Caldera Launches Metalayer Token Launcher

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-04-08Última atualização em 2026-04-08

Resumo

Caldera has officially launched the Metalayer Token Launcher, the first no-code solution for cross-chain token deployment. This tool enables projects to quickly create and deploy MetaTokens without the need to write smart contracts or perform complex technical configurations. Users can set the token name, total supply, and Treasury wallet address to complete token creation and deployment within minutes, significantly lowering the technical barriers to launching on-chain economic systems. In its initial phase, the Metalayer Token Launcher will support both Arbitrum and Ethereum, featuring near real-time cross-chain bridging between the two networks. Each token created through Metalayer will have its own dedicated bridge page, simplifying cross-chain asset transfers and reducing operational complexity and cost. The core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, allowing projects to launch their token systems and economic models more efficiently and at a lower cost. Future updates will expand support to additional blockchain networks, broadening the scope of cross-chain asset issuance and circulation. Caldera continues to enhance the Metalayer ecosystem, making token creation, cross-chain transfers, and on-chain economy setup simpler and more flexible.

Caldera has officially launched the Metalayer Token Launcher, the first no-code solution supporting cross-chain token deployment. It provides project teams with a suite of code-free token issuance tools, enabling rapid creation and deployment of MetaTokens, further lowering the technical barriers to launching on-chain economic systems and asset issuance.

The Metalayer Token Launcher significantly simplifies the token issuance process. Users only need to set the token name, total supply, and add a Treasury wallet address to complete token creation and deployment within minutes, without writing smart contracts or performing complex technical configurations, allowing projects to launch their on-chain economic systems more quickly.

In the initial phase, the Metalayer Token Launcher will support the Arbitrum and Ethereum ecosystems, with near real-time cross-chain bridging between the two chains. Each token created through Metalayer will come with an independent cross-chain bridge page, making asset transfers between different chains more convenient and efficient, while reducing the cost and complexity of cross-chain operations.

The core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, enabling project teams to launch their token systems and economic models at lower costs and with higher efficiency. In the future, the Metalayer Token Launcher will gradually support more blockchain networks, further expanding cross-chain asset issuance and circulation scenarios.

With the launch of the Metalayer Token Launcher, Caldera continues to enhance its Metalayer ecosystem infrastructure, making token creation, cross-chain circulation, and on-chain economic system setup simpler, more flexible, and more efficient.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main product announced by Caldera in the article?

ACaldera announced the Metalayer Token Launcher, a no-code solution for cross-chain token deployment.

QWhich two blockchain ecosystems are initially supported by the Metalayer Token Launcher?

AThe Metalayer Token Launcher initially supports the Arbitrum and Ethereum ecosystems.

QWhat are the key steps required for a user to create a token using the Metalayer Token Launcher?

AUsers only need to set the token name, total supply, and add a Treasury wallet address to create a token.

QWhat additional feature does every token created through Metalayer include to facilitate cross-chain movement?

AEvery token created through Metalayer includes an independent cross-chain bridge page for easier and more efficient asset movement between chains.

QWhat is the core goal of the Metalayer project as stated in the article?

AThe core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, allowing projects to launch their token systems and economic models at a lower cost and with higher efficiency.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 23m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 23m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 31m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 31m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 35m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 35m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 42m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 42m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 51m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think