Canada Introduces New Crypto Custody Rules to Protect Investors After QuadrigaCX Collapse

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-04Última atualização em 2026-02-04

Resumo

Following the QuadrigaCX collapse in 2019, which resulted in the loss of $123 million in customer funds, Canada’s Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) has introduced new crypto custody rules for exchanges. The regulations aim to protect investors by enforcing stronger custody arrangements, improved internal controls, and clear separation of client assets from company funds. The framework adopts a risk-based approach, requiring higher-risk firms to meet stricter standards while allowing flexibility for lower-risk platforms. CIRO will actively update the rules as new threats emerge and has the authority to investigate misconduct and impose penalties. The move reflects Canada’s protective regulatory stance, bringing crypto custody under existing securities laws.

The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) has announced that Canada has introduced new crypto custody rules for the exchanges to reduce the risk of investor losses and prevent failures, as the QuadrigaCX collapse happened in 2019.

This move immediately takes effect after the direct response to the past crypto failure, like the QuadrigaCX collapse. QuadrigaCX was one of the canada’s largest crypto exchanges. After its CEO died, it has missed about $123 million of customer funds. Investigations later found that this was caused by its poor controls, weak governance, and serious custody failures.

What CIRO’S new crypto rules do

CIRO’S Digital Asset Custody Framework used a risk-based approach, which sets clear standards for protecting investors from hacking, fraud, weak controls, and poor governance. The firms which higher risk activities should meet the stronger custody standards, and the lower-risk firms get more flexibility but still need the protections.

After the new rules, crypto platforms in Canada should use stronger custody arrangements and improve the internal controls and oversight with clear separation of customer assets from the company funds. CIRO says many platforms are already following a similar structure, and any transitions to the new rules will be handled case by case without disrupting the firms suddenly.

Canada’s approach towards crypto custody

CIRO says that it will actively monitor the new risk, and the regulators will update the new rules if they seem to have any new custody threats and repeated problems across the firms. This shows that the framework still needs to be fixed and will evolve as per the crypto market changes.

Canada has taken a protective approach towards crypto regulations and is bringing crypto custody platforms under the existing securities laws. CIRO has the authority to investigate the misconduct, impose fines, and suspend the firms, which shows a strong focus on the custody and increased attention on stablecoins.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Eyes Frame Transactions as Hegota Headliner

TagsCanadaCryptocurrency

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat event prompted Canada to introduce new crypto custody rules?

AThe collapse of QuadrigaCX in 2019, which resulted in the loss of approximately $123 million in customer funds due to poor controls, weak governance, and custody failures.

QWhich organization announced Canada's new crypto custody rules?

AThe Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) announced the new crypto custody rules.

QWhat is the main approach of CIRO's Digital Asset Custody Framework?

AIt uses a risk-based approach, setting clear standards for protecting investors from hacking, fraud, weak controls, and poor governance, with higher-risk firms facing stronger custody requirements.

QHow do the new rules require crypto platforms to handle customer assets?

APlatforms must use stronger custody arrangements with clear separation of customer assets from company funds and improve internal controls and oversight.

QWhat regulatory powers does CIRO have under the new framework?

ACIRO has the authority to investigate misconduct, impose fines, and suspend firms, showing a strong focus on custody and increased attention on stablecoins.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 9m

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 9m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 19m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 19m

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHá 28m

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHá 28m

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow