not included in any of the implementation batches listed by the OECD and is not currently classified as a relevant jurisdiction that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict restrictions on crypto-asset activities, there are no legitimate crypto-asset service providers that could be incorporated into the CARF reporting system, making short-term participation unlikely.

QDoes Mainland China have the foundational experience to potentially join the CARF in the future?

AYes, Mainland China has comprehensive experience in financial account information exchange, having fully implemented the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) since 2018. This provides it with the technical and institutional foundation to potentially adapt to the CARF requirements if its crypto-asset regulatory policy were to change in the future. However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of joining the CARF around its 2027 launch or in the subsequent few years remains relatively low.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 6h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 6h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 6h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 6h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 9h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 9h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 10h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 10h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 11h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 11h

Trading

Spot

Futuros