Brian Armstrong Praises ‘Diamond Hands’ as Coinbase Reports Strong Retail Activity

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-17Última atualização em 2026-02-17

Resumo

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, reports that retail investors are displaying "diamond hands" by continuing to accumulate Bitcoin and Ethereum despite recent market volatility. According to Coinbase data, most retail customers now hold equal or greater amounts of these cryptocurrencies in native units compared to December 2025, indicating accumulation during price declines. This behavior contrasts with previous cycles where retail often sold during corrections. Armstrong's comments come amid his own significant stock sales, totaling over $550 million since April 2025 under a prearranged trading plan. Analysts suggest sustained retail buying could stabilize markets, though sentiment remains sensitive to macro conditions and regulatory challenges.

Retail investors appear to be holding their ground through the latest wave of crypto market volatility, according to new data shared by Brian Armstrong, chief executive of Coinbase.

The exchange says many individual users have continued accumulating major cryptocurrencies despite price swings, a trend Armstrong described as evidence of “diamond hands.”

The remarks arrive at a time when digital asset markets remain uncertain, shaped by macroeconomic pressure, regulatory developments, and leveraged trading activity. While prices have fluctuated sharply, Coinbase’s internal metrics suggest retail traders are behaving differently compared to previous downturns.

BTC's price trends to the downside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Retail Investors Buy the Dip During Market Volatility

Armstrong said platform data shows most retail customers now hold equal or greater amounts of Bitcoin and Ethereum than they did in December 2025. The figures track “native units,” meaning the number of coins held rather than their dollar value, indicating accumulation even as prices moved lower.

Bitcoin recently traded near $68,500, while Ethereum hovered around the $2,000 level after a period of declines and rebounds. According to Coinbase, many users responded to the pullback by adding to their positions rather than exiting the market.

The trend contrasts with earlier crypto cycles, when retail investors were often seen selling during sharp corrections. Analysts note that steady spot buying from smaller investors can help counterbalance volatility driven by derivatives markets, where leveraged positions frequently amplify price swings through liquidations.

Coinbase also reported that retail accumulation contributed to renewed activity on the platform, with its stock rising in recent sessions alongside increased trading interest in the two largest cryptocurrencies.

Executive Stock Sales Draw Attention

Armstrong’s praise for retail resilience has coincided with scrutiny over his own share sales. Regulatory filings show the CEO has sold more than $550 million worth of Coinbase stock between April 2025 and January 2026, including transactions exceeding $100 million in recent months.

The sales were executed under a prearranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, a mechanism commonly used by public-company executives to schedule stock disposals in advance.

Supporters argue that such plans are standard financial management tools, while critics say the scale of the sales sends mixed signals, encouraging retail investors to hold through volatility.

Similarly, Coinbase continues to navigate broader challenges, including regulatory disputes tied to new product expansions such as prediction markets in several U.S. states.

What Retail Resilience Means for Market Sentiment

Market analysts say sustained retail accumulation could play a stabilizing role if macro conditions improve. Historically, periods where smaller investors continue buying during downturns have sometimes preceded recovery phases in crypto cycles.

However, sentiment remains sensitive to interest rate expectations, geopolitical risks, and institutional flows. For Coinbase, the combination of strong retail engagement and ongoing insider selling highlights the complex balance between leadership messaging, investor perception, and market performance in a volatile environment.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat does Brian Armstrong's praise of 'diamond hands' refer to in the context of Coinbase's recent report?

AIt refers to retail investors holding or accumulating major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum despite recent market volatility and price declines, rather than selling their positions.

QHow does the current behavior of retail investors on Coinbase differ from previous crypto market downturns?

AUnlike previous cycles where retail investors often sold during sharp corrections, current data shows they are accumulating more coins or holding their ground, demonstrating increased resilience.

QWhat potential market impact does sustained retail accumulation have according to analysts?

AAnalysts suggest that steady spot buying from retail investors can help counterbalance volatility driven by derivatives markets and may play a stabilizing role if macroeconomic conditions improve, sometimes preceding recovery phases.

QWhat controversy has emerged alongside Armstrong's comments about retail investor behavior?

AArmstrong has faced scrutiny for selling over $550 million worth of Coinbase stock between April 2025 and January 2026 through prearranged trading plans, which some say sends mixed signals while encouraging retail investors to hold.

QWhat specific metric does Coinbase use to show retail accumulation despite price declines?

ACoinbase tracks 'native units' - the actual number of coins held by users - rather than dollar value, showing most retail customers hold equal or greater amounts of Bitcoin and Ethereum compared to December 2025 despite lower prices.

Leituras Relacionadas

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHá 2m

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHá 2m

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHá 3m

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHá 3m

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHá 13m

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHá 13m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

Blockchain Finds Its True Path After 18 Years: Becoming the Financial Backbone for AI Agents and Autonomy This analysis explores a pivotal shift in the blockchain and crypto investment landscape, driven by the dominance of AI. Major venture capital firms, including Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs, are moving beyond pure "crypto" investment theses. They are expanding their focus to AI, robotics, and frontier tech, signaling that blockchain is no longer seen as a standalone sector but as an underlying infrastructure layer. The core argument is that blockchain's killer application may not be user-facing apps, but rather providing the economic rails for the coming wave of AI agents, autonomous robots, and automated systems. Key capabilities like self-custody wallets, programmable stablecoins for micropayments, on-chain identity, and verifiable smart contracts are positioned as essential for a future where machines conduct economic activity. The recent $1.4 billion investment by Tether (via its venture arm) in German robotics company NEURA Robotics exemplifies this, aiming to embed Tether's wallet tools directly into robots for autonomous transactions. While many "AI + Crypto" projects remain superficial, the article concludes that true value lies where crypto is a necessary component—enabling machine-to-machine payments, agent autonomy, verifiable data provenance, and open financial settlement for the AI era. For crypto venture capital, this convergence with AI represents both an adaptation to shifting capital flows and a potential path to unlocking the large-scale, non-speculative utility the industry has long sought.

marsbitHá 33m

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

marsbitHá 33m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片