Buying Gold While Buying U.S. Stocks

Publicado em 2026-08-11Última atualização em 2026-08-11

Resumo

Central banks worry about the US government, but investors believe in American companies. Chen Li argues that global capital is not fleeing the US, but rather choosing US dollar assets differently: central banks are increasing their gold reserves to hedge against fiscal and US dollar credit risks, while investors continue to bet on core US technology firms like AI and chip companies. Therefore, a divergence in asset performance is likely, potentially presenting a picture of 'gold stronger than the US dollar, US stocks stronger than US bonds'.

Gold is rising again.

On August 7th, the employment data released by the U.S. was significantly weaker than market expectations. U.S. non-farm payrolls fell by 23,000 in July, while the market had expected an increase of 80,000. The U.S. dollar index immediately dropped by 0.44%, and spot gold rose by 2.55%, reaching around $4,347 per ounce.

The familiar explanations have resurfaced.

The U.S. economy is weakening. Rate hike expectations are declining. Doubts about the credibility of the U.S. dollar are growing. Gold, as a safe-haven asset, is regaining favor.

These explanations are not wrong.

But such explanations were also applicable a year ago. Whether gold rises or falls, the explanation seems to fit.

In reality, central banks around the world have been increasing their gold reserves regardless of price fluctuations. Investors have also consistently worried about the U.S. fiscal deficit, government debt, and the purchasing power of the dollar. Meanwhile, global capital has continuously been buying U.S. stocks, especially core technology assets in AI, chips, cloud computing, and software platforms.

Buying gold while buying U.S. stocks.

The former seems to be avoiding the dollar. The latter is buying dollar-denominated assets.

Are the central banks wrong? Or are the investors wrong?

The answer might be that neither is wrong.

Central banks are worried about the U.S. government. Investors believe in U.S. corporations.

Global capital is reducing its reliance on dollar credit, but not its reliance on U.S. assets.

The Dollar Has Two Balance Sheets

The market often views the dollar as an asset. In fact, the dollar is backed by two different balance sheets.

The first is the U.S. government's balance sheet.

This sheet includes the fiscal deficit, government debt, interest expenses, inflation, and political credibility. Whether the U.S. government can control spending, stabilize currency purchasing power, and continue to provide the world's most reliable reserve asset is reflected on this sheet.

Gold primarily prices this sheet.

The larger the U.S. fiscal deficit, the faster the debt grows, the higher the uncertainty of holding dollars and long-term U.S. Treasuries becomes. Central banks increasing gold holdings are not necessarily preparing to abandon the dollar, but they are certainly reducing their singular dependence on U.S. government credit.

The second is the profit and loss statement of core U.S. corporations.

This sheet includes AI, chips, cloud computing, software, advertising, enterprise services, and global consumer platforms.

The U.S. government's fiscal situation may deteriorate, but the competitiveness of U.S. corporations does not necessarily decline in sync.

The U.S. still possesses the world's largest-scale tech companies, the most liquid capital markets, and the strongest capacity for innovation financing. Global investors find it difficult to locate the same quantity, scale, and global competitiveness in tech assets in other markets.

Therefore, investors can perfectly reduce their holdings of long-term U.S. Treasuries while increasing their holdings of gold, U.S. dollar cash, and U.S. tech stocks.

Not trusting the U.S. fiscal situation is not the same as not trusting U.S. corporations. The U.S. government's balance sheet is worsening, but the profit and loss statements of core U.S. corporations remain strong.

Rising Gold is a Stress Test for the Dollar System

The rise in gold prices is often simplistically interpreted as a decline in dollar credibility.

This statement has some merit but is not entirely accurate.

Gold is not an inverse indicator of the dollar index, nor is it a direct substitute for the dollar system. Gold is more like insurance for the dollar system.

Gold has no sovereign risk. It does not rely on any single country's promise to repay principal and interest, nor does it rely on any single central bank to maintain its credibility. For central banks, the value of gold lies not only in price appreciation but also in the fact that it is not a liability of any country.

In recent years, central banks' persistent purchases of gold reflect not that the dollar is about to lose its reserve currency status, but that the insurance premium for the dollar reserve system is rising.

The U.S. fiscal deficit has not contracted significantly. Government interest expenses continue to increase. Tariffs, energy prices, and geopolitical conflicts make future inflation even harder to judge.

The upcoming U.S. midterm elections will also increase this uncertainty.

What the market truly cares about is not just which party wins more seats, but whether, after the elections, the U.S. still has the capability to control its fiscal deficit.

Tax cuts affect fiscal revenue. Subsidies expand government spending. Tariffs may increase inflation. If Congress becomes more divided, fiscal reform will also become more difficult.

Gold is pricing not who wins the election, but whether anyone will be willing to control the deficit after the election.

Therefore, the long-term price anchor for gold still has support.

But the existence of a long-term logic does not mean this rapid rebound can continue in a straight line.

If Rate Hike Expectations Decline, Gold May Correct

Contrary to some market expectations, I personally believe U.S. inflation expectations will decline over the next two months.

If the situation in the Middle East gradually eases, energy prices retreat from highs, and the one-time price shock from the World Cup dissipates, U.S. sequential inflation and market inflation expectations may decline. Weaker U.S. employment data will also reduce market expectations for the Federal Reserve to continue raising rates.

On the surface, these changes are favorable for gold. However, declining rate hike expectations do not necessarily mean real interest rates will fall.

Real interest rates roughly equal nominal interest rates minus inflation expectations. If inflation expectations fall faster than U.S. Treasury yields, real interest rates could actually rise.

Gold itself does not generate interest. A rise in real interest rates means the opportunity cost of holding gold increases. Investors can obtain higher real returns from U.S. Treasuries, and the relative attractiveness of gold would then decline.

Typically, when real interest rates rise, gold prices fall.

Furthermore, short-term price fluctuations are influenced significantly by trading structures.

This round of gold price rebound has been very rapid. Factors such as weaker U.S. employment, a falling dollar, geopolitical risks, and central bank purchases have been traded intensively by the market. Short-term capital has flowed in quickly, increasing profit-taking pressure. Judging from trading data and technical patterns, after a rapid surge, gold needs to digest its gains through a price correction or sideways consolidation.

My judgment is that the long-term logic for gold has not disappeared, but this rapid rebound may enter a correction phase at any time.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street Morning Report: Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Falls Nearly 3%, Nvidia's 'Circular Financing' Concerns Trigger Tech Stock Correction, Optical Communication and Chip Stocks Plunge

Wall Street Morning Report: The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell nearly 3%, and concerns over Nvidia's "revolving financing" sparked a tech stock pullback, with optical communications and chip stocks declining sharply. U.S. stocks retreated from record highs on Monday amid geopolitical tensions and AI financing doubts. The Dow fell 0.11%, the Nasdaq 0.32%, and the S&P 500 was nearly flat. Hopes for reopening the Strait of Hormuz dimmed after Trump demanded war reparations from Iran, pushing Brent crude above $87 and WTI above $82. Spot gold broke above $4400/oz. Treasury yields rose, with the market pricing in a ~54% chance of a September Fed hike. The semiconductor and AI infrastructure sectors were hit hard. The Philly Semiconductor Index dropped nearly 3%, with the semiconductor ETF down 2.28%. Optical communication was the worst-performing AI sub-sector, with Coherent plunging over 14%. The sell-off centered on Nvidia, which fell 2.86% on reports it is collaborating with major financial institutions to mobilize over $500 billion in third-party capital for AI infrastructure. Market concerns focused on whether this creates a circular financing loop and if future AI facilities can generate sufficient cash flow. Other notable moves: Intel dropped over 4% on a new share offering. Microsoft rose 1.21% on plans for its next-gen Maia 300 chip. The software sector outperformed, with Palantir up 1.85%. Energy stocks rallied nearly 4.7% on geopolitical risks. Key upcoming events include the RBA rate decision on Aug 11 and earnings from Lumentum, CoreWeave, and Super Micro Computer after the close on Aug 12, which will test the real demand for AI infrastructure.

marsbitHá 26m

Wall Street Morning Report: Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Falls Nearly 3%, Nvidia's 'Circular Financing' Concerns Trigger Tech Stock Correction, Optical Communication and Chip Stocks Plunge

marsbitHá 26m

Podcast Notes | VanEck Digital Asset Research Head: Current AI Infrastructure Rally Not a Bubble; Crypto Market Quiet Due to Institutional Disappointment in L1s

In this podcast, VanEck's Head of Digital Asset Research Matthew Sigel discusses the current market dynamics. He argues the ongoing AI infrastructure boom is not a bubble, contrasting it with the 19th-century railroad mania. Unlike railroads funded by speculative land grants and government bonds, today's AI data centers are backed by long-term private contracts and significant customer prepayments, making the investment cycle more sustainable. Sigel notes a recent market shift: companies with high capital expenditures (capex) were rewarded in early 2024 but are now being punished. Cryptocurrencies, categorized as software assets, have suffered alongside the broader software sector. His NODE ETF has outperformed Bitcoin by nearly 100 percentage points over 15 months, largely by betting on Bitcoin miners transitioning into AI data centers. He highlights the value of miners' key assets—power and land—and their new ability to fund growth through debt instead of diluting shareholders. Regarding the crypto market's weakness, Sigel points to institutional disappointment with major Layer-1 (L1) blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. Post-election rallies lacked breakout applications, and regulated entities are increasingly building their own private, permissioned chains (e.g., by Circle, Stripe, Wells Fargo), diluting the "winner-takes-all" potential of public L1s. He believes a regulatory catalyst like the CLARITY Act, which would enforce disclosure standards, could trigger a significant relief rally for some tokens, but remains cautious until then. He also views proposals by ETH, Solana, and NEAR to reduce token inflation as a positive, necessary adjustment for the maturing sector.

marsbitHá 30m

Podcast Notes | VanEck Digital Asset Research Head: Current AI Infrastructure Rally Not a Bubble; Crypto Market Quiet Due to Institutional Disappointment in L1s

marsbitHá 30m

Shenzhen Competing for 'Tsinghua Faction' Talent

Shenzhen is actively attracting Tsinghua University-affiliated technology ventures, as highlighted during the "X-Day" Xili Lake Roadshow held in Nanshan. The event featured six startup projects from Tsinghua alumni, spanning semiconductors, AI, materials, and healthcare. The showcased companies include: Zhichen Semiconductor, developing edge AI chips; Guangsu Evolution, creating AI-powered home security systems; Qingli Technology, commercializing "self-superlubricating" technology; Shu Yu Technology, offering an AI Agent for analog chip design; Heyi Intelligent Control, providing AI-driven building management systems; and Shengshengyi, applying AI to assisted reproductive medicine. These ventures represent a trend of deep-tech innovation closely linked to academic research. The roadshow series, initiated a year ago, underscores a strategic shift in Shenzhen's investment landscape. Venture capital is moving earlier into the innovation cycle, seeking projects directly from laboratories and research papers. Tsinghua University serves as a key source for such early-stage, technology-intensive startups. Over the past two years, Tsinghua alumni projects have accounted for nearly 30% of the approximately 280 billion RMB in early-stage deep-tech funding in Shenzhen. The "X-Day" platform has facilitated significant growth. To date, its 19 roadshows have connected companies with investors thousands of times, leading to over 3.3 billion RMB in equity financing for 58 firms. Past participants like Kuaiwei Intelligent (recently valued over 10 billion RMB after a Series B round) and Lingcifang (securing four funding rounds in 18 months) exemplify the successful trajectory from this ecosystem. The activity underscores Shenzhen's, particularly Nanshan District's, role in bridging academic research from institutions like Tsinghua with industrial application and venture capital.

marsbitHá 31m

Shenzhen Competing for 'Tsinghua Faction' Talent

marsbitHá 31m

Trading

Spot
活动图片