Cardano Is Already Running Behind 200 German Companies, Foundation CEO Says

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-17Última atualização em 2026-04-17

Resumo

Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard revealed that approximately 200 large German companies are already using Cardano’s blockchain infrastructure—without being aware of it—through agentic AI deployments. These firms leverage Cardano as a security, digital identity, and accountability layer, particularly for verifying AI agents and ensuring data privacy without disclosure. Gregaard emphasized blockchain’s evolving role as a foundational trust layer for AI systems rather than just a payment rail. He noted that regulated stablecoins like USDM are used for microtransactions between AI agents, aligning incentives and enhancing security. He also highlighted Cardano’s regulatory positioning as a commodity, its quantum security features, and potential growth under emerging US and EU legislation. At the time of reporting, ADA was trading at $0.2566.

Cardano is already being used by roughly 200 large companies in Germany through agentic AI deployments, even if those firms do not realize the blockchain is sitting underneath their stack, according to Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard. The claim, made during an interview with Jane King on GBBC’s Markets on Chain series from the New York Stock Exchange published April 16, points to a version of blockchain adoption that is less visible to end users but potentially more embedded in enterprise infrastructure.

200 German Companies Use Cardano Without Even Knowing It

Gregaard framed the Cardano Foundation’s role as pushing blockchain into systems people use without necessarily recognizing it. “We have about 200 companies in Germany who live on agentic AI, fairly large companies, and they don’t even know they’re using Cardano as a security layer, as a digital identity layer and as an accountability layer,” he said. “Part of when you have, for instance, agentic AI who’s using data from two different databases, [is] ensuring that the agentic AI is who they say they are, that they have the data they claim without disclosing it, because we want privacy.”

That argument was central to Gregaard’s broader pitch: blockchain, in his view, is becoming an underlying trust and coordination layer for AI-driven systems rather than simply a rails story for tokens or payments. He described a model where users could interact with seamless consumer applications while Cardano handles provenance, identity and compliance in the background. The point was less about visible crypto branding than about infrastructure-level deployment.

Payments still featured prominently. Gregaard said AI agents in some of these systems are already transacting using a regulated stablecoin called USDM, with microtransactions used to meter prompt activity and align incentives between participants. “The AIs are actually paying themselves using regulatory compliant stablecoins,” he said. “There’s a microtransaction happening just to do the prompts. And that’s also part of the security layer, which ensures that one database who has more computing power than the other doesn’t do unlimited prompts and can circumvent the security.”

Why Cardano Could Strive In The EU And US

The interview also tied that enterprise and AI narrative to policy. Gregaard said the US stablecoin framework under the GENIUS Act had moved the market closer to Europe’s MiCA regime, but argued the more consequential shift could come from the Clarity Act. He said he expects that legislation, if passed, to unlock materially broader blockchain usage beyond financial applications, adding that “hundreds of companies” are already waiting on that kind of legal certainty. He further claimed that recent regulatory language had made clear that “Cardano is a commodity,” and suggested the US could move faster than Europe on this front.

Alongside adoption, Gregaard leaned heavily on security. He said Cardano’s on-chain governance model and distributed validator base make it harder to compromise through a single point of failure, a contrast with networks he described as effectively controlled by a small number of insiders. He also argued that Cardano is emerging as a “first level quantum secure environment” through its interoperability with legal entity identity standards, which he said is drawing interest from banks, brokers, exchanges and central securities depositories.

At press time, Cardano traded at $0.2566.

ADA hovers below key resistance, 1-monthly chart | Source: ADAUSDT on TradingView.com

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the Cardano Foundation CEO, how many large companies in Germany are using Cardano without realizing it, and for what purposes?

AAccording to Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard, roughly 200 large companies in Germany are using Cardano as a security layer, a digital identity layer, and an accountability layer in their agentic AI deployments, without even knowing the blockchain is underneath their stack.

QWhat specific type of digital currency are the AI agents using for microtransactions in these systems, and what is its purpose?

AThe AI agents are using a regulated stablecoin called USDM for microtransactions. These microtransactions are used to meter prompt activity and align incentives between participants, and they form part of the security layer to prevent abuse.

QWhat US legislation does Gregaard suggest could unlock significantly broader blockchain usage beyond financial applications?

AGregaard suggests that the Clarity Act, if passed, could unlock materially broader blockchain usage beyond financial applications. He claims that 'hundreds of companies' are waiting for this kind of legal certainty.

QHow does Gregaard contrast Cardano's security model with that of other networks?

AGregaard contrasts Cardano's security by highlighting its on-chain governance model and distributed validator base, which make it harder to compromise through a single point of failure. He contrasts this with networks he describes as effectively controlled by a small number of insiders.

QWhat two key regulatory frameworks does the article mention in the context of stablecoins, and which region does Gregaard suggest might move faster on classifying assets like Cardano?

AThe article mentions the US stablecoin framework under the GENIUS Act and Europe's MiCA regime. Gregaard suggests that the US could move faster than Europe on providing regulatory clarity, recently stating that regulatory language has made clear that 'Cardano is a commodity.'

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 26m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 26m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 46m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 46m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 54m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 54m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ADA

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Cardano (ADA) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Cardano (ADA) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Cardano (ADA)Depois de comprar o teu Cardano (ADA), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Cardano (ADA)Transaciona facilmente Cardano (ADA) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

1.3k Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ADA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ADA (ADA) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片