Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-20Última atualização em 2026-02-20

Resumo

Mike McGlone, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, has revised his Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction upward from a previous low of $10,000 to $28,000, citing historical price distribution. However, he maintains a cautious outlook, suggesting the buy-the-dip strategy may be over and noting that traditional assets like stocks, gold, and silver are attracting investors with lower volatility compared to cryptocurrencies. His forecasts have faced criticism from the crypto community, with some labeling them as alarmist and potentially misleading. Despite the revision, broader concerns about Bitcoin's volatility persist, with current prices around $67,471.96 and a high volatility rating. The article emphasizes that this is not financial advice and encourages independent research.

Mike McGlobe, a Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst, has revised his BTC price prediction. While the number is still worrisome, it presents a comparatively better picture than before. Hence, keeping the broader concern as it was previously. Mike has noted several factors to back his forecast while the crypto community remains optimistic in general.

BTC Price Prediction by Mike McGlone

The Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst had earlier stated a BTC price prediction of $10,000, signaling that the flagship token could stoop to that level as a lowest value. Mike McGlone reportedly warned that the crypto bubble was imploding, underlining a 85% chance for bitcoins to reach a low.

His forecast made its way to the market, among investors, only to face criticism. Many called his projection alarmist and risky for investors, possibly because statements like these could trigger massive selling. Mike has now revised his estimate to $28,000 on the grounds of historical price distribution.

The revised forecast has also met with criticism, with investors saying that it could distort positioning and put capital at risk.

Factors in Support

Mike has stated a few factors to support this projection for BTC price. He has said that it’s possible for the buy-the-dip mantra to be over. Another factor is a surge in stock markets with lower volatility in comparison to Bitcoin tokens, or cryptocurrencies in general.

Finally, he has said that Gold and Silver are also performing well for investors who are looking to book profits.

Notably, he has highlighted that the crypto sphere might be losing faith in Trump and his stance towards boosting the segment. Both his projections are reportedly being challenged by investors and crypto enthusiasts.

For instance, Quantum Economics Founder Mati Greenspan has published a post on X, and has said that the price prediction was done to stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.

Volatility for BTC

While price predictions are never certain, BTC does seem to be struggling with volatility. The figure of 11.75% currently features under the Very High category with an FGI of 7 points. Even a general price prediction has been revised to $71,355 in the next 3 months. It does sound optimistic but is down from the monthly projection of $77,018.

The flagship token is up by 1.51% over the last 24 hours, trading at $67,471.96 when the article is being written. Do your research thoroughly, and do not take the content of this article as advice or a recommendation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Weakens for Ethena (ENA): Will the Bears Deliver Another Blow?

TagsBitcoin (BTC)BTC price

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Mike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction and what was his previous prediction?

AMike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction is $28,000. His previous prediction was that the price could drop to $10,000 as a lowest value.

QWhat are some of the factors Mike McGlone cited to support his revised price forecast for Bitcoin?

AMcGlone cited several factors: the possibility that the 'buy-the-dip' mantra is over, a surge in stock markets with lower volatility compared to Bitcoin, and the strong performance of Gold and Silver for profit-seeking investors.

QHow did the crypto community generally react to Mike McGlone's price predictions?

AThe crypto community reacted with criticism to both of McGlone's predictions. Many labeled his initial $10,000 forecast as 'alarmist' and 'risky,' and his revised $28,000 prediction was also criticized for potentially distorting market positioning and putting capital at risk.

QAccording to the article, what is the current volatility status and Fear & Greed Index (FGI) reading for Bitcoin?

AThe article states that Bitcoin's volatility is currently at 11.75%, which is categorized as 'Very High,' and the Fear & Greed Index (FGI) is at 7 points.

QWhat was Mati Greenspan's criticism of Mike McGlone's price prediction?

AMati Greenspan, Founder of Quantum Economics, criticized the prediction, stating that it was done to 'stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.'

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 1h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 1h

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 3h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow